Fatigue and Reliability Analysis of Unidirectional GFRP Composites under Rotating Bending Loads

Abstract

Rotating bending fatigue tests have been conducted on unidirectional glass fiber reinforced polyester (GFRP) composites. Standard test specimens were manufactured in form of circular rods with various fiber volume fraction (V _f) ratios. Failure modes of the composite rods have been examined using scanning electron microscope. The two-parameter Weibull distribution function was used to investigate the statistical analysis of the experimental fatigue life results. Safe design life based on time to first failure (TTFF) concept was calculated at high confidence level γ=0.99 and at two values of reliability, R=0.368 and 0.99.

S–N diagrams of mean life, 50% survival life, lower bound life and safe design fatigue life have been constructed for GFRP rods with various values of V _f ratios. These diagrams are of considerable value to the designer specially when the structure contains a critical component where any failure is catastrophic. No rigorous fatigue limit was observed within 10⁷ cycles in these S–N diagrams. The fiber volume fractions have insignificant effect on the slope of the power function that fits the mean fatigue life. At the same number of cycles the stress amplitude required to fracture the specimens with V _f=44.7% was increased by an order equal to 1.58 and1.25 than specimens with V _f=15.8 and 31.8% respectively. The widest scatter was observed at the life range of 10⁵ and 10⁶ cycles for GFRP rode with different V _f ratios. This tendency in the dispersion of fatigue life at varying stress levels is extremely important and deserves much attention for the design and application of GFRP composites.

Keywords

unidirectional composite rods rotating bending fatigue Weibull distribution reliability analysis mean life survival life lower bound life safe design life

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Kim, H. C. and Ebert, L. J. (1978). Axial Fatigue Failure Sequence and Mechanisms in Unidirectional Fiberglass Composites, J. Composite Materials, 12: 139–152.

2. Tsai, S. W. (1988). Composite Design, 4th edn., Think Composites, Dayton, Ohio.

3. Tong, J. (2001). Three Stages of Fatigue Crack Growth in GFRP Composite Laminates, J. Engineering Materials and Technology, 123: 139–143.

4. Wu, W. F. , Lee, L. J. and Choi, S. T. (1996). A Study of Fatigue Damage and Fatigue Life of Composite Laminates, J. Composite Materials, 30(1).

5. Murri, G. B. , Schaff, J. R. and Dobyns, A. L. (2001). Fatigue and Damage Tolerance Analysis of a Hybrid Composite Tapered Flexbeam, American Helicopter Society Forum, Washington, DC. http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ltrs/PDF/2001/mtg/NASA-2001-57ahs-gbm.pdf.

6. Krueger, R. , Paris, I. L. and O’Brien, T. K. (2001). Fatigue Life Methodology for Bonded Composite Skin/Stringer Configurations, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 2368-2199. http://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ltrs/PDF/2001tm/NASA-2001-tm210842.pdf.

7. Long, M. W. and Narciso, J. D. (1999). Probabilistic Design Methodology for Composite Aircraft Structures National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia, 22161-22161. http://aar400.tc.faa.gov/acc/accompdocs/99-2.pdf.

8. Tanimoto, T. , Amijima, S. and Matsuoka, T. (1985). Fatigue Life Estimation of Laminated GRP Materials under Various Random Load Patterns, pp. 199–210, ICCM-V, California.

9. Cohen, D. (1992). Application of Reliability and Fiber Probabilistic Strength Distribution Concept to Composite Vessel Burst Strength Design, J. Composite Materials, 26: 1984–2014.

10.

10. Abdin, E. M. , Abd Allah, M. H. , Selmy, A. I. and Khashaba, U. A. (1991). Tensile, Compressive and Flexural Properties of FRP Composite Rods. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Int. Conf. on Mech. Design and Prod., pp. 48–60, Cairo University, Egypt.

11.

11. Khashaba, U. A. (1997). Shear Behavior of Unidirectional GFRP Composite. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Int. Conf. on Prod. Eng., Design and Control, Vol. 1, pp. 231–241, Alexandria University, Egypt.

12.

12. Abd Allah, M. H. , Abdin, E. M. , Selmy, A. I. and Khashaba, U. A. (1996). Effect of Fibre Volume Fractions on Fatigue Behaviour of GFRP Pultruded Rod Composites, J. Composites Science and Technology, 56: 23–29.

13.

13. Abd Allah, M. H. , Abdin, E. M. , Selmy, A. I. and Khashaba, U. A. (1997). Effect of Mean Stress on Fatigue Behavior of GFRP Pultruded Rod Composites, J. Composites, Part A, 28: 87–91.

14.

14. Abd Allah, M. H. , Abdin, E. M. , Selmy, A. I. and Khashaba, U. A. (1996). Reliability Analysis of GFRP Pultruded Composite Rods, J. Quality and Reliability Management, 13(2): 88–98.

15.

15. El-Assal, A. M. and Khashaba, U. A. (1999). Combined Torsional and Bending Fatigue of Unidirectional GFRP Composites. In: Proceedings of the Second Int. Conf. on Mech. Eng. Adv. Tech. for Indus. Prod., Vol. 1, pp. 206–216, Assiut University, Egypt.

16.

16. Tanimoto, T. , Amijima, S. and Ishikawa, H. (1979). A Reliability Analysis Approach to Fatigue Life Dispersion of Laminated Glass Fiber Composite Materials, ICM 3, Vol. 3, pp. 207–216, Cambridge, England.

17.

17. Wu, H. F. (1989). Statistical Analysis of Tensile Strength of ARALL Laminates, J. Composite Materials, 23: 1065–1080.

18.

18. Halpin, J. C. , Kopf, J. R. and Goldberg, W. (1970). Time Dependent Static Strength and Reliability for Composites, J. Composite Materials, 4: 462–475.

19.

19. Knight, M. and Hahn, H. T. (1975). Strength and Elastic Modulus of a Randomly-Distributed Short Fiber Composite, J. Composite Materials, 9: 77–90.

20.

20. Lipson, C. and Sheth, N. J. (1973). Statistical Design and Analysis of Engineering Experiments, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.