Mechanical Properties and Water Absorption Behavior of Composites Made from a Biodegradable Matrix and Alkaline-Treated Sisal Fibers

Abstract

Biocomposites were produced using a biodegradable material as matrix, and sisal fibers as reinforcement. The biodegradable material is a commercial product called MaterBi-Y, which is based on a cellulose derivatives and starch system. The characterization of these biocomposites was not done before and it is necessary in order to select a material instead of nonbiodegradable matrices. An alkaline treatment was performed in order to improve the mechanical properties of the fiber. The effect of the treatment on fiber properties and on impact, flexural, and tensile properties of composites were determined. Fiber content enhances the tensile properties of the biodegradable matrix. Water sorption studies were performed. The experimentally observed tensile properties (modulus and tensile strength) of short sisal fiber-reinforced cellulose derivatives/starch composites with different fiber loading are compared with the calculated values obtained from the existing theories of reinforcement.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Bledzki, A.K. and Gassan, J. (1999). Prog. Polym. Sci., 24: 221 .

2. Iannace, S, Nocilla, L. and Nicolais, L. (1999). J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 73: 585 .

3. Hanselka, H. and Herrman, A.S. (1995). In: Hanselka, H.L. (ed.), 7 Internationales Techtexil Symposium 1994.

4. Dufresne, A. and Vignon, M.R. (1998). Macromolecules, 31: 2693 .

5. Kuruvilla, J. and Mattoso, L.H.C. (1998). In: Mattoso, L.H.C., Leao, A. and Frollini, Elisabete(eds), Natural Polymers and Composites, 333 ISNAPOL 2000.

6. Biastioli, C. (1995). In: Scott, Gerald and Gilead, Dan, (eds), Degradable Polymers, Principles and Applications: Starch-polymer Composites, p. 112. Chapman and Hall .

7. Karian, H.G. and Stoops, K. (1998). Polymer Composites, 19,1: 31

8. Wilson, P.I. (1978). Sisal, Vol. 2. In: Hard Fibers Research Series, No. 8, FAO, Rome .

9. Rowell, R.M. (1992). In: Rowell, R.M, Schultz, T.P. and Narayan, R. (eds), Emerging Technologies for Materials & Chemicals for Biomass , ACS Symposium Ser., 476: 12 .

10.

10. Joseph, K, Thomas, S. and Pavithran, C. (1996). Polymer, 37: 5139 .

11.

11. Chand, N. and Hashmi, S.A.R. (1993). Metals Materials and Processes, 5: 51 .

12.

12. Zhou, L.M., Mai, Y.-W., Ye, L. and Kim, J.K. (1995). Techniques for Evaluating Interfacial Properties of Fiber-matrix Composites , Key Engineering Materials, 104-107, 549-600 .

13.

13. Kim, J.K, Zhou, L.M. and Mai, Y.-W. (1993). Journal of Materials Science, 28: 3923 .

14.

14. Li, H., Zadorecki, P. and Flodin, P. (1987). Polymer Composites; 8: 199 .

15.

15. Cyras, V.P., Iannace, S., Kenny, J.M. and Vázquez, A.A. (2001). Polymer Composites, 22(1): 104 .

16.

16. US Patent 5.412.005.

17.

17. Vallo, C.I. (2000). Polymer Int.; 49: 831 .

18.

18. Chateuminois, A., Vincent, L., Chabert, B. and Soulier, J.P. (1994). Polymer, 35: 4766 .

19.

19. Crank, J. (1970). In: The Mathematics of Diffusion. London: Oxford University Press . (Chapters IV, V and VI.)

20.

20. Shen, C.H. and Springer, G.S. (1981). In: Springer, G.S. (ed.), Environmental Effects on Composite Materials, Chapter 12, Technomic Publishing Comp. Inc, USA .

21.

21. Standard Test Methods for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness and Energy Release Rate Determination of Plastics Materials, ASTM D 5045-93, American Society for Testing and Materials , 1993.

22.

22. Nielsen, L.E. (1974). In: Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites, Vol. 2, Marcel Dekker (ed.), New York .

23.

23. Bowyer, H.W and Bader, M.G. (1972). J. Mater. Sci., 7: 1315 .