A Methodology to Obtain a Desired Filling Pattern during Resin Transfer Molding

Abstract

In Resin Transfer Molding (RTM), dry spot formation and air entrapment during the filling stage often lead to defective parts and high scrap rate. These problems are usually caused by improper design of inlet conditions and vent locations that prevent the Last Point to Fill (LPF) location from coinciding with the preset vent location. Use of direct filling simulation as a design tool for the RTM process often involves trial-and-error procedures in order to find the appropriate inlet conditions and locations as well as exit vent locations. This design procedure becomes complex when adesign involving multiple inlet gates is being considered, especially in large parts. There may also be uncertainty as to whether the final design (obtained using trial-and-error simulation procedures) is indeed the optimum design.

This paper presents a methodology to design the RTM process with a desired filling pattern free of dry spots and knitlines. Unlike the traditional filling simulation that predicts the filling pattern using prescribed inlet conditions and the specification of the preform permeability field, this methodology calculates the optimum inlet conditions based on the specification of the desired filling pattern and the prescription of preform permeability. The use of this algorithm greatly enhances

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Gabriel, R. (Sep 1994). RTM: The next generation targets body panels. Plastics Technology, 46–48.

2. Bruschke, A. and Advani, S.G. (1990). A finite element/control volume approach to mold filling in anisotropic porous media. Polymer Composites, 11: 398–405.

3. Young, W.B. et al (1991). Analysis of resin injection molding in molds with preplaced fiber mats II: numerical simulation and experiments of mold filling. Polymer Composites, 12: 30–38.

4. Lin, R. , Lee, L.J. and Liou, M. (1991). Non-isothermal mold filling and curing simulation in thin cavities with preplaced fiber mats. Int. Polymer Processing, VI: 356–369.

5. Young, W. (1994). Three-dimensional nonisothermal mold filling simulation in resin transfer molding. Polymer Composites, 15: 118–127.

6. Chan, A. and Hwang, S. (1991). Modeling of the impregnation process during resin transfer molding. Polymer Engineering and Science, 31: 1149–1156.

7. Maier, R.S. et al (1996). A fast numerical method for isothermal resin transfer mold filling. Int.J. for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 39: 1405–1417.

8. Hourng, L. and Chang, C. (1993). Numerical simulation of resin injection molding in molds with preplaced fiber mats. J. of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 12: 1081–1095.

9. Um, M. and W. Lee (1991). A study on the mold filling process in resin transfer molding. Polymer Engineering and Science, 31: 765–771.

10.

10. Voller, V.R. and Peng, S. (1995). An algorithm for analysis of filling in polymer molding. Polymer Engineering and Science, 35: 1758-1758.

11.

11. Voller, V.R. , Peng, S. and Chen, Y.F. (1996). Numerical solutions of transient free surface problems in porous media. Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 39: 1405-1405.

12.

12. Voller, V.R. and Chen, Y.F. (1996). Prediction of filling time of porous cavity. Int. J. of Numerical Methods for Fluids, 23: 661-661.

13.

13. Chen, Y.F. , Voller, V.R. and Stelson, K.A. (1997). Prediction of filling time and vent locations for resin transfer molds. J. Composites Materials, 31: 1141–1161.

14.

14. Young, W.B. (1994). Gate location optimization in liquid composite molding using genetic algorithm. J. Composite Materials, 28: 1098–1113.

15.

15. Yu, H.W. and Young, W.B. (1997). Optimal design of process parameters for resin transfer molding. J. Composites Materials, 31: 1113–1140.

16.

16. Baliga, B.R. and Patankar, S.V. (1983). A control volume finite element method for twodimensional fluid flow and heat transfer. Num. Heat Transfer, 6: 245–261.

17.

17. Seber, G.A.F. (1989). Nonlinear Regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

18.

18. Tiller, M.M. , Tortorelli, D.A. and Dantzig, J.A. (1994). Optimal design of nonlinear parabolic systems-part 1: fixed spatial domain with applications to process optimization. Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 113: 141-141.

19.

19. Vanderplaats, G.N. (1984). Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.