Thick-Sectioned RTM Composite Manufacturing: Part I – In Situ Cure Model Parameter Identification and Sensing

Abstract

In the present work, we validate experimentally the cure simulation of a thick-sectioned composite processed by resin transfer molding (RTM). The simulation was based on an improved version of the model equations presented previously [Michaud, D.J., Beris, A.N. and Dhurjati, P.S. (1998). Curing behavior of thick-sectioned RTM composites. J. Compos. Mat., 32(14): 1273–1296.]. The presence of fiber reinforcement was found to significantly impact the curing behavior of the resin, leading to significant changes from the neat resin kinetic parameters. Thus, experimental processing data from seven 2.54 cm thick laminates were used to characterize the composite’s heat transfer and kinetic model parameters not readily computable from pure component values. The apparent initial concentration of inhibitor additives within the resin system decreased almost 80%, possibly due to absorption on the fiber surfaces. The presence of fibers was also found to reduce the extent of polymerization within the system. Key heat transfer model parameters, for both uncured and cured states, were also identified from experimental data. The importance of considering batch to batch variations and the temperature dependence of the resulting model parameters is discussed. In addition to the development and validation of the RTM cure simulation, heat flux sensors (HFSs)were evaluated as a nonintrusive sensor to replace internal thermocouples as a means of measuring internal cure behavior within a thick-sectioned composite.

Keywords

thermoset composites resin transfer molding thick laminates cure modeling heat flux sensors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Gutowski, T. , Henderson, R. and Shipp, C. (1991). Manufacturing costs for advanced composites aerospace parts. SAMPE Journal, 27(3): 37–43.

2. McConnell, V.P. and Strover, D. (1995). Advanced composites: performance materials of choice for innovative products. High-Performance Composites 1995 Source Book. pp. 8–19.

3. Bogetti, T.A. and Gillespie, Jr. J.W. (1991). Two-dimensional cure simulation of thick thermosetting composites. J. Compos. Mat., 25(3): 239–273.

4. Hanks, D.E. , Lee, M.C. , Young, R.C. and Tajima, Y.A. (1988). Processing science of thicksection composites. SAMPE Quarterly, 19(2): 19–28.

5. Ciriscioli, P.R. , Springer, G.S. and Lee, W.I. (1991). An expert system for autoclave curing of composites. J. Compos. Mat., 25(12): 1542–1587.

6. Pillai, V.K. , Beris, A.N. and Dhurjati, P.S. (1997). Intelligent curing of thick composites using a knowledge-based system. J. Compos. Mat., 31(1): 22–51.

7. Joseph, B. , Hanratty, F.W. and Kardos, J.L. Model based control of voids and product thickness during autoclave curing of carbon/epoxy composite laminates. J. Compos. Mat., 29(8): 1000–1024.

8. Michaud, D.J. , Beris, A.N. and Dhurjati, P.S. (1998). Curing behavior of thick-sectioned RTM composites. J. Compos. Mat., 32(14): 1273–1296.

9. Maistros, G.M. and Partridge, I.K. (1998). Monitoring autoclave cure in commercial carbon fibre/epoxy composites. Composites: Part B, 29B: 245–250.

10.

10. Johnson, S.A. and Roberts, N.K. (1989). Production implementation of fully automated, closed loop cure control for advanced composite structures. In: Proceedings of the 34th International SAMPE Symposium. Reno, Nevada, May 8–11. pp. 373–384.

11.

11. Michaud, D.J. , Beris, A.N. and Dhurjati, P.S. (2001). Thick-sectioned RTM composite manufacturing: part II. Robust cure cycle optimization and control. Submitted to J. Compos. Mat.

12.

12. Michaud, D. (2000). Simulation-based design optimization and control of thick composite laminates manufactured by resin transfer molding. PhD Dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.

13.

13. Bruschke, M.V. and Advani, S.G. (1990). A finite element/control volume approach to mold filling in anisotropic porous media. Polymer Composites, 11(6): 398–405.

14.

14. Young, W. (1994). Gate location optimization in liquid composite molding using genetic algorithms. J. Compos. Mat., 28(12): 1098–1113.

15.

15. Boccard, A. , Lee, W.I. and Springer, G.S. (1995). Model for determining the vent locations and the fill time of resin transfer molds. J. Compos. Mat., 29(3): 306–333.

16.

16. Chen, Y.F. , Stelson, K.A. and Voller, V.R. (1997). Prediction of filling time and vent locations for resin transfer molds. J. Compos. Mat., 31(11): 1141–1161.

17.

17. Mathur, R. , Fink, B.K. and Advani, S.G. (1999). Use of genetic algorithms to optimize gate and vent locations for the resin transfer molding process. Polymer Composites, 20(2): 167–178.

18.

18. Tan, C.P. and Springer, G.S. (1999). Composite manufacturing: simulation of 3-D resin transfer molding. J. Compos. Mat., 33(18): 1716–1742.

19.

19. Bickerton, S. and Advani, S.G. (1999). Characterization and modeling of race-tracking in liquid composite molding processes. Composites Science and Technology, 59: 2215–2229.

20.

20. Dowding, K. , Beck, J. , Ulbrich, A. , Blackwell, B. and Hayes, J. Estimation of thermal properties and surface heat flux in carbon-carbon composite. Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, 9(2): 345–351.

21.

21. Kamal, M.R. and Sourour, S. (1973). Kinetics and thermal characterization of thermoset cure. Polym. Eng. Sci., 13(1): 59–64.

22.

22. Lam, P.W.K. , Plaumann, H.P. and Tran, T. (1990). An improved kinetic model for the autocatalytic curing of styrene-based thermoset resins. J. Appl. Poly., 41: 3043–3057.

23.

23. Flory, P.J. (1953). Principles of Polymer Chemistry. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

24.

24. Odian, G. (1991). Principles of Polymerization. 3rd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

25.

25. Lem, K.W. and Han, C.D. (1983). Chemorheology of thermosetting resins. II. Effect of particulates on the chemorheology and curing kinetics of unsaturated polyester resin. J. Appl. Poly., 28(10): 3185–3206.

26.

26. Palmese, G.R. , Andersen, O.A. and Karbhari, V.M. (1999). Effect of glass fiber sizing on the cure kinetics of vinyl ester resins. Composites: Part A, 30: 11–18.

27.

27. Ishida, H. and Koenig, J.L. (1979). An investigation of the coupling agent/matrix interface of fiberglass reinforced plastics by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed., 17: 615–623.

28.

28. Fletcher, R. (1965). Function minimization without evaluating derivatives – a review. The Computer Journal, 8(1): 33–41.

29.

29. Rosenbrock, H.H. (1960). An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function. The Computer Journal, 3(3): 175–185.

30.

30. Swann, W.H. (1972). Chapter 2 –Direct search methods. In: Murray, W. (ed.), Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization. New York: Academic Press. pp. 13–28.

31.

31. Springer, G.S. and Tsai, S.W. (1967). Thermal conductivities of unidirectional materials. J. Compos. Mat., 1: 166–173.

32.

32. Farmer, J.D. and Covert, E.E. (1995). Thermal conductivity of an anisotropic thermosetting advanced composite during cure. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics – Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials, 5(36): 2939–2949.

33.

33. Mijovic, J. and Wang, H.T. (1988). Modeling of processing of composites part II – temperature distribution during cure. SAMPE Journal, 24(2): 42–55.

34.

34. Press, W.H. , Flannery, B.P. , Teukolsky, S.A. and Vetterling, W.T. (1988). Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. New York: Cambridge University Press.