AbellS. K. & SmithD. C. (1992). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science, in HillsS., The History and Philosophy of Science in Science Education (Vol. 1), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, 11–22.
2.
AickenF. (1984). The nature of science. London: Heinemann.
3.
AlexanderD. (1972). Beyond science. New York: A.J. Holman Co.
4.
AltersB.J. (1997). Whose nature of science?Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 34(1): 39–55.
5.
BlakelyR. E. (1987). A comparative study of Georgia middle school teachers' understanding of the nature of science. Ph.D. dissertation. Georgia University.
6.
BorriniG. (1985). Health and development: A marriage of heaven and hell?Studies In Third World Societies. 34: 3–54.
7.
BriscoeC. (1993). Using cognitive referents in making sense of teaching: A chemistry teacher's struggle to change assessment practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching30, 971–987.
8.
BurbulesN.C. & LinnM.C. (1991). Science education and philosophy of science: Congruence or contradiction?International Journal of Science Education13(3), 227–241.
9.
CarinA. A. & SundR. B. (1970). Teaching modern science. Ohio: A Bell & Howell Company.
10.
ChengK.M. (1995). Discussions about religious schools. Hong Kong education under political changes. Hong Kong: O.U.P. (manuscript in Chinese).
11.
ClouserR.A. (1991). Genesis on the origin of the human race. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith. 43(1): 2–8.
12.
CobernW. (1994). Point: Belief, understanding, and the teaching of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 583–590.
13.
CriswellW. A. (1972). Did man just happen?Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House.
14.
DeckardS. (1995). An educational step in the right direction. Impact. 270: 1–4.
DuschlR. A. (1988). Abandoning the scientistic legacy of science education. Science Education, 72, 14–22.
17.
FischerR. B. (1981). God did it, but how?Michigan: Zondervan.
18.
FischerR. B. (1990). Lecture notes on “The integration of faith, learning and living”. Biola summer program in Hong Kong, Biola University, La Mirada.
19.
GaleG. (1979). Theory of science: An introduction to the history, logic, & philosophy of science. McGraw-Hill.
20.
GeorgeT. H. (1987). A teenager's view of the nature of science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 282742).
21.
GuttingG. (1980). Paradigms and revolutions. Notre Dame: University of Nortre Dame Press.
22.
HallE. W. (1956). Modern science and human values. New York: D. Van Nostrand.
23.
HoK.K. (1996). The past, present and future of the religious schools in Hong Kong. Compare. 26(1): 51–59.
24.
H. K. Exam. Authority. (1996). Hong Kong Advanced Level Exam. Syllabus 1996. H. K.: Government Printer.
25.
HordernW. (1978). Theological dialogue, In The living God reading in Christian theology. EricksonM. J. (Ed.), MI: Baker, 47–57.
26.
HoustonJ. (1984) Is it reasonable to believe in God?Great Britain: The Handsel Press.
27.
KuhnT. S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago
28.
LakinS. & WellingtonJ. (1994). Who will teach the “Nature of Science”? Teachers' views of science and their implications for science education. International Journal of Science Education16(2), 175–190.
29.
LambertK. & BrittanG.G. (1970). An introduction to the philosophy of science. N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
30.
LedbetterC. E. (1987). An investigation of the theoretical orientations of eighth grade students and their teachers to science. Ph.D. dissertation. Texas A & M University.
31.
LedermanN. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
32.
Theological dialogue, In The living God reading in Christian theology. EricksonM. J. (Ed.), MI. Baker, 47–57.
33.
LoweM. D. (1991). Rethinking urban transport, In State of the World 1991. BrownL. R. (Ed.), New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 56–73.
34.
MelladoV. (1997). Preservice teachers' classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science and Education, 6, 331–354.
35.
MidgleyM. (1985). Evolution as a religion: Strange hopes and strange fears. NY: Methuen.
36.
MoonR.E. (1989). Toward seeing science in the light: A view from the cave. Ed.D. dissertation. Temple University.
37.
MorelandJ. P. (1989). Christianity and the nature of science. Michigan: Baker.
38.
MorelandJ. P. (1987). Scaling the secular city. Michigan: Baker, 185–223.
39.
MorrisH.M. (1993). History of modern creationism, Master Book.
40.
NagelE. (1961). The structure of science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
41.
NewmanJ. (Ed.) (1955). What is science. NY: Washington Square.
42.
OwenC. B. (1964). Methods for science masters, ELBS.
43.
PalmquistB.C. & FinleyF.N. (1997). Preservice teachers' views of the nature of science during a post-baccalaureate science teaching program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 34(6): 595–615.
44.
PattonA. R. (1962). Science for the non-scientist. MN: Burgess Publishing Company.
45.
PeltoPertti & Gretel. (1983). Culture, nutrition and health, In Romanucci-RossL.. (Eds.) The anthropology of medicine. MA: Bergin and Garvey.
46.
PorterR. & SamovarL. (Eds.) (1982). Approaching intercultural communication, In Intercultural communication: A reader, CA: Wadsworth, 15–30.
47.
RobertsM. B. V. (1986). Biology—a functional approach, ELBS.
48.
StonerP. W. (1963). Science speaks: An evaluation of certain Christian evidences. Chicago: Moody Press.
49.
TobinK. & McRobbieC. J. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science & Education, 6, 355–371.
50.
WaveringM. J. (1990). What do prospective science teachers understand about the nature of science? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 319 603).
51.
WeilE. (1965). Science in modern culture, In science and culture. GeraldH. (Ed.), Boston: Beacon. 199–217.