Abstract
In the context of the HCFC-141b phase out, the two candidates HFC-365mfc and HFC-245fa have been selected over the last few years, as reported in previous papers.
Since our last presentation, a lot of work has been performed to increase our knowledge of these new products and to study their behavior in various applications.
Although HFC-365mfc and HFC-245fa are promising candidates, a single HFC blowing agent cannot match all the outstanding characteristics of traditional fluorocarbon blowing agents: right boiling point, non flammability, cost effectiveness..., to name but a few. It is very unlikely that a single blowing agent will cover all the future needs of the polyurethane industry. Such a trend is already seen today with at least seven physical blowing agents finding commercial applications in the different sectors of the industry (HCFC-141b, HCFC-22/HCFC-142b, HFC-134a, cyclopentane, pentane or isopentane).
The main reason why HFC blowing agents will be used in the future is their ability to give foams with optimized thermal conductivity. However, because of possible condensation phenomena at low temperature for relatively high boiling blowing agents, the rating of different blowing agents is a function of temperature.
We have now measured foam thermal conductivity over the temperature range between -20°C and +45°C for several blowing agents, including HFC-245fa, HFC-365mfc, pentane isomers and blends thereof. Included in this study are the newly discovered low boiling azeotropes of HFC-365mfc with all three pentane isomers.
In this paper, we will especially show that the evolution of thermal conductivity with temperature can be a very good selection criteria to find the most appropriate blend for a specific application.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.