In this study, mechanical characteristics of pre-strained polyisocyanurate foam were investigated based on the uniaxial compression test. The compression test procedure was divided into two steps: pre-straining and the typical compression test for the recovered specimen. To evaluate the effect of pre-straining, four different compressive strains were considered, and the temperature and the strain rate dependencies on its mechanical characteristics were analyzed. Test results showed that the recovery ratio decreased substantially for 0.85 (ambient temperature) and 0.25 (cryogenic temperature), and polyisocyanurate foam pre-strained at cryogenic temperature revealed an earlier start of densification. Based on the deformation mechanism of the polymeric foam, the collapse of cells in the pre-strained polyisocyanurate foam was addressed to explain the distinguished features in compressive mechanical characteristics regarding test conditions.
ChunMSKimMHKimWS, et al. Experimental investigation on the impact behavior of membrane-type LNG carrier insulation system. J Loss Prev. Process Ind2009; 22: 901–907.
2.
KimMHLeeSMLeeJM, et al. Fatigue strength assessment of MARK-III type LNG cargo containment system. Ocean Eng2010; 37: 1243–1252.
3.
KimJHKimSKLeeCS, et al. A constitutive equation for predicting the material nonlinear behavior of AISI 316L, 321, and 347 stainless steel under low-temperature conditions. Int J Mech Sci2014; 87: 218–225.
4.
KimJHKimSKKimMH, et al. Numerical model to predict deformation of corrugated austenitic stainless steel sheet under cryogenic temperatures for design of liquefied natural gas insulation system. Mater Des2014; 57: 26–39.
5.
KimSKKangKYKimMS, et al. Low-temperature mechanical behavior of super duplex stainless steel with sigma precipitation. Metals2015; 5: 1732–1745.
6.
LeeCSChunMSKimMH, et al. Debonding failure characteristics of multi-laminated bonding system under cryogenic temperature. Int J Adhes Adhes2011; 31: 226–237.
7.
KimJHParkDHLeeCS, et al. Effect of cryogenic thermal cycle and immersion on the mechanical characteristics of phenol-resin bonded plywood. Cryogenics2015; 72: 90–102.
8.
SiegmannAKenigSAlpersteinD, et al. Mechanical behavior of reinforced polyurethane foams. Polym Compos1983; 4: 113–119.
9.
TuZHShimVPWLimCT.Plastic deformation modes in rigid polyurethane foam under static loading. Int J Solids Struct2001; 38: 9267–9279.
10.
ZenkertDBurmanM.Tension, compression and shear fatigue of a closed cell polymer foam. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 785–792.
11.
ParkSBLeeCSChoiSW, et al. Polymeric foams for cryogenic temperature application: temperature range for non-recovery and brittle-fracture of microstructure. Compos Struc2016; 136: 258–269.
12.
ViotPBeaniFLatailladeJL.Polymeric foam behavior under dynamic compressive loading. J Mater Sci2005; 40: 5829–5837.
13.
BouixRViotPLatailladeJL.Polypropylene foam behavior under dynamic loadings: strain rate, density and microstructure effects. Int J Impact Eng2009; 36: 329–342.
14.
SahaMCMahfuzHChakravartyUK, et al. Effect of density, microstructure, and strain rate on compression behavior of polymeric foams. Mater Sci Eng A2005; 406: 328–336.
15.
AvalleMBelingardiGMontaniniR.Characterization of polymeric structural foams under compressive impact loading by means of energy-absorption diagram. Int J Impact Eng2001; 25: 455–472.
16.
BezaziAScarpaF.Mechanical behavior of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio thermoplastic polyurethane foams under compressive cyclic loading. Int J Fatigue2007; 29: 922–930.
17.
DanielIMChoJM.Characterization of anisotropic polymeric foam under static and dynamic loading. Exp Mech2011; 51: 1395–1403.
18.
BezaziAScarpaF.Tensile fatigue of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio open cell PU foams. Int J Fatigue2009; 31: 488–494.
19.
RamsteinerFFellNForsterS.Testing the deformation behavior of polymer foams. Polym Test2001; 20: 661–670.
20.
RittelDAdiabatic shear failure of a syntactic polymeric foam. Mater Lett2005; 59: 1845–1848.
21.
ZhangSDulieu-BartonJMFruehmannRK, et al. A methodology for obtaining material properties of polymeric foam at elevated temperatures. Exp Mech2012; 52: 3–15.
22.
LeeCSLeeJM.Failure analysis of reinforced polyurethane foam-based LNG insulation structure using damage-coupled finite element analysis. Compos Struct2014; 107: 231–245.
23.
ChenKTianCLiangS, et al. Effect of stoichiometry on the thermal stability and flame retardation of polyisocyanurate foams modified with epoxy resin. Polym Degrad Stabil2018; 150: 105–113.
24.
ThomasSDattaJHaponiukJ, et al. Polyurethane polymers: composites and nanocomposites. 1st ed.Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2017.
25.
DanielKFrischKC.Handbook of polymeric foams and foam technology. Vol. 404. Munich: Hanser Publications, 1991.
26.
UlrichHJ.Recent Advances in Isocyanurate Technology. Cell Plast1981; 17: 31–34.
27.
GibsonLJ.Biomechanics of cellular solids.J Biomech2005; 38: 377–399.
28.
ThorntonPHMageeCL.The deformation of aluminum foams. Metall Mater Trans A1975; 6: 1253–1263.
29.
ParkSBChoiSWKimJH, et al. Effect of the blowing agent on the low-temperature mechanical properties of CO2- and HFC-245fa-blown glass-fiber-reinforced polyurethane foams. Compos Part B Eng2016; 93: 317–327.
30.
OuelletSCroninDWorswickM.Compressive response of polymeric foams under quasi-static, medium and high strain rate conditions. Polym Test2006; 25: 731–743.
