In this work, the foaming process was employed to achieve lightweight thermoplastic polyurethane materials, and then the hysteresis and residual strain of corresponding materials in the tensile process were quantitatively calculated. In order to study the deformed mechanism, the influences of cell type and skin-core structure on the tensile elasticity of thermoplastic polyurethane foam were investigated. The open-cell thermoplastic polyurethane foam exhibited much lower hysteresis and residual strain compared to thermoplastic polyurethane film without cell structure, which demonstrated that the open-cell structure benefited to the tensile elasticity. In the case of closed-cell thermoplastic polyurethane foam, it had lower hysteresis and residual strain than thermoplastic polyurethane film; however, higher value than the thermoplastic polyurethane film can be observed beyond 100% strain, resulting from the stress concentration in the skin-core structure. Consequently, the hysteresis phenomenon can be improved by adjusting the ratio of skin-core structure. Moreover, the influence of density on the elasticity of the open-cell thermoplastic polyurethane foam was also discussed in this study.
ShiXLiLOstrovidovS, et al.
Stretchable and micropatterned membrane for osteogenic differentiation of stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2014;
6: 11915–11923.
2.
ZhangRDengHValencaR, et al.
Strain sensing behaviour of elastomeric composite films containing carbon nanotubes under cyclic loading. Compos Sci Technol2013;
74: 1–5.
3.
TangYZhaoZHuH, et al.
Highly stretchable and ultrasensitive strain sensor based on reduced graphene oxide microtubes-elastomer composite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2015;
7: 27432–27439.
4.
LiuWChenZZhouG, et al.
3D porous sponge-inspired electrode for stretchable lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater Weinheim2016;
28: 3578–3583.
5.
MiH-YJingXSalickMR, et al.
Morphology, mechanical properties, and mineralization of rigid thermoplastic polyurethane/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue applications: effects of fabrication approaches and hydroxyapatite size. J Mater Sci2014;
49: 2324–2337.
6.
CharlonMHeinrichBMatterY, et al.
Synthesis, structure and properties of fully biobased thermoplastic polyurethanes, obtained from a diisocyanate based on modified dimer fatty acids, and different renewable diols. Eur Polym J2014;
61: 197–205.
7.
RussoPLavorgnaMPiscitelliF, et al.
Thermoplastic polyurethane films reinforced with carbon nanotubes: the effect of processing on the structure and mechanical properties. Eur Polym J2013;
49: 379–388.
8.
DuttaJChatterjeeTDharaG, et al.
Exploring the influence of electron beam irradiation on the morphology, physico-mechanical, thermal behaviour and performance properties of EVA and TPU blends. RSC Adv2015;
5: 41563–41575.
BuckleyCPPrisacariuCMartinC.Elasticity and inelasticity of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers: sensitivity to chemical and physical structure. Polymer2010;
51: 3213–3224.
11.
RogulskaMKultysAPodkościelnyW.Studies on thermoplastic polyurethanes based on new diphenylethane-derivative diols. II. Synthesis and characterization of segmented polyurethanes from HDI and MDI. Eur Polym J2007;
43: 1402–1414.
12.
BartoloméLAurrekoetxeaJUrcheguiMA, et al.
The influences of deformation state and experimental conditions on inelastic behaviour of an extruded thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer. Mater Design2013;
49: 974–980.
13.
DanCHLeeMHKimYD, et al.
Effect of clay modifiers on the morphology and physical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane/clay nanocomposites. Polymer2006;
47: 6718–6730.
14.
BarickAKTripathyDK.Effect of nanofiber on material properties of vapor-grown carbon nanofiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU/CNF) nanocomposites prepared by melt compounding. Compos Part A Appl S2010;
41: 1471–1482.
15.
ChenYLiYXuD, et al.
Fabrication of stretchable, flexible conductive thermoplastic polyurethane/graphene composites via foaming. RSC Adv2015;
5: 82034–82041.
16.
RamôaSBarraGMOOliveiraRVB, et al.
Electrical, rheological and electromagnetic interference shielding properties of thermoplastic polyurethane/carbon nanotube composites. Polym Int2013;
62: 1477–1484.
17.
WangX-CJingXPengY-Y, et al.
The effect of nanoclay on the crystallization behavior, microcellular structure, and mechanical properties of thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposite foams. Polym Eng Sci2016;
56: 319–327.
18.
SunXKharbasHTurngL-S.Fabrication of highly expanded thermoplastic polyurethane foams using microcellular injection molding and gas-laden pellets. Polym Eng Sci2015;
55: 2643–2652.
19.
MiH-YJingXPengJ, et al.
Influence and prediction of processing parameters on the properties of microcellular injection molded thermoplastic polyurethane based on an orthogonal array test. J Cell Plast2013;
49: 439–458.
20.
YehS-KLiuY-CWuW-Z, et al.
Thermoplastic polyurethane/clay nanocomposite foam made by batch foaming. J Cell Plast2013;
49: 119–130.
21.
ItoSMatsunagaKTajimaM, et al.
Generation of microcellular polyurethane with supercritical carbon dioxide. J Appl Polym Sci2007;
106: 3581–3586.
22.
GeCRenQWangS, et al.
Steam-chest molding of expanded thermoplastic polyurethane bead foams and their mechanical properties. Chem Eng Sci2017;
174: 337–346.
23.
GibsonLJAshbyMF.Cellular solids: structure and properties. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175–179.
24.
RamsteinerFFellNForsterS.Testing the deformation behaviour of polymer foams. Polym Test2001;
20: 661–670.
25.
KabirMESahaMCJeelaniS.Tensile and fracture behavior of polymer foams. Mat Sci Eng A2006;
429: 225–235.
26.
OnckPRAndrewsEWGibsonLJ.Size effects in ductile cellular solids. Part I: modeling. Int J Mech Sci2001;
43: 681–699.
27.
LingJZhaiWFengW, et al.
Facile preparation of lightweight microcellular polyetherimide/graphene composite foams for electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2013;
5: 2677–2684.
28.
ZhaiWYuJHeJ.Ultrasonic irradiation enhanced cell nucleation: an effective approach to microcellular foams of both high cell density and expansion ratio. Polymer2008;
49: 2430–2434.
29.
JiGZhaiWLinD, et al.
Microcellular foaming of poly(lactic acid)/silica nanocomposites in compressed CO2: critical influence of crystallite size on cell morphology and foam expansion. Ind Eng Chem Res2013;
52: 6390–6398.
30.
KumarVWellerJE.A model for the unfoamed skin on microcellular foams. Polym Eng Sci1994;
34: 169–173.
31.
ZhaiWLeungSNWangL, et al.
Preparation of microcellular poly(ethylene-co-octene) rubber foam with supercritical carbon dioxide. J Appl Polym Sci2010;
116: 1994–2004.
32.
GeCZhaiW.Cellular thermoplastic polyurethane thin film: preparation, elasticity, and thermal insulation performance. Ind Eng Chem Res2018;
57: 4688–4696.
33.
GeCWangSZhengW, et al.
Preparation of microcellular thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) foam and its tensile property. Polym Eng Sci2017;
58: E158–E166.
34.
YeQXiangYChenF, et al.
The formation of regular porous polyurethane membrane via phase separation induced by water droplets from ultrasonic atomizer. Mater Lett2013;
100: 23–25.
35.
MadkourTMHagagFMMamdouhW, et al.
Molecular-level modeling and experimental investigation into the high performance nature and low hysteresis of thermoplastic polyurethane/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Polymer2012;
53: 5788–5797.
36.
TokiSSicsIBurgerC, et al.
Structure evolution during cyclic deformation of an elastic propylene-based ethylene-propylene copolymer. Macromolecules2006;
39: 3588–3597.
37.
CalvertKLTrumbleKPWebsterTJ, et al.
Characterization of commercial rigid polyurethane foams used as bone analogs for implant testing. J Mater Sci: Mater Med2010;
21: 1453–1461.
MatuanaLM.Solid state microcellular foamed poly(lactic acid): morphology and property characterization. Bioresour Technol2008;
99: 3643–3650.
40.
MillerDKumarV.Microcellular and nanocellular solid-state polyetherimide (PEI) foams using sub-critical carbon dioxide II. Tensile and impact properties. Polymer2011;
52: 2910–2919.
41.
NayakNCTripathyDK.Morphology and physical properties of closed cell microcellular ethylene-octene copolymer: effect of precipitated silica filler and blowing agent. J Appl Polym Sci2002;
83: 357–366.
42.
SunXZhangGShiQ, et al.
Study on foaming water-swellable EPDM rubber. J Appl Polym Sci2002;
86: 3712–3717.
43.
JoCFuJNaguibHE.Constitutive modeling for mechanical behavior of PMMA microcellular foams. Polymer2005;
46: 11896–11903.
44.
DianiJFayolleBGilorminiP.A review on the Mullins effect. Eur Polym J2009;
45: 601–612.
45.
QiHJBoyceMC.Stress-strain behavior of thermoplastic polyurethanes. Mech Mater2005;
37: 817–839.
WeaireDFortesMA.Stress and strain in liquid and solid foams. Adv Phys1994;
43: 685–738.
50.
KhorasaniMTShorgashtiS.Fabrication of microporous thermoplastic polyurethane for use as small-diameter vascular graft material. I. Phase-inversion method. J Biomed Mater Res B2006;
76B: 41–48.
