Use of Real-time FTIR to Characterize Kinetics of Amine Catalysts and to Develop New Grades for Various Polyurethane Applications,Including Low Emission Catalysts

Abstract

The use of in situ Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) to follow PU reaction kinetics has been studied using a heated probe matching the PU material temperature. The results obtained show that, although not giving access to concentration of formed chemical bonds, the technique is a unique tool to assess subtle differences in catalysts behavior during actual PU formation, going beyond the currently used but restrictive characterization of catalysts in terms of gelling, blowing or trimerization grades.

Examples of the use of the technique for the development of new amine catalysts are given for flexible and rigid foams.

For flexible foams, it is shown that FTIR characterizes the gel potency in good agreement with the behavior of known gel catalyst molecules and is therefore a good tool to develop new ones. Results comparing gel strength and foam emission data show that several experimental grades have potential to be brought on the JEFFCAT® Catalyst range. They also confirmed the good performance of commercial low emission grades such as JEFFCAT® ZF-10 as blow catalyst and JEFFCAT® ZR-50, DPA and Z-130 as gel catalysts.

For rigid foams, it is shown that FTIR provides good insight into the extent of trimer formation and is therefore the technique of choice to optimize catalyst blends for best fire performance and processing.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Saunders, J.H. and Frish, K.C. (1962). Polyurethanes Chemistry and Technology, High Polymers , Vol. XVI, Part I.

2. Malwitz, N. and Kresta, J.E. (1988). J. Cell. Plast., 24: 495-495 .

3. Malwitz, N.et al. (1987). J. Cell. Plast., 23: 461-461 .

4. Wong, S-W. and Frish, K.C. (1986). J. Polym. Sc., Pol. Chem. Ed., 24: 2867-2867 .

5. Thielle, L. and Becker, R. (1993). Adv. Ureth. Sc. Techn., 12: 59-59 .

6. Listeman, M.L. (1992). J. Cell. Plast., 28: 360-360 .

7. Listeman, M.L.et al. (1993). Presented at the SPI Annual Polyurethanes Conf., p. 595-595 .

8. Borsus, J.M.et al. (1982). J. Appl. Polym. Sc., 27: 4029-4029 .

9. McClusky et al. (1993). Presented at the SPI Annual Polyurethanes Conf., p. 507-507 .

10.

10. McDaniel, P.L.et al. (1999). Presented at the API Annual Polyurethanes Expo. Conf., p. 303-303 .

11.

11. Thomson, M.A., Melling, P.J. and Slepski, A.M. (2001). Polym. Prep., 42(1): 310-311 .

12.

12. Burns, S.B., and Schmidt, E.L. (1993). Presented at the SPI Annual Polyurethanes Conf., p. 234-234 .

13.

13. Clift, S.M., Grimmiger, J. and Muha, K. (1994). Presented at the SPI Annual Polyurethanes Conf., p. 546-546 .

14.

14. Yokoyama, T. (1978). Adv. Uret. Sc. Techn., 6: 1-1 .

15.

15. Colemans, M.M.et al. (1986). Macromol., 19: 2149-2157 .

16.

16. Yamamoto, T.Shibayama, M. and Nomura, S. (1989). Polym. J., 21(11): 895-903 .

17.

17. Ning, L., De-Ning, W. and Sheng-Kang, Y. (1996). Polymer, 37(14): 3045-3047 .

18.

18. Teo, L-S., Chen, C-H. and Kuo, J-F. (1997). Macrom., 30: 1793-1799 .

19.

19. Ning, L., De-Ning, W. and Sheng-Kang, Y. (1997). Macromol., 30: 4405-4409 .

20.

20. Broos, R., Hennington, R.M. and Casati, F.M. (1999). Presented at the API Annual Polyurethanes Expo Conf., p. 347-347 .

21.

21. Yontz, D.J. (1999). PhD. Thesis, Amherst University, p. 89-95.

22.

22. Zimmerman, R.L.et al. (2000). Presented at the UTECH 2000 Conference.

23.

23. Humbert, H.H. et.al. (1997). RAPRA Technology Limited, Paper 4, pp. 1-2.