Bizzell, P. (1982). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre/Text, 3, 213-243.
2.
Bruffee, K.A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the "Conversation of mankind." College English, 46, 635-652.
3.
Cooper, M. (1989). Why are we talking about discourse communities? Or, foundationalism rears its ugly head once more. In M. Cooper & M. Holtzman (Eds.), Writing as a social action (pp. 202-220). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton-Cook.
4.
Faigley, L. (1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 231-248). New York: Guilford Press.
5.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
6.
Gross, A.G. (1990). The rhetoric of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Harris, J. (1989). The idea of community in the study of writing . College Composition and Communication, 40, 11-22.
8.
Katz, S.M. (1998). The dynamics of writing review: Opportunities for growth and change in the workplace. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
9.
Kent, T. (1991). On the very idea of a discourse community. College Composition and Communication, 42, 425-445.
10.
Killingsworth, M.J., & Gilbertson, M.K. (1992). Signs, genres, and communities in technical communication. AmityvilleNY: Baywood.
11.
Porter, J.E. (1986). Intertextuality and the discourse community. Rhetoric Review, 5, 34-47.
12.
Porter, J.E. (1992). Audience and rhetoric: An archaelogical composition of the discourse community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
