Does the quality of a communication process or product matter? This paper
provides an approach to answering that question. The author provides a work
ing definition of communication quality that focuses on its technical, functional
(use), and aesthetic components and posits a discrepancy-based approach to
assessing quality. Based on that analysis, the author develops testable, theoreti
cal propositions that predict relationships among communication quality,
effectiveness, and efficiency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzen, I., Brown, T.C., & Rosenthal, L.H. (1996, January). Information bias in contingent valuation: Effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(1), 43-57.
2.
Allen, M.W., & Brady, R.M. (1997, February). Total quality management, organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, and intraorganizational communication . Management Communication Quarterly, 10(3), 316-341.
3.
Aristotle. (1932). The rhetoric of Aristotle: An expanded translation with supplementary examples for students of composition and public speaking. (Lane Cooper, Trans.). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts . (Original work composed. 4th century BC)
4.
Artz, E.L. (1992, October 1). Redefining quality: The new relationship between quality, price and value. Keynote address summary: The quality forum VIII. New York.
5.
Bogert, J. (1989, February). Improving the quality of writing in the workplace: A case study. Management Communication Quarterly , 2(3), 328-356.
6.
Bohner, G., Crow, K., Erb., M.-P., & Schwarz, N. (1992, November-December). Affect and persuasion: Mood effects on the processing of message content, and context cues, and on subsequent behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(6), 511-530.
7.
Bonsiepe, G. (1965). Visual-Verbal rhetoric. ULM, 14-16, 23-41.
8.
Catanach, A.H., Jr., & Golen, S. (1996, December). A user-oriented focus to evaluating accountants' writing skills. Business Communication Quarterly, 59(4), 111-121.
9.
Charney, D.H., Rayman, J., & Ferreira-Buckley, L. (1992, January). How writing quality influences readers' judgments of résumés in business and engineering . Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6(1), 38-74.
10.
Daniel, C.A. (1983, Summer). Remembering our charter: Business communication at the crossroads. The Journal of Business Communication, 20(3), 3-11.
11.
de Jong, M., & Schellens, P.J. (1997, October). Reader-focused text evaluation: An overview of goals and methods. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11(4), 402-432.
12.
Dixon, T.C., & Gardiner, R.B. (1992). Quality management in higher education. Australian Journal of Communication, 19(1), 107-129.
13.
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
14.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
15.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and researchReading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Funkhouser, G.R. (1983, Summer). Functional evaluation of consumer documents . The Journal of Business Communication, 20(3), 59-71.
17.
Gagliardi, P. (1996). Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 565-80). London : Sage.
18.
Garvin, D.A. (1984, Fall). What does "product quality" really mean ? Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25-43.
19.
Geest, T. v. d., & Schellens, P. J. (Eds.). (1997, October). Formative evaluation of professional documents [Special issue]. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11(4).
20.
Goldman, A. (1993, January). Implications of Japanese total quality control for western organizations: Dimensions of an intercultural hybrid. The Journal of Business Communication, 30(1), 29-47.
21.
Goodin, E.H., & Swerdlow, K. (1987, March). The current quality of written correspondence: A statistical analysis of the performance of 13 industry and organizational categories. The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication , 50(1), 12-14.
22.
Hagge, J. (1996, October). Ethics, words, and the world in Moore's and Miller's accounts of scientific and technical discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10(4), 461-475.
23.
Hale, J.L., Lemieux, R., & Mongeau, P.A. (1995). Cognitive processing of fear-arousing message content. Communication Research, 22(4), 459-474.
24.
Harcourt, J., Richerson, V., & Wattier, M.J. (1991, Fall). A national study of middle managers' assessment of organizational communication quality. The Journal of Business Communication, 28(4), 348-365.
25.
Hartwell, P. (1985, February). Grammar, grammars, and the teaching of grammar. College English, 47(2), 105-127.
26.
Hauser, J.R., & Clausing, D. (1988, May/June). The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, 66(3), 63-73.
27.
Hilton, C.B., Motes, W.H., & Fielden, J.S. (1989, Summer). An experimental study of the effects of style and organization on reader perceptions of text. The Journal of Business Communication, 26(3), 255-270.
28.
Hoeken, H. (1994). Evaluating persuasive texts: The problems of how and what to measure. In L. van Waes, E. Woudstra & P. van den Hoven (Eds.), Functional communication quality, Utrecht studies in language & communication (pp. 76-87). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
29.
Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is total quality control? The Japanese way (D. J. Lu, Trans.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
Johnson, B.T., & Eagly, A.H. (1989, September). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 290-314.
31.
Jones, K.C. (1997). Customer satisfaction: A key to financial success in the managed care environment. Journal of Health Care Finance , 23(4), 21-32.
32.
Juran, J.M., & Gryna, F.M., Jr. (1980). Quality planning and analysis: From product development through use. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Juran, J.M. (1989). Juran on leadership for quality: An executive handbook. New York: The Free Press .
34.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979, March). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
35.
Kostelnick, C. (1990, January). Typographical design, modernist aesthetics, and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 4(1), 5-24.
36.
Krampen, M. (1965). Signs and symbols in graphic communication. Design Quarterly, 62, 4-31.
37.
Kreth, M., Miller, C.R., & Redish, J. (1996, October). Comments on "Instrumental discourse is as humanistic as rhetoric." Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10(4), 476-490.
38.
Leonard, D.J., & Gilsdorf, J.W. (1990, Spring). Language in change: Academics' and executives' perceptions of usage errors. The Journal of Business Communication, 27(2), 137-158.
39.
Locker, K.O. (1995). Business and administrative communication (3rd ed.). Chicago: Irwin.
40.
Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990, August). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361-367.
41.
Margolin, V. (1989). Introduction. In V. Margolin (Ed.), Design discourse: History/theory/criticism (pp. 3-28). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
Meyerowitz, F.E., & Chaiken, S. (1987, March). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.
43.
Moore, P. (1996a, January). Instrumental discourse is as humanistic as rhetoric. Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 10(1), 100-118.
44.
Moore, P. (1996b, October). A response to Miller and Kreth. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10(4), 491-502.
45.
Mumby, D.K., & Stohl, C. (1996, August). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(1), 50-72.
46.
Pearce, C.G., & Barker, R.T. (1991, Spring). A comparison of business communication quality between computer written and handwritten samples. The Journal of Business Communication, 28(2), 141-151.
47.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
48.
Petty, R.E., Schumann, D.W., Richman, S.A., & Strathman, A.J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high- and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64, 5-20.
49.
Putnam, L.L. (1983). The interpretive perspective: An alternative to functional-ism. In L. L. Putnam & M. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 31-54). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
50.
Reinsch, N.L., Jr. (1990, Summer). Ethics research in business communication: The state of the art. The Journal of Business Communication , 27(3), 251-272.
51.
Reinsch, N.L., Jr. (1996). Business communication: Present, past, and future. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(1), 27-49.
52.
Rothman, A.J., & Salovey, P. (1997, February). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin , 121(1), 3-19.
53.
Rothman, A.J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C.D. (1993, September). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 29(5), 408-433.
54.
Seitz, P. (1965). Editor's note. Design Quarterly , 62, 3.
55.
Sengstock, C.A., Jr. (1991, August). Pursuing the not-so-elusive goal of perfection. Public Relations Journal, 47(8), 22-23.
56.
Shelby, A.N. (1986, Winter). The theoretical bases of persuasion: A critical introduction. The Journal of Business Communication , 23(1), 5-29.
57.
Shelby, A.N. (1988, Spring). A macro theory of management communication . The Journal of Business Communication, 25(2), 13-27.
58.
Shelby, A.N. (1991, Summer). Applying the strategic choice model to motivational appeals: A theoretical approach. The Journal of Business Communication, 28(3), 187-212.
59.
Shelby, A.N. (1994). Communication quality as metacommunication: A conceptual analysis. In L. van Waes, E. Woudstra, & P van den Hoven (Eds.), Functional communication quality, Utrecht studies in language and communication (pp. 5-16). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
60.
Siegel, A. (n.d.). Simple is smart. Promotional brochure.
61.
Slater, M.D., & Rouner, D. (1996, April). Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Communication Research, 23(2), 210-235.
62.
Smeltzer, L.R., & Thomas, G.F. (1994, April). Managers as writers: A meta-analysis of research in context. Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 8(2), 186-211.
63.
Smith, S.M., & Petty, R.E. (1996, March). Message framing and persuasion: A message processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 22(3), 257268.
64.
Suchan, J., & Dulek, R. (1990, August). A reassessment of clarity in written managerial communications. Management Communication Quarterly, 4(1), 87-99.
65.
Teboul, J. (1991). Managing quality dynamics. New York: Prentice Hall.
66.
Thiessen, E.A. (1977, Winter). Communication media used and difficulties experienced by selected Kansas business firms. The Journal of Business Communication, 14(2), 43-48.
67.
Townsend, P.L., & Gebhardt, J.E. (1986). Commit to quality. New York: Wiley.
68.
Young, M.C. (1978, Fall). Four problems relating to awareness of metacommunication in business correspondence. The Journal of Business Communication , 16(1), 39-47.
