Dulek, R.E. (1993, July). Models of development: Business schools and business communication. The Journal of Business Communication , 30(3), 315-331.
2.
Hagge, J. (1986). Business communication, the orphaned discipline: A historical review of business communication teachers' perception of their field's place in the college curriculum. Proceedings of the 51st ABC international conventionLos Angeles: Association for Business Communication.
3.
Locker, K.O. (1994, April). The challenge of interdisciplinary research . The Journal of Business Communication, 31(2), 137-151.
4.
Mumby, D.K., & Stohl, C. (1996, August). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(1), 50-72.
5.
Reardon, K.K. (1996, August). The crossroads of organizational communication: Definition or dichotomy. Management Communication Quarterly , 10(1), 106-111.
6.
Reinsch, N.L., Jr. (1996, August). Business communication: Present, past, and future. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(1), 27-49.
7.
Rentz, K. (1993, July). Editorial: Negotiating the field of business communication. The Journal of Business Communication, 30(3), 233-240.
8.
Selfe, C.L. (1994, Winter).The task of predicting the future in technical and professional communication programs: Listening to the stories of a new generation of Ph.D. graduates. ATTW Bulletin, 5(1), 9-12.
9.
Shaw, G. (1993, July). The shape of our field: Business communication as a hybrid discipline. The Journal of Business Communication , 30(3), 297-313.
10.
Shelby, A. (1996, August). A discipline orientation: Analysis and critique. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(1), 98-105.
11.
Smeltzer, L.R. (1996, August). Communication within the manager's context . Management Communication Quarterly, 10(1), 5-26.
12.
Yates, J. (1993). The opportunity of qualitative research. The Journal of Business Communication, 30(2), 199-200.