This article analyzes the communicative activities of a project team in a large
corporation in the computer industry. Through research based on a broad
definition of text that includes both written and oral communicative acts and an
analysis of interpersonal interaction in project team meetings over a six month
period of time, the author explores the relationship of written text and authority
in a corporate setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bakhtin, M./Voloshinov, V.N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. (L. Matejka & I. Titunik, Trans.). New York: Seminar Press.
2.
Blyler, N.R., & Thralls, C. (1993). Professional communication: The social perspective . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Clark, G. (1990). Dialogue, dialectic, and conversation: A social perspective on the function of writing. Carbondale, IL : Southern Illinois University Press.
4.
Couture, B., & Rymer, J. (1991). Discourse interaction between writer and supervisor: A primary collaboration in workplace writing. In M. Lay & W. Karis (Eds.), Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice (pp. 87-108). Amityville, NY: Baywood Press.
5.
Cross, G. (1990). A Bahktian exploration of factors affecting the collaborative writing of an executive letter of an annual report. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 173-202.
6.
Doheny-Farina, S. (1991). Creating a text/creating a company: The role of a text in the rise and decline of a new organization. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 306-335). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
7.
Faigley, L. (1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in Nonacademic Settings (pp. 231-248). New York: Guilford.
8.
Fimbel, N. (1994). Communicating realistically: Taking account of politics in internal business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 31, 7-26.
9.
Hansen, C. (1992). Communication technologies in corporate settings . Bulletin of the Association of Business Communication, 55(4), 3-9.
10.
Herndl, C. (1991). Writing ethnography: Representation, rhetoric, and institutional practices. College English, 53, 320-332.
11.
LeFevre, K.B. (1987). Invention as a social act. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press .
12.
Malone, E. (1991). Facilitating groups through selective participation: An example of collaboration from NASA. In M. Lay & W. Karis (Eds.), Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice (pp. 109-119). Amityville, NY: Baywood Press.
13.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
Morgan, T. (1986). Is there an intertext in this text?: Literary and interdisciplinary approaches to intertextuality. American Journal of Semiotics, 3(4), 1-40.
15.
Spilka, R. (1990). Orality and literacy in the workplace: Process and text-based strategies for multiple-audience adaptation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 4, 44-67.
16.
Stygall, G. (1991). Texts in oral contexts: The 'transmission' of jury instructions in an Indiana trial. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 234-255). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
17.
Thralls, C. (1992). Rites and ceremonials: Corporate video and the construction of social realities in modern organizations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6, 381-402.
18.
Winsor, D. (1989). An engineer's writing and the corporate construction of knowledge. Written Communication, 6, 270-285.
19.
Witte, S. (1992). Context, text, intertext: Toward a constructivist semiotic of writing. Written Communication, 9, 237-308.
