A laboratory experiment investigated how the dimensionality of computer-
generated graphs affects users' abilities to extract information from the graphs.
Two-dimensional graphs were found to be more reliable in communicating infor
mation quickly and accurately than corresponding three-dimensional graphs. A
surprising finding was that a commonly used, but technically incorrect, three-
dimensional graph performed better than its corrected version.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Addo, T.B.A. (1989). Development of a valid and robust metric for measuring question complexity in computer graphics experimentation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington.
2.
Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, networks, maps . (W. J. Berg, Trans.). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. (Original work published 1967.)
3.
Bray, J.H., & Maxwell, S.E. (1985). Multivariate analysis of variance. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
4.
Davis, L.R. (1985). The effects of question complexity and form of presentation on the extraction of question-answers from an information presentation . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington.
5.
Davis, L.R., Groomer, S.M., Jenkins, A.M., Lauer, T.W., & Yoo, K. (1985, July). Content validation of a metric of question complexity. Indiana University Discussion Paper #292.
6.
Desanctis, G. (1984). Computer graphics as decision aids: Directions for research. Decision Sciences15, 463-487.
7.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice . New York: Basic Books.
8.
Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences . New York: Basic Books.
9.
Huck, S.W., Cormier, W.H., & Bounds, W.G. (1974). Reading statistics and research. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
Ives, B. (1982, December). Graphical user interfaces for business information systems. MIS Quarterly [Special issue], pp. 15-47.
11.
Jarett, I.M. (1983). Computer graphics and reporting financial data . New York: John Wiley & Sons .
12.
Jarvenpaa, S.L. (1989). The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies. Management Science35, 285-303.
13.
Jenkins, A.M. (1983). MIS design variables and decision making performanceAnn Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press .
14.
Keppel, G., & Saufley, W.H. (1980). Introduction to design and analysis. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Company.
15.
Kostelnick, C. (1988). A systematic approach to visual language in business communication. The Journal of Business Communication25(3), 29-48.
16.
Lauer, T.W. (1986). The effect of variations in information complexity and form of presentation on performance of an information extraction task . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Indiana University, Bloomington.
17.
Leeuwenberg, E.L.J. (1968). Structural information of visual patterns: An efficient coding system in perception. The Hague: Mouton & Co.
18.
Lindman, H.R. (1974). Analysis of variance in complex experimental designs . San Francisco: W.H.Freeman & Co.
19.
Lindquist, E.F. (1953). Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.
20.
Orne, M.T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist17, 776-783.
21.
Smeltzer, L.R., & Vance, C.M. (1989). An analysis of graphic use in audio-graphic teleconferences . The Journal of Business Communication26(2), 123-141.
22.
Tufte, E. (1983). The visual display of quantitative data. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
23.
Vickers, D. (1979). Decision processes in visual perception. New York: Academic Press.
24.
Wilson, E.V., & Addo, T.B.A. (1994). An investigation of the relative presentation efficiency of computer-displayed graphs. Information & Management26, 105-115.
25.
Yates, J. (1985). Graphs as a managerial tool: A case study of DuPont's use of graphs in the early twentieth century. The Journal of Business Communication22(1), 5-33.
