This paper offers a Burkean framework for study of collaborative business writing. It
begins with a review of the research and scholarship on collaborative writing by com
position and by business and technical communication specialists. Then it explains a
Burkean framework that identifies key areas for future investigation and provides
categories for conducting research. Finally, it argues for a research agenda that em
phasizes qualitative studies first, to be followed by quantitative research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, N., Atkinson, D., Morgan, M., Moore, T., & Snow, C. (1987). What experienced collaborators say about collaborative writing. Iowa State Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 1(2), 70-90.
2.
Beard, J.D., Rymer, J., & Williams, D.L. (1989). An assessment system for collaborative-writing groups: Theory and empirical evaluation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 3(5), 29-51.
3.
Beard, J.D. & Rymer, J. (Eds.). (1990). Collaborative writing in business communication. The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(2).
4.
Bovee, C.L. & Thill, J.V. (1989). Business communication today (2nd ed.). New York: Random House .
5.
Brown, L.D. (1984). Managing conflict among groups. In D.A. Kolb, I.M. Rubin, & J.M. McIntyre (Eds.), Organizational psychology: Readings on human behavior in organizations (4th ed.) (pp. 225-237). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
6.
Bruffee, K.A. (1972). The way out: A critical survey of innovations in college teaching, with special reference to the December, 1971 issue of College English. College English, 33, 457-470.
7.
Bruffee, K.A. (1973). Collaborative learning: Some practical models . College English, 34, 634-643.
8.
Bruffee, K.A. (1980). A short course in writing. Cambridge: Winthrop.
9.
Bruffee, K.A. (1981). The structure of knowledge and the future of liberal education. Liberal Education, 67, 177-185.
10.
Bruffee, K.A. (1982). Liberal education and the social justification of belief. Liberal Education, 68, 95-114.
11.
Bruffee, K.A. (1983). Writing and reading as collaborative or social acts. In J. Hays, P.A. Roth, J.R. Ramsey, & R.D. Foulke (Eds.), The writer's mind: Writing as a mode of thinking. Urbana: NCTE, 159-169.
12.
Bruffee, K.A. (1986). Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay. College English, 48, 773-790.
13.
Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley : University of California Press.
14.
Cohen, A.R., Fink, S., Godon, H., & Willits, R. (1980). Effective behavior in organizations. Homewood: Irwin.
15.
Couture, B. & Rymer, J. (1989). Interactive writing on the job: Definitions and implications of collaboration. In M. Kogen (Ed.), Writing in the business professions (pp. 73-93). Urbana : NCTE.
16.
Couture, B. & Rymer, J. (in press). Discourse interaction between writer and supervisor: A primary collaboration in workplace writing. In M.M. Lay & W.M. Karis (Eds.), Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice . Amityville: Baywood.
17.
Cross, G.A. (1990). A Bakhtinian exploration of factors affecting the collaborative writing of an effective letter of an annual report. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 173-203.
18.
Culnan, M.J. & Markus, M.L. (1987). Information technologies. In F.M. Jablin, L.L. Putnam , K.H. Roberts, & L.W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
19.
Doheny-Farina, S. (1986). Writing in an emerging organization. Written Communication, 3, 158-185.
20.
Ede, L. & Lunsford, A. (1986). Collaborative learning: Lessons from the world of work. Journal of the Council of Writing Program Administrators , 9(3), 17-26.
21.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
22.
Faigley, L. (1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 231-248). New York: Guilford Press.
23.
Faigley, L. & Miller, T.P. (1982). What we learn from writing on the job. College English, 44, 557-569.
24.
Fisher, B.A. (1986). Leadership: When does the difference make a difference ? In R.Y. Hirokawa & M.S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 197-215). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
25.
Forman, J. (1989). The discourse communities and group writing practices of management students. In C. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing (pp. 247-254). New York: Random House.
26.
Forman, J. (1990). Leadership dynamics of computer-supported writing groups. Computers and Composition, 7(2), 35-46.
27.
Forman, J. (1991). Novices work on group reports: Problems in group writing and in computer-supported group writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 5(1), 48-75.
28.
Forman, J. (in press-a). Computing and collaborative writing: Issues for the 90s . In G. Hawisher & C. Selfe (Eds.), Questions for the next decade: Computers and composition.
29.
Forman, J. (Ed.) (in press-b). New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook .
30.
Forman, J. (n.d.) Student task groups and their writing: Relationships between group characteristics and group written products. Research in progress at the Anderson Graduate School of Management at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
31.
Forman, J. & Katsky, P. (1986). The group report: A problem in small group or writing processes? The Journal of Business Communication, 23(4), 23-35.
32.
Forman, J. with Kelly, K.A. (1990). The Random House guide to business writing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Gersick, C.J.G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal , 31, 9-41.
34.
Gersick, C.J.G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274-309.
35.
Golub, J. (Ed.). (1988). Focus on collaborative learning. Urbana: NCTE.
36.
Halpern, J.W. (1988). Getting in deep: Using qualitative research in business and technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2(2), 22-43.
37.
Hare, A.P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
38.
Horton, M., Rogers, P., Austin, L., Brimm, D., & McCormick, M. (1991). The impact of face-to-face collaborative technology on group writing. Hawaii International Conference for System Sciences Proceedings.
39.
Janis, I. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton-Mifllin.
40.
Jewell, L.N. & Reitz, H.J. (1988). Group effectiveness in organizations. New York: Free Press.
41.
Johansen, R. (1988). Groupware: Computer support for business teams . New York: Free Press.
42.
Karis, B. (1989). Conflict in collaboration: A Burkean perspective . Rhetoric Review, 8, 113-126.
43.
Katz, R. (1978). Job longevity as a situational factor in job satisfaction . Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 204-223.
44.
Katz, R. (1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 81-104.
45.
Lay, M.M. (1989). Interpersonal conflict in collaborative writing: What we can learn from gender studies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 3(2), 5-28.
46.
Lay, M.M. (in press). The androgynous collaborator: The impact of feminist theory on collaboration. In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth : Boynton/Cook.
47.
Lay, M.M. and Karis, W.M. (Eds.) (in press). Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice. Amityville: Baywood.
48.
Likert, R. (1984). The nature of highly effective groups. In D.A. Kolb, I.M. Rubin, & J.M. McIntyre (Eds.). Organizational psychology: Readings on human behavior in organizations (4th ed.) (pp. 155-166). Englewood Cliffs : Prentice-Hall.
49.
Locker, K.O. (1989). Business and administrative communication. Homewood: Irwin.
50.
Locker, K.O. (in press). What makes a collaborative writing team successful? A case study of lawyers and social workers in a state agency. In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook . Lunsford, A. & Ede, L. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale : Southern Illinois University Press. Markus, M.L. (in press). Asynchronous tools in small face-to-face groups. Information technology and people.
51.
McIsaac, C.M. & Aschauer, M.A. (1990). Proposal writing at Atherton Jordan, Inc. Management Communication Quarterly, 3(4), 527-560.
52.
McGrath, J. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
53.
Myers, G. (1985). Texts as knowledge claims: The social construction of two biologists' articles. Social Studies of Science, 15, 593-630.
54.
Odell, L. & Goswami, D. (Eds.). (1985). Writing in nonacademic settings . New York: Guilford Press.
55.
Odell, L. (1985). Beyond the text: Relation between writing and social context. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 249-280). New York: Guilford Press.
56.
Ouchi, W. (1981). Theory Z.: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. New York: Addison-Wesley .
57.
Paradis, J., Dobrin, D., & Miller, R. (1985). Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the writing environment of an R&D organization. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 281-307). New York: Guilford Press.
58.
Putnam, L.L. (1986). Conflict in group decision making. In R.Y. Hirokawa & M.S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 175-190). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
59.
Rogers, P. & Horton, M. (in press). Face-to-face collaborative writing. In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook .
60.
Schilb, J. (in press). The sociological imagination and the ethics of collaboration . In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook .
61.
Selfe, C. (in press). Computer-based conversations and the changing nature of collaboration. In J. Forman (Ed.). New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth : Boynton/Cook .
62.
Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
63.
Thralls, C. (in press). Bakhtin, collaborative partners, and published discourse: A collaborative view of composing. In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook.
64.
Trimbur, J. (1989). Consensus and difference in collaborative learning . College English, 51, 602-616.
65.
Trimbur, J. & Braun, L.A. (in press). Laboratory life and the determination of authorship. In J. Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook .
66.
Tuckman, B. & Jensen, M. (1977). Stages of small-group development. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.
67.
Weick, K.E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
