Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines the growth and scope of corporate benefits packages and their usefulness to the average worker. A sample of benefits packages from Fortune 500 cor porations was assessed, and results revealed that both the documents'readability and comprehensibility levels far exceed that of the average worker. The study builds on the recent and growing scholarly focus on "mass" business communications and proposes a number of promising avenues for future research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albrecht, T. (1979). The role of communication in perceptions of organizational climate In D. Nimmo (ed.), Communication yearbook 3. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

Albrecht, T. (1984). Managerial communication and work perception, in R. Bostrom (ed.), Communication Yearbook 8. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Barnett, A. , & Loeffler, K. (Spring 1979). Readability of accounting and auditing messages The Journal of Business Communication , 16(2), 49-59.

Berger, C. , & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some exploration in initial interaction and beyond: Towards a development theory of interpersonal communication Human Communication Research, 1 , 99-112.

Bormouth, J.R. (1962). Cloze tests and measures of readability and comprehension ability Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.

Burgoon, J. , Burgoon, H. , Miller, G.R. , & Sunnafrank, M. (1981). Learning theory approaches to persuasion Human Communication Research , 7, 161-179.

Business Week/Harris Poll (July 25, 1983). Health costs are out of control Business Week , 56.

Campbell, M.E. , & Hollmann, R.W. (1985, September-October). ABC = auditing business communications Business Horizons , 60-64.

Clampitt, P.G. , Crevcoure, J.M. , & Hartel, R.L. (1986, Summer). Exploratory research on employee publications The Journal of Business Communication , 23(3), 5-17.

10.

Coleman, E.B. , & Miller, G.R. (1968, Spring). Ameasure of information gained during prose learning Reading Research Quarterly , 3, 369-386.

11.

Courtis, J.K. (1987, Spring). Fry, smog, lix and rix: Insinuations about corporate business communications The Journal of Business Communication, 24, 19-27.

12.

Danowski, J.A. (1980). Group attitude uniformity and connectivity of organizational networks for production, innovation, and maintenance content Human Communication Research, 6, 299-308.

13.

Farace, R.V. , Monge, P. , & Stewart, J. (1978). Criteria for evaluation of organizational effectiveness: Review and synthesis In B. Ruben (ed.) Communication yearbook , 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

14.

Feuer, D. (1985, October). Where the dollars go Training : 45-46.

15.

Flesch, R. (1974). The Art of Readable Writing New York, Harper & Row.

16.

Flowers, V.S. , & Hughes, C.L. (1973, July-August). Why employees stay Harvard Business Review, 49-60.

17.

Fry, E. ( 1977, December). Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17 Journal of Reading , 21, 242-243.

18.

Funkhouser, G.R. (1983, Summer). Functional evaluation of consumer documents The Journal of Business Communication , 30(3), 59-71.

19.

Gilsdorf, J.W. (1987, Fall). Written corporate communication policy: Extent, coverage, costs, benefits The Journal of Business Communication, 24(4), 35-52.

20.

Green, W.M. (1984, January). Compensation and benefits Personnel Journal, 12-17.

21.

Heath, R.L. , & Phelps, G. (1984, Summer). Annual Reports II: Readability of reports vs. business press Public Relations Review , X(2), 56-61.

22.

Hottenhouse, G. , Lewellen, W.G. , Lanser, H.P. , & James, H.L. (1975, November-December). Communicating the compensation package Personnel, 19-30.

23.

Hoskins, R.L. (1984, Summer). Annual reports I: Difficult reading and getting more so Public Relations Review , X(2) , 49-55.

24.

Huber, V.L. (1983, January). Training and development: Not always the best medicine Personnel, 12-15.

25.

Huseman, R.C. , & Hatfield, J.D. (1978, Summer). Communicating employee benefits: Directions for future research The Journal of Business Communication, 15(4), 3-15.

26.

Huseman, R.C. , Hatfield, J.D. , & Driver, R.W. (1978, October). Getting your benefit programs understood and appreciated Personnel Journal, 560-578.

27.

Karlinsky, S.S. , & Koch, B.S. (1983, Fall). Readability is in the mind of the reader The Journal of Business Communication , 20(4), 57-69.

28.

Klare, G.R. (1976, Summer). A second look at the validity of readability formulas Journal of Reading Behavior, 8, 129-152.

29.

Kossack, S.W. (1976). A mathematical reading inventory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation Athens: University of Georgia.

30.

Kuiper, S. (1988, Summer). Gender representation in corporate annual reports and perception of corporate climate The Journal of Business Communication, 25(4), 87-93.

31.

Lauer, J. , & Patterson, D.G. (1951). Readability of union contracts Personnel, 28(1), 36-40.

32.

McDonald, D. (1976). Communication roles and networks Human Communication Research, 2 , 365-375.

33.

McMillan, J. (1978, April). Taking stock of the options Personnel Journal, 32-37.

34.

Morgan, F.T. (1985, July). The linchpin in the effort to trim health care costs Personnel Journal, 70-73.

35.

Pashalian, S. , & Crissy, W.J.E. (1950). How readable are corporate annual reports? Journal of Applied Psychology , 34, 248.

36.

Pound, G.D. (1981, May). Note on audit report readability Australia, 21, 45-55.

37.

Reckers, P. , & Stagliano, A. (1980, Summer). State income tax forms: a test of readability Akron Business and Economic Review, 11, 42-46.

38.

Read, R. (January 1984). Is education the key to lower health care costs? Personnel Journal, 41-45.

39.

Reynolds, E.V. , & Johnson, J.D. (1982). Liaison emergence: Relating theoretical perspectives Academy of Management Review, 7, 551-559.

40.

Rodriguez, R.A. (1983, August). How to judge your pay care options Personnel Administrator, 41-44.

41.

Selzer, J. (1981, Fall). Readability is a four letter word The Journal of Business Communication, 18(4), 23-29.

42.

Schiller, H. (1981). Who Knows: Information in the age of the Fortune 500 Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

43.

Smith, J. , & Smith, N. (1971, July). Readability: Ameasure of the performance of the communication function of financial reporting Accounting Review, 46, 552-562.

44.

Solomon, B. (1984, November-December). Keeping health-care costs down, employee spirits up Personnel, 40-42.

45.

Soper, F.J. , & Dolphin, R. , Jr. (1964, April). Readability and corporate annual reports Accounting Review, 39(2), 358-362.

46.

Stead, B.A. (1977, Spring). Content analysis and readability formulas as applied to the accounting principles board opinions The Journal of Business Communication, 15(2), 23-34.

47.

Suchan, J. , & Scott, C. (1986, January-February). Unclear contract language and its effect on corporate culture Business Horizons , 20-25.

48.

Sutcliffe, J. , & Schuster, J. (1985, September). Benefits predicted Personnel Journal, 1962-1964.

49.

Swinburne Report (1981, October). Unpublished report, East Norwich, NY: Swinburne Readability Laboratory.

50.

Taylor, W. (1953). Cloze procedure: a new tool for measuring readability Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415-433.

51.

Tiffin, J. , & Walsh, F.X.

Readability of union-management agreements

Personnel Psychology , 4,(4), 327-338.

52.

Trapini, F. , & Walmsley, S. (1981). Five readability estimates: Differential effects of simplifying a document Journal of Reading , 24,(5).

53.

Tuinman, J.J. (1973-4). Determining the passage dependency of comprehension questions in five majors tests Reading Research Quarterly , 9, 206-223.

54.

Watts, G. (1983, December). Training and retraining workers will be an important challenge for unions in the 21st century Personnel Administrator, 82-84.

55.

Weis, W. (March 1981)Profits up in smoke Personnel Journal, 162-165.

56.

Woelfel, J. , & Haller, A. (1971). Significant others, the reflexive act, and the attitude formation process American Sociological Review , 36, 37-74.

Employee Benefit Packages: How Understandable Are They?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References