Language in Change: Academics' and Executives' Perceptions of Usage Errors

Abstract

A research study gauged the distraction potential of 45 written usage elements, tradi tionally considered errors, for systematic random samples of two different educated reading audiences: post-secondary business communication teachers and executive vice presidents in very large firms.

Findings showed that the usage errors least distracting to both audiences were lexical elements such as use of "disinterested" for "uninterested," the verb "prioritize," and "data" as a singular, as well as the use of an adverbial phrase to complete a linking verb. The most distracting errors were primarily sentence-structure errors such as run ons, fragments, danglers, and faulty parallel structure.

The findings are useful in two ways: They describe the reactions of educated users to language elements that may be in process of change; and they offer instructors more in formation to use as a basis for emphasizing or de-emphasizing certain usage elements in an already crowded communication course.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andera, F. , & Condon, G. (1986, Fall). The frequency of occurrence ofpunctuation rules, format, and English style in written business communications Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 28(4), 197-210.

Anderson, E. (1981, December). Language and success College English, 43(8), 807-817.

Baron, D.E. (1982 ). Grammar and good taste: Reforming the English language New Haven: Yale University Press.

Borroff, M. (1985, Spring). Fowler and the rest Yale Review, 74, 353-367.

Bush, D. (1972, Spring). Polluting our language American Scholar, 41(2), 238-247.

Connors, R.J. (1985, February). Mechanical correctness as a focus in composition instruction College English , 36(1), 61-72.

Connors, R.J. , & Lunsford, A.A. (1988, December). Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research College Composition and Communication , 39(4), 395-409.

Copperud, R.H. (1980). American usage and style: The consensus New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.

Daniels, H.A. (1983). Famous last words: The American language reconsidered Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

10.

Douglas, W.W. (1982). Finegan, Quinn, and Simon on usage (review-essay) College English, 44, 72-83.

11.

Finegan, E. (1980). Attitudes toward English usage: The history of a war of words New York: Teachers College Press.

12.

Goodin, E.H. , and Swerdlow, S. (1987, March). The current quality of written correspondence: A statistical analysis of the performance of 13 industry and organizational categories The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 50, 12-16.

13.

Gould, C. (1987, January). Josephine Turck Baker, Correct English and the ancestry of pop grammar English Journal , 76, 22-28.

14.

Greenbaum, S. (1988). Good English and the grammarian London and New York: Longman.

15.

Hairston, M. (1981, December). Not all errors are created equal: Nonacademic readers in the professions respond to lapses in usage College English, 43(8), 794-806.

16.

Harap, H. (1930, June). The most common grammatical errors English Journal, 19, 440-446.

17.

Hymes, Dell. (1980). Foreword In Shimanoff, S. B. (Ed.), Communication rules: Theory and research (pp. 9-27). Beverly Hills: Sage.

18.

MacNeil, R. (1986, September 14). It is not I but me, and I say: Leave American English alone! The New York Times Book Review , p. 41.

19.

Meyers, W.E. (1972, May). A study of usage items based on an examination of the Brown corpus College Composition and Communication , 23(2), 155-169.

20.

Mitchell, R. (1979). Less than words can say Boston : Little, Brown.

21.

Mittins, W.H. , Salu, M. , Edminson, N. , & Coyne, S. (1970). Attitudes to English usage London: Oxford University Press.

22.

Neuleib, J. , & Scharton, M. (1982, April). Grammar hotline College English, 44, 413-416.

23.

Newman, E. (1974). Strictly speaking Indianapolis : Bobbs Merrill.

24.

Newman, E. (1976). A civil tongue Indianapolis : Bobbs Merrill.

25.

Pickrel, P. (1985, March). Identifying cliches College English, 47(3), 252-261.

26.

Quinn, J. (1980). American tongue and cheek New York: Pantheon Books.

27.

Safire, W. (1980). On language New York: Times Books.

28.

Safire, W. (1982). What's the good word? °New York: Times Books.

29.

Safire, W. (1984). I stand corrected: More on language New York: Times Books.

30.

Safire, W. (1986). Take my word for it New York : Times Books.

31.

Safire, W. (1988). You could look it up: More on language New York: Times Books.

32.

Shaughnessy, M. (1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing New York: Oxford University Press.

33.

Simon, J.I. (1980). Paradigms lost: Reflections on literacy and its decline New York: C. N. Potter.

34.

Sklar, E.S. (1988, December). The tribunal of use: Agreement in indefinite constructions College Composition and Communication , 39(4), 410-422.

35.

Stalker, J.C. (1985). Language as symbol in the death-of-language books In Greenbaum, S. (Ed.) The English language today (pp. 65-71). Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press Ltd.

36.

Supnick, R.M. , & Rooney, P.S. (1985, Fall-Winter). A comparison of two methods for improving basic skills of business communication students Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 28(2), 117-122.

37.

Williams, J. (1981, May). The phenomenology of error College Composition and Communication, 32, 152-168.