A Channel-Ratio Model of Intercultural Communication

Abstract

Standard models of human communication do not highlight differences in message construction and channel use important for effective intercultural exchanges. A chan nel-ratio model of intercultural communication extends the application of the concept of high context /low context cultures and is configured so that it may accommodate the dynamics of a face-to-face interaction. Examples from intercultural focus groups and from the intercultural communication literature show the application of the model. The needs of business people in regard to simplicity, relevance, and completeness have been balanced in the construction of the model. The use of the model as a framework on which the student or business person can organize information is highlighted. Im plications for training and research and in intercultural communications are dis cussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asante, M.K. (1980). Intercultural communication: An inquiry into research directions. In Communication yearbook 4. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books, pp. 401-410.

Asante, M.K. , & Vora, E. (1983). Toward multiple philosophical approaches. In Intercultural communication theory. Beverly Hills : Sage Publications, pp. 293-298.

Berlo, D.K. (1960). The process of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Bowman, J.P. , & Targowski, A.S. (1987). Modeling the communication process: The map is not the territory. The Journal of Business Communication, 24(4), 21-34.

Campbell, D.P. , & Level, D. (1985). Ablack box model of communications. The Journal of Business Communication, 22(3), 37-47.

Ehrenhaus, P. (1983). Culture and the attribution process. In Intercultural communication theory (pp. 259-270). Beverly Hills : Sage Publications.

Ellis, A. , & Beattie, G. (1986). The psychology of language and communication. New York: The Guilford Press.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.

Gudykunst, W.B. (1983). Theorizing in intercultural communication. In Intercultural communication theory (pp.13-20). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

10.

Habermas, J. (1984). Intermediate reflections: Social action, purposive activity, and communication. In The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society, T. McCarthy, Trans Boston: Beacon Press.

11.

Hall, E.T. (1976). Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Press.

12.

Hartley, R.V.L. (1949). Transmission of information. Bell System Technical Journal, 28, 535.

13.

Kendon, A. (1984). Did gesture have the happiness to escape the curse at the confusion of Babel? In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Perspectives, applications, intercultural insights. Lewiston, NY: C. J. Hogrefe, Inc.

14.

Knapp, M.L. (1984). The study of nonverbal behavior vis—vis human communications theory. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Perspectives, applications, intercultural insights. Lewiston, NY: C. J. Hogrefe, Inc.

15.

Knapp, M.L. (1978) Nonverbal communication in human interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

16.

MacKay, D.M. (1972) Formal analysis of communicative processes. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.), Non-verbal communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Ruesch, J. , & Bateson, G. (1951). Communication: The social matrix of society. New York: W. W. Norton.

18.

Shannon, C. , & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

19.

Smith, R.L. (1962). General models of communication — Special Report No. 5. Summer Conference of the National Society for the Study of Communication.

20.

Spitzberg, B.H. , & Cupach, W.R. (1984). Interpersonal communication competence. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

21.

Stallings, W. (1985). Data and computer communications. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

22.

Targowski, A.S. , & Bowman, J.P. (1988). The layer-based, pragmatic model of the communication process. The Journal of Business Communication, 25(1), 5-24.

23.

Timm, P.R. (1986). Managerial communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

24.

Watzlawick, P. , Beavin, J.D. , & Jackson, D.D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

25.

Wolfgang, A. (1984). State of the art of nonverbal behavior in intercultural counselling. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Perspectives, applications, intercultural insights. Lewiston, NY: C. J. Hogrefe, Inc.