This paper reports the effectiveness of contemporary corporate annual report prose
communication. Four formulas not previously applied to the president's letter are used to
predict reading ease. The study found that a sample of 65 Canadian annual reports for
1984 were classified as "difficult" to "very difficult" and beyond the fluent comprehension
ease of 92 percent of the adult population and 56 percent of the investor population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J., "LIX and RIX: Variations on a Little-known Readability Index," Journal of Reading, pp. 490-96, March 1983.
2.
Bjornsson, C.H., "Readability of Newspapers in 11 Languages," Reading Research Quarterly, pp. 480-97, Summer 1983.
3.
Courtis, J.K., "Private Shareholder Response to Corporate Annual Reports," Accounting and Finance, pp. 53-72, November 1982.
4.
, " An Investigation Into Annual Report Readability and Corporate Risk-Return Relationships," Accounting and Business Research, forthcoming, Summer 1986.
5.
Dreyer, L.G., "Readability and Responsibility," Journal of Reading , pp. 334-38, January 1984.
6.
Fry, E., "A Readability Formula that Saves Time," Journal of Reading, pp. 513-16, 575-78, April 1968.
7.
Healy, P., "Can You Understand the Footnotes to Financial Statements?", The Accountants' Journal, pp. 219-22, July 1977.
8.
Irwin, J.W. and C.A. Davis, ''Assessing Readability: The Checklist Approach," Journal of Reading, pp. 124-30, November 1980.
9.
Klare, G.R., "Assessing Readability," Reading Research Quarterly , Vol. X, No. 1, pp. 63-102, 1974-75.
10.
Lee, T.A. and D.P. Tweedie, "Accounting Information: An Investigation of Private Shareholder Usage ," Accounting and Business Research, pp. 280-91, Autumn 1975.
11.
McConnell, C.R., "Readability Formulas as Applied to College Economics Textbooks," Journal of Reading, pp. 14-7, October 1982.
12.
McLaughlin, G.H., "SMOG—Grading—A New Readability Formula," Journal of Reading, pp. 639-46, May 1969.
13.
Parker, L.D., "Corporate Annual Reporting: A Mass Communication Perspective," Accounting and Business Research, pp. 279-86, Autumn 1982.
14.
Pashalian, S. and W.J.E. Crissy, "How Readable Are Corporate Annual Reports?", Journal of Applied Psychology, pp. 244-48, August 1950.
15.
Smith, J.E. and N.P. Smith, "Readability: A Measure of the Performance of the Communication Function of Financial Reporting," The Accounting Review, pp. 552-61, July 1971 .
16.
Soper, F.J. and R. Dolphin, "Readability and Corporate Annual Reports," The Accounting Review, pp. 358-62, April 1964.
17.
Still, M.D., "The Readability of Chairman's Statements," Accounting and Business Research, pp. 36-9, Winter 1972.
18.
Toronto Stock Exchange, Canadian Shareowners: Their Profile and Attitudes, Toronto, Ontario, p. 40, April 1984.
19.
Worthington, J., "Footnotes: Readability or Liability," CPA Journal , pp. 27-32, 1978.
