The literature on gender differences in managerial communications is strongly influenced
by folk-linguistics. This study used written managerial communications to test the quality
and stylistic differences purported to exist between genders . The gender of the sender and
the receiver did not have a significant effect on the style or quality of written communications.
Differences in communication styles between men and women may be limited to verbal and
nonverbal communication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barryman, C.L. "Attitudes Toward Male and Female Sex-Appropriate and Sex-Inappropriate Language," Communication Language and Sex. C. L. Barryman and V A. Eman (eds.), Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 1980.
2.
Bartol, Katherine. "The Sex Structuring of Organizations: A Search for Possible Causes ," The Academy of Management Review, 3, 1978, pp. 805-815.
3.
Bradley, P.H. "The Folk-Linguistics of Women's Speech: An Empirical Examination," Communication Monographs, 48, March 1981, pp. 73-89.
4.
Day, R. and R.M. Stogdill. "Leader Behavior of Male and Female Supervisors: A Comparative Study ," Personnel Psychology, 25, 1972, pp. 353-360.
5.
Eakins, B.W. and R.G. Eakins.Sex Differences in Human Communication, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1978.
6.
Fearing, F. "Toward a Psycyhological Theory of Human Communication," Journal of Personality, 22, 1953 , pp. 71-88.
7.
Flatley, M. "A Comparative Analysis of the Written Communication of Managers at Various Organizational Levels in the Private Business Sector," The Journal of Business Communication, 19, Summer 1982, pp. 35-50.
8.
Foss, K.A. and S.K. Foss. "The Status of Research on Women and Communication," Communication Quarterly, 31, Summer 1983, pp. 195-204.
9.
Gieselman, R.D. "Reading, Writing, and Research: Pedagogical Implications," The Journal of Business Communication, 19, 1982, pp. 23-38.
10.
Hamermesh, M. "Sharpening Old Saws: Speech-Act Theory and Business Communication ," The Journal of Business Communication, 18, Spring 1981, pp. 15-22.
11.
Henning, M. and A. Jardin.The Managerial Woman, Garden City, NJ : Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1976 .
12.
Hoenigswald, H.M. "A Proposal for the Study of Folk-linguistics," in Sociolinguistics, William Bright (ed.), Hague: Mouton, 1966, pp. 16-20.
13.
Holsti, O.R. "Content Analysis," in The Handbook of Social Psychology, G. Lindzey and E. Arronsen (eds.), Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
14.
Janeway, E.Man's World, Woman's Place. New York: Dell. 1981.
15.
Kanter, R.M. "The Impact of Hierarchical Structures on the Work Behaviors of Men and Women," Social Problems, 23, 1976, pp. 415-430.
16.
Key, M.R. "Linguistic Behavior of Male and Female," Linguistics , 88, 1972, pp. 15-31.
17.
Kramarae, C.Women and Men Speaking, Rawley, MA: Newbury House, 1981.
18.
Kramer, C. "Women's Speech: Separate but Unequal?" Quarterly Journal of Speech, 60, 1974, pp. 14-24.
19.
Kramer, C. "Folklinguistics," Psychology Today, 8, 1974, p. 22.
20.
Lahiff, J., and J.D. Hatfield. "The Winds of Change and Managerial Communication Practices ," The Journal of Business Communication, 15, Summer 1978, pp. 19-29.
21.
Lakoff, R. "Language and Woman's Place," Language in Society, 2, 1973, pp. 45-80.
22.
Lengel, Robert H. "Managerial Information Processing and Communication-Media Source Selection Behavior," unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, 1982.
23.
Lesikar, R.V.Business Communication: Theory and Applications. (4th edition), Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1980.
24.
Lewis, P.V.Organizational Communication: The Essence of Effective Management , (2nd edition), Columbus, OH : Grid Publishing, 1980.
25.
Liggett, S. "Speaking/Writing Relationships: Implications for Business Communication ," 1984 Proceedings Southwest ABCA, pp. 125-134.
26.
Osborn, R.N., andW.M. Vicars. "Sex Stereotypes: An Artifact in Leader Behavior and Subordinate Satisfaction Analysis?" Academy of Management Journal, 19, 1976, pp. 439-449.
27.
Pearce, G., R. Figgins, and S. Golen.Business Communication: Theory and Principles, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1984, p. 177, cases 14 and 15.
28.
Petty, M.N. and G.K. Lee. "Moderating Effects of Sex of Supervisor and Subordinate Relationships Between Supervisory Behavior and Subordinate Satisfaction," Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 1975, pp. 624-628.
29.
Roussell, C. "Relationships of Sex of Department Head to Department Climate," Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 1974, pp. 211-220.
30.
Schein, V. "Sex Role Stereotyping Ability and Performance," Personnel Psychology, 3, 1978, pp. 259-268.
31.
Shaughnessy, M.P.Errors and Expectations, New York: Oxford University Press, 1977, p. 25.
32.
Spender, D.Man Made Language, London: Routledge and Kegan, 1980.
33.
Stead, B. A. (ed.) Women in Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
34.
Swenson, D.H. "Relative Importance of Business Communication Skills for the Next Ten Years," The Journal of Business Communication, 17, 1980, pp. 41-50.
35.
Talley, M.A. and V.P. Richmond. "The Relationship Between Psychological Gender Orientation and Communication Style," Human Communication Research, Summer 1980, 327-339.
36.
Thorne, B. and N. Henley. "Differences and Dominance: An Overview of Learning, Gender, and Society," in B. Thorne and N. Henley (eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance, Rawley, MA: Newbury House, 1975, pp. 5-42.
37.
Warbois, G.M. "Validation of Externally Developed Assessment Procedures for Identification of Supervisory Potential," Personnel Psychology, 28, 1975, pp. 77-91.
