The Given-New Contract is a theory of information transfer that helps explain why
unified and cohesive paragraphs are essential for effective written communications.
The theory also suggests a practical methodology for the construction of unified and
cohesive paragraphs. The first part of this paper explains the theory of the Given-New
Contract, and the second part offers a strategy for teaching paragraph production that
is based on the theory of the Given-New Contract.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aulls, M. "Expository Paragraph Properties That Influence Recall," Journal of Reading Behavior, 7, 1975, 391-400.
2.
Berlin, J.A. "Contemporary Composition: The Major Pedagogical Theories." College English, 44, 1982, 765-77.
3.
Carpenter, P.A. and M.A. Just. "Integrative Processes in Comprehension." Basic Processes in Reading: Perception and Comprehension, David Laberge and S. Jay Samuels (eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977, 217-41.
4.
Clark, H.H. and Susan E. Haviland . "Comprehension and the Given-New Contract." Discourse Production and Comprehension, Roy O. Freedle (ed.), Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1977, 1-40.
5.
Firbas, J. "On Defining Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis." Travaux Linguistique de Prague, 3, 1966, 267-80.
6.
— "Non-Thematic Subjects in Contemporary English." Travaux Linguistique de Prague, 3, 1966, 239-56.
7.
Gagne, R. and V.K. Wiegand. "Effects of a Superordinate Context on Learning and Retention ." Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 1970, 406-409.
8.
Glatt, B.S. "Defining Thematic Progressions and Their Relationship to Reader Comprehension ." What Writers Know: The Language, Process, and Structure of Written Discourse, Martin Nystrand (ed.), New York: Academic Press, 1982, 87-103.
. " Logic and Conversation." Studies in Syntax, Vol. III, P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.), New York: Seminar Press, 1975, 253-65.
11.
Halliday, M.A.K. "Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: II." Journal of Linguistics, 3, 1967 , 199-244.
12.
— and R. Hasan.Cohesion in English. London: Longman Group Limited, 1976.
13.
Jakobson, R. "Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics." StyLe in Language, T. A. Sebeok (ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960,353-69.
14.
Kieras, D.E. "Good and Bad Paragraph Structure in Simple Paragraphs: Effects on Apparent Theme, Reading Time, and Recall." Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 1978,13-28.
15.
Moles, A.A.Information Theory and Esthetic Perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.
16.
Selzer, J. "Certain Cohesion Elements and the Readability of Technical Paragraphs ." Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12, 1982, 285-300.
