One of the problems groups face in making decisions is the unstructured
communication which limits the number of potential solutions the mem
bers propose. This paper evaluates the Nominal Group Technique as a
method for structuring a problem-solving group's communication. The
technique is evaluated in terms of its ability to produce more potential
solutions to a problem than an interacting group and in terms of the per
ceived satisfaction of the participants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Robert F. Bales. "In Conference," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 32, 1954, pp. 44-50.
2.
Andre L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de Ven. "A Group Process Model for Problem Identification and Program Planning," Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , Vol. 7, 1971, pp. 466-492.
3.
, and David H. Gustafson.Group Techniques for Program Planning, Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman, 1975 .
4.
Marvin D. Dunnette, John Campbell, and Kay Jaastad. "The Effect of Group Participation on Brainstorming Effectiveness for Two Industrial Samples," Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 47, 1963, pp. 30-37.
5.
A.C. Filley. "Committee Management: Guidelines from Social Science Research," California Management Review, Vol. 13, 1970, pp. 13-21.
6.
Thad B. Green. "An Empirical Analysis of Nominal and Interacting Groups," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 18, 1975, pp. 63-73. .
7.
" The Utilization of Nominal Grouping to Determining Training Needs." Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, 1974.
8.
—, Walter Newsome, and Len Welch. "Perceived Level of Group Satisfaction in Nominal and Interacting Groups," Proceedings of South-eastern AIDS Meeting, ed. by T. Anthony and A. Carroll.Columbia, SC, 1975.
9.
Thad B. Green and Paul Pietri. "Using Nominal Grouping to Improve Upward Communication ," MSU Business Topics, Vol. 22, 1974, pp. 37-43.
10.
C.L. Gruder. "Determinants of Social Comparison Choices," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 7, 1971, pp. 473-489.
11.
Richard C. Huseman. "Defining Communication Problems Within the Organizational Setting," Journal of Organizational Communications, Vol. 1, 1972, pp. 19-20.
12.
Richard C. Huseman, James Lahiff, and Robert Wells. "Communication Thermoclines: Toward A Process of Identification ," Personnel Journal, Vol. 53, 1974, pp. 124-135.
13.
A.P. Jacoby and N. Babchuck. "Instrumental and Expressive Voluntary Association," Sociology and Social Research, Vol. 47, 1963, pp. 461-471. H.
14.
C. Lindgren and F. Lindgren. "Brainstorming and Orneriness as Facilitators of Creativity ," Psychological Reports, Vol. 16, 1965, pp. 577-583.
15.
Larry E. Penley.A Comparison of Individual, Group and Combined Individual/Group Brainstorming as Used in Measuring Attitudes Toward the Police. Masters Thesis, Wake Forest University, 1972.
16.
Donald W. Taylor, Paul C. Berry, and Clifford H. Block . "Does Group Participation When Using Brainstorming Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking?" Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 3, 1958, pp. 23-47.
17.
Andrew H. Van de Ven and Andre L. Delbecq . "The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi and Interacting Group Decision-Making Processes," Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 17, 1974, pp. 605-621.
18.
—. "Nominal Versus Interacting Group Processes for Committee Decision-Making Effectiveness," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 14, 1971, pp. 203-212.
