This article presents the findings of a large-scale, multifaceted investigation into the use of English as a business lingua franca in Hong Kong’s key service industries. The findings were derived from four sources: semistructured interviews with 28 Chinese professionals; four “week-in-the-life” case studies, which include an all-day office observation; analyses of telephone conference recordings and email chains; and a questionnaire survey involving more than 2,000 respondents. The evidence suggests that English, particularly its written form, plays a crucial role in business communication, although the nature and extent of its use vary according to an array of institutional and individual factors, such as a company’s ownership and a professional’s duties. The qualitative data illustrate the interplay between the two written (English, Chinese) and three spoken codes (English, Cantonese, Putonghua) in workplace communication, and particularly the symbiotic relationship between written English and Cantonese.
AndersonH.RasmussenE. (2004). The role of language skills in corporate communication. Corporate Communications, 9, 231-242.
2.
ArnerD. W.HsuB. F. C. (2008). The rule of law and economic development in the Hong Kong SAR. In ChanM. K. (Ed.), China’s Hong Kong transformed: Retrospect and prospects beyond the first decade (pp. 173-187). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
3.
Bargiela-ChiappiniF. (Ed.). (2009). The handbook of business discourse. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
4.
BautistaM. L. S.BoltonK. (Eds.). (2008) Philippine English: Linguistic and literary perspectives. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
5.
BilbowG. (2002). Commissive speech act use in intercultural business meetings. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 40, 287-304.
6.
CarrollJ. (2005). Edge of empires: Chinese elites and British colonials in Hong Kong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
CharlesM. (2007). Language matters in global communication: Article based on ORA lecture, October2006. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 260-282.
11.
CharlesM.Marschan-PiekkariR. (2002). Language training for enhanced horizontal communication: A challenge for MNCs. Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 9-29.
12.
ChengW.MokE. (2008). Discourse processes and products: Land surveyors in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 57-73.
13.
ChewK. S. (2005). An investigation of the English language skills used by new entrants in banks in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 423-435.
14.
ChiuS.LuiT. L. (2009). Hong Kong: Becoming a Chinese global city. London, England: Routledge.
15.
CrickD. (1999). An investigation into SMEs’ use of languages in their export operations. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 5, 19-31.
16.
DarwinJ. (2009). The empire project: The rise and fall of the British world-system. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DeneireM. (2008). English in the French workplace: Realism and anxieties. World Englishes, 27, 181-195.
18.
DhirK. (2005). The value of language: Concept, perspectives, and policies. Corporate Communications, 10, 358-382.
19.
DingD. D. (2006). An indirect style in business communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20, 87-100.
20.
EhrenreichS. (2010). English as business lingua franca in a German multinational corporation. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 408-431.
21.
ErlingE. J.WaltonA. (2007). English at work in Berlin. English Today, 23, 32-40.
22.
EvansS. (2009). The evolution of the English-language speech community in Hong Kong. English World-Wide, 30, 278-301.
23.
EvansS. (2010). Business as usual: The use of English in the professional world in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 29, 153-167.
24.
EvansS. (2011). Historical and comparative perspectives on the medium of instruction in Hong Kong. Language Policy, 10, 19-36.
25.
EvansS.GreenC. (2003). The use of English by Chinese professionals in post-1997 Hong Kong. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 24, 386-412.
26.
FaureD.LeeP. T. (Eds.). (2004). Economy: A documentary history of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
27.
FlowerdewJ.WanA. (2010). The linguistic and the contextual in applied genre analysis: The case of the company audit report. English for Specific Purposes, 29, 78-93.
28.
FredrikssonR.Barner-RasmussenW.PiekkariR. (2006). The multinational corporation as a multilingual organization: The notion of a common corporate language. Corporate Communications, 11, 406-423.
29.
FriedmanT. L. (2006). The world is flat: The globalized world in the twenty-first century. London, England: Penguin.
30.
GillhamB. (2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
31.
GraddolD. (2010). English next—India. London, England: British Council.
32.
GrinF. (2001). English as economic value: Facts and fallacies. World Englishes, 20, 65-78.
33.
GuffeyM. E.LoewyD. (2011). Business communication: Process and product. Mason, OH: South-Western/Cengage Learning.
34.
HarzingA. W.FeelyA. (2008). The language barrier and its implications for HQ-subsidiary relationships. Cross-Cultural Management, 15, 49-61.
35.
Hong Kong Government. (1991-2005). Survey of regional offices representing overseas companies in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
36.
Hong Kong Government. (2011, February). 2010 economic background and 2011 prospects. Tamar, Hong Kong: Economic Analysis Division, Economic Analysis and Business Facilitation Unit, Financial Secretary’s Office. Retrieved from http://www.hkeconomy.gov.hk/en/pdf/er_10q4.pdf
37.
JanssensM.LambertJ.SteyaertC. (2004). Developing language strategies for international companies: The contribution of translation studies. Journal of World Business, 39, 414-430.
38.
JensenA. (2009). Discourse strategies in professional email negotiation: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 28, 4-18.
39.
KachruB. B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In QuirkR.WiddowsonH. (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11-30). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40.
KankaanrantaA.Louhiala-SalminenL. (2010). “English?–Oh, it’s just work!”: A study of BELF users’ perceptions. English for Specific Purposes, 29, 204-209.
41.
KankaanrantaA.PlankenB. (2010). BELF competence as business knowledge of internationally operating business professionals. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 380-407.
KuH.ZussmanA. (2010). Lingua franca: The role of English in international trade. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75, 250-260.
44.
LehtonenT.KarjalainenS. (2008). University graduates’ workplace language needs as perceived by employers. System, 36, 492-503.
45.
LeppänenS.NikulaT. (2007). Diverse uses of English in Finnish society: Discourse-pragmatic insights into media, educational and business contexts. Multilingua, 26, 333-380.
46.
LiK. W. (2006). The Hong Kong economy: Recovery and restructuring. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.
47.
LiuS. Y. (1997). Hong Kong: A survey of its political and economic development over the past 150 Years. China Quarterly, 151, 583-592.
48.
LockerK. O.Kyo KaczmarekS. (2009). Business communication: Building critical skills. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
49.
Louhiala-SalminenL. (2002). The fly’s perspective: Discourse in the daily routine of a business manager. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 211-231.
50.
Louhiala-SalminenL.CharlesM.KankaanrantaA. (2005). English as a lingua franca in Nordic corporate mergers: Two case companies. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 401-421.
51.
LundeliusJ. O. (1997). Languages and business: The Hong Kong mix. Business Communication Quarterly, 60, 112-125.
52.
LuoY.ShenkarO. (2006). The multinational corporation as a multilingual community: Language and organization in a global context. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 321-339.
53.
LysandrouP.LysandrouY. (2003). Global English and proregression: Understanding English language spread in the contemporary era. Economy and Society, 32, 207-233.
54.
MacleanD. (2006). Beyond English: Transnational corporations and the strategic management of language in a complex multilingual business environment. Management Decision, 44, 1377-1390.
55.
MarschanR.WelchD.WelchL. (1997). Language: The forgotten factor in multinational management. European Management Journal, 15, 591-598.
56.
Marschan-PiekkariR.WelchD.WelchL. (1999). In the shadow: The impact of language on structure, power and communication in the multinational. International Business Review, 8, 421-440.
57.
McCrumR. (2010). Globish: How English became the world’s language. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
58.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
59.
MeyerD. R. (2000). Hong Kong as a global metropolis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Montgomery MartinR. (1996). Report on the Island of Hong Kong. In JarmanR. L. (Ed.), Hong Kong annual administration reports 1841-1941 (pp. 5-17). London, England: Cambridge Archive Editions. (Original work published 1844)
61.
NickersonC. (1998). Corporate culture and the use of written English within British subsidiaries in The Netherlands. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 281-294.
62.
NickersonC. (2005). English as a lingua franca in international business contexts. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 367-380.
63.
OstlerN. (2010). The last lingua franca: English until the return of Babel. London, England: Allen Lane.
64.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
PoonA. Y. K. (2010). Language use, and language policy and planning in Hong Kong. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11, 1-66.
66.
QinX. (2007). A decade of change in the business environment. In YeungY. M. (Ed.), The first decade: The Hong Kong SAR in retrospective and introspective perspectives (pp. 189-214). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
67.
Rogerson-RevellP. (2007). Using English for international business: A European case study. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 103-120.
68.
Rogerson-RevellP. (2008). Participation and performance in international business meetings. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 338-360.
69.
SungY. W. (2008). The Hong Kong economy since reversion. In ChanM. K. (Ed.), China’s Hong Kong transformed: Retrospect and prospects beyond the first decade (pp. 191-211). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.
70.
TsangS. (2004). A modern history of Hong Kong. London, England: I. B. Tauris.
VaaraE.TienariJ.PiekkariR.SänttiR. (2005). Language and the circuits of power in a merging multinational corporation. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 595-623.
73.
VandermeerenS. (1999). English as a lingua franca in written corporate communication: Findings from a European survey. In Bargiela-ChiappiniF.NickersonC. (Eds.), Writing business: Genres, media and discourses (pp. 273-291). London, England: Longman.
74.
Virkkula-RäisänenT. (2010). Linguistic repertoires and semiotic resources in interaction: A Finnish manager as a mediator in a multilingual meeting. Journal of Business Communication, 47, 505-531.
75.
WelchD.WelchL.PiekkariR. (2005). Speaking in tongues: The importance of language in international management processes. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35, 10-27.
