This study extends previous research by examining the relationship between communication apprehension (CA) and learning preferences in an organizational setting. Findings suggest a correlation between employees’ high CA and a preference for the reflective observation learning mode as well as the diverging and assimilating learning styles. Conversely, results revealed a correlation between employees’ low CA and a preference for the concrete experience and active experimentation learning modes as well as the accommodating learning style. The author discusses the theoretical and practical significance of these results as well as proposes future research directions.
AllenJ. L.LongK. M.O’MaraJ.JuddB. B. (2007). The effects of students’ predispositions toward communication, learning styles, and sex on academic achievement. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 4, 71-84.
2.
AlredG. J. (2006). Bridging cultures: The academy and the workplace. Journal of Business Communication, 43, 79-88.
3.
AndersenJ.Bell-DaquilanteC. (1980, April). The influence of communication behaviors and predisposition on individual learning style preference. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Boston, MA.
4.
ArmstrongS. J.AnisM. (2008). Experiential learning and the acquisition of managerial tacit knowledge. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 189-208.
5.
AyresJ.KeereetaweepT.ChenP. E.EdwardsP. A. (1998). Communication apprehension and employment interviews. Communication Education, 47, 1-17.
6.
BakerA. C.KolbD. A. (1993). Diversity, learning, and good conversation. In SimsR. R. (Ed.), Diversity and differences in organizations: Issues and perspectives (pp. 17-32). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
7.
BarkerR. T.CamarataM. R. (1998). The role of communication in creating and maintaining a learning organization: Preconditions, indicators, and disciplines. Journal of Business Communication, 35, 443-467.
8.
BartooH.SiasP. M. (2004). When enough is too much: Communication apprehension and employee information experiences. Communication Quarterly, 52, 15-26.
9.
BeattyM. J.McCroskeyJ. C. (2001). The biology of communication: A communibiological perspective. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
10.
BourhisJ.BerquistC. (1990). Communication apprehension in the basic course: Learning styles and preferred instructional strategies of high and low apprehensive students. In HugenbergL. (Ed.), Basic communication course annual (Vol. 2, pp. 27-46). Boston, MA: American Press.
11.
BourhisJ.StubbsJ. (1991, April). Communication apprehension, learning styles, and academic achievement. Paper presented at the Central States Speech Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
12.
BrunerJ. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
ButlerJ. (1986). Personality characteristics in subjects high and low in communication apprehension about communication. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 62, 895-898.
14.
ComadenaM. E. (1984). Brainstorming groups. Small Group Research, 15, 251-264.
15.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Touchstone.
16.
DobosJ. A. (1996). Collaborative learning: Effects of student expectations. Communication Education, 45, 118-134.
17.
DwyerK. K. (1998). Communication apprehension and learning style preference: Correlations and implications for teaching. Communication Education, 47, 137-150.
18.
DwyerK. K.CruzA. M. (1998). Communication apprehension, personality, and grades in the basic course: Are there correlations?Communication Research Reports, 15, 436-444.
19.
FurnhamA. (1992). Personality and learning style: A study of three instruments. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 429-438.
20.
FurnhamA.JacksonC. J.MillerT. (1999). Personality, learning style and work performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1113-1122.
21.
HarvilleD. L. (1992). Person/job fit model of communication apprehension in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 55-61.
22.
JablinF. M.SeiboldD. R.SorensenR. L. (1977). Potential inhibitory effects of group participation on brainstorming preferences. Central States Speech Journal, 28, 113-121.
23.
JablinF. M.SussmanL. (1978). An exploration of communication and productivity in real brainstorming groups. Human Communication Research, 4, 329-337.
24.
JohnsonD. I. (2003). The relationship between student learning mode and changes in thoughts about communication in the basic oral communication course. Communication Research Reports, 20, 251-259.
25.
JungC. G. (1971). Psychological types. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
KayesD. C. (2002). Experiential learning and its critics: Preserving the role of experience in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 137-149.
27.
KayesD. C. (2005). Internal validity and reliability of Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory Version 3 (1999). Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 249.
28.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. A. (2005a). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory–Version 3.1: Technical specifications. Boston, MA: Hay Group Transforming Learning.
29.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. A. (2005b). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193-212.
30.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. A. (2006). Learning styles and learning spaces: A review of multidisciplinary application of experiential learning theory in higher education. In SimsR. R.SimsS. J. (Eds.), Learning styles and learning: A key to meeting the accountability demands in education (pp. 45-91). Hauppauge, NY: Nova.
31.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32.
KolbD. A. (2005). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory–Version 3.1: Self scoring and interpretation booklet. Boston, MA: Hay Resources Direct.
33.
LasterN.RussT. L. (2010). Looking across the divide: Analyzing cross-disciplinary approaches for teaching business communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 73, 248-264.
34.
LeithG. (1972). The relationships between intelligence, personality and creativity under two conditions of stress. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 42, 240-247.
35.
LewinK. (1997). Resolving social conflict and field theory in social science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36.
LewisL. K. (2000). Communicating change: Four cases of quality programs. Journal of Business Communication, 37, 128-155.
37.
LewisL. K.SchmisseurA. M.StephensK. K.WeirK. E. (2006). Advice on communicating during organizational change: The content of popular press books. Journal of Business Communication, 43, 113-137.
38.
LooR. (2002a). The distribution of learning styles and types for hard and soft business majors. Educational Psychology, 22, 349-360.
39.
LooR. (2002b). A meta-analytic examination of Kolb’s learning style preferences among business majors. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 252-256.
40.
McCarthyB. (1994). The 4MAT research guide. Barrington, IL: Excel.
41.
McCroskeyJ. C. (1977). Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent history theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4, 78-96.
42.
McCroskeyJ. C. (2009). Self-report measurement. In AyresJ.HopfT.McCroskeyJ. C.DalyJ. A.SonandreD. M.WongprasertT. K. (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (3rd ed., pp. 171-192). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
43.
McCroskeyJ. C.BeattyM. J.KearneyP.PlaxT. G. (1985). The content validity of the PRCA-24 as a measure of communication apprehension across communication contexts. Communication Quarterly, 33, 165-173.
44.
McCroskeyJ. C.DalyJ. A.SorensenG. (1976). Personality correlates of communication apprehension: A research note. Human Communication Research, 2, 376-380.
45.
McCroskeyJ. C.RichmondV. P.McCroskeyL. L. (2009). Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, self-perceived communication competence, and compulsive communication: Conceptualizations and perspectives. In AyresJ.HopfT.McCroskeyJ. C.DalyJ. A.SonandreD. M.WongprasertT. K. (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (3rd ed., pp. 97-129). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
46.
McKinneyB. C. (1982). The effects of reticence on group interaction. Communication Quarterly, 30, 124-128.
47.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
48.
OptS. K.LoffredoD. A. (2000). Rethinking communication apprehension: A Myers-Briggs perspective. Journal of Psychology, 134, 556-570.
49.
PiagetJ. (1971). Psychology and epistemology. Middlesex, England: Penguin.
50.
ReichmannS.GrashaA. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scale instrument. Journal of Psychology, 87, 213-223.
51.
ReinschN. L.Jr.LewisP. V. (1984). Communication apprehension as a determinant of channel preferences. Journal of Business Communication, 21, 53-61.
52.
RichmondV. P.McCroskeyJ. C. (1998). Communication: Apprehension, avoidance, and effectiveness (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
53.
RichmondV. P.McCroskeyJ. C.DavisL. M. (1982). Individual differences among employees, management communication style, and employee satisfaction: Replication and extension. Human Communication Research, 8, 170-188.
54.
RichmondV. P.RoachD. K. (1992). Willingness to communicate and employee success in U.S. organizations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 95-115.
55.
RussT. L. (2009). The status of the business communication course at U.S. colleges and universities. Business Communication Quarterly, 72, 395-413.
56.
RussT. L. (2010). Programmatic and participatory: Introducing two frameworks for classifying experiential change implementation methods. Simulation & Gaming, 41, 767-786.
57.
SmithC. D.SawyerC. R.BehnkeR. R. (2005). Physical symptoms of discomfort associated with worry about giving a public speech. Communication Reports, 18, 31-41.
58.
SoodJ. H.AdamsP. (1984). Model of management learning styles as a predictor of export behavior and performance. Journal of Business Research, 12, 169-182.
59.
ThomasG. F. (2007). How can we make our research more relevant?Journal of Business Communication, 44, 283-296.
60.
ThomasG. F.TymonW. G.Jr.ThomasK. W. (1994). Communication apprehension, interpretive styles, preparation and performance in oral briefing. Journal of Business Communication, 31, 311-326.
61.
WinieckiK. L.AyresJ. (1999). Communication apprehension and receiver apprehension in the workplace. Communication Quarterly, 47, 431-440.
62.
WyrickD. A. (2003). Understanding learning styles to be a more effective team leader and engineering manager. Engineering Management Journal, 15, 27-31.
63.
YamazakiY. (2005). Learning styles and typologies of cultural differences: A theoretical and empirical comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 521-548.
