Much of the theory guiding career development research is grounded in studies of men's careers in professional positions. In addition to largely ignoring the career experiences of women, the career literature pays little attention to overcoming barriers to career advancement in organizations—a challenge many women and men both face over the course of their career development. Using survey data, analyses of in-depth interviews, and a focus group discussion with female executives in the high-tech industry, this study finds variations of three responses: exit, voice, and rationalizing to remain are used by women in response to career barriers. These responses form the foundation of a career barrier sensemaking and response framework presented in the study. Findings indicate that perceived organizational sanctioning of career barriers and the organization's commitment to the career advancement of other women also influence participants' responses to barriers and their strategies for sensemaking, respectively.
Astin, H.S. (1984). The meaning of work in women's lives: A sociopsychological model of career choice and work behaviour. Counseling Psychologist , 12, 117-126.
Bergsten, G.S., & Bova, R. (1990). Worker power under communism: The interplay of exit and voice. Comparative Economic Studies, 32(1), 42-72.
4.
Brooks, L. (1984). Counseling special groups: Women and ethnic minorities . In D. Brown, L. Brooks, & associates (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 355-368). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Buzzanell, P.M. (2000). The promise and practice of the new career and social contract: Illusions exposed and suggestions for reform. In P. M. Buzzanell (Ed.), Rethinking organizational and managerial communication from feminist perspectives (pp. 209-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Cannings, K. (1989). An exit-voice model of managerial attachment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12, 107-129.
7.
Ellis, J.B. (2007). Psychological contracts: Does work status affect perceptions of making and keeping promises? Management Communication Quarterly, 20(4), 335-362.
8.
Fairris, D. (1995). From exit to voice in shopfloor governance: The case of company unions. Business History Review, 69(4), 494-529.
9.
Farrell, D., & Rusbult, C. (1985). Understanding the retention function: A model of the causes of exit, voice, loyalty and neglect behaviors. Personnel Administrator, 30(4), 129-140.
10.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
11.
Gurdon, M.A., Savitt, R., & Pribova, M. (1999). Consumer activism in the Czech Republic: The role of exit and voice in a changing economy. Journal of Socio-Economics , 28(1), 3-19.
12.
Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Isabella, L.A. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How many managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 7-41.
14.
Jablin, F.M., & Kramar, M.W. (1998). Communication-related sense-making and adjustment during job transfers. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 155-182.
15.
Jick, T.D. (1983). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative methodology (pp. 135-148). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Kassing, J.W. (1998). Development and validation of the organizational dissent scale. Management Communication Quarterly, 12(2), 183-229.
17.
Keeley, M., & Graham, J.W. (1991). Exit, voice and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(5), 349-355.
18.
Levinson, H., Price, C., Munden, K., Mandl, H., & Solley, C. (1962). Men, management, and mental health. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Lindlof, T.R., & Taylor, B.C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Lipman-Blumen, J., Fryling, T., Henderson, M.C., Webster Moore, C., & Vecchiotti, R. (1996). Women in corporate leadership: Reviewing a decade's research. Claremont, CA: The Claremont Graduate School Institute for Advanced Studies in Leadership .
21.
Louis, M. (1980). Surprise and sensemaking: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
22.
Lucero, M.A., & Allen, R.A. (1994). Employee benefits: A growing source of psychological contract violations. Human Resource Management, 33, 425-446.
23.
Matland, R.E. (1995). Exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect in an urban school system. Social Science Quarterly, 16(3), 506-512.
24.
Mayes, B.T., & Ganster, D.C. (1988). Exit and voice: A test of hypotheses based on fight/flight responses to job stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(3), 199-216.
25.
Montapert, A. A. (Ed.). (1964). Distilled wisdom. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
Morrison, A.M. (1992). The new leaders: Guidelines on leadership diversity in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
27.
Morrison, A.M., & Von Glinow, M.A. (1990). Women and minorities in management. American Psychologist, 2(2), 200-208.
28.
Morrison, A.M., White, R.P., Van Velsor, E., & the Center for Creative Leadership. (1987). Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America's largest corporations?Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29.
Morrison, E.W., & Robinson, S.L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 222-256.
30.
Ogawa, R.T., & Dutton, J.S. (1997). Parent involvement and school choice: Exit and voice in public schools. Urban Education, 32(3), 333-353.
31.
Perun, P.J., & Beilby, D.D.V. (1981). Towards a model of female occupational behavior: A human development approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 6, 234-252.
32.
Pestoff, V.A. (1988). Exit voice and collection action in Swedish Consumer Policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 11(1), 1-27.
33.
Robinson, S.L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract . Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574-599.
34.
Robinson, S.L., & Rousseau, D.M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245-259.
35.
Rousseau, D.M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389-400.
36.
Rousseau, D.M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Rusbult, C.E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A.G., III. (1988). Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.
Starbuck, W.H., & Milliken, F.J. (1988). Executives' perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In D. C. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp. 35-66). Greenwich, CT : JAI.
40.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Thomas, J.B., Clark, S.M., & Gioia, D.A. (1993). Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 239-270.
42.
Turnley, W.H., & Feldman, D.C. (1999). The impact of psychological contract violations on exit, voice, loyalty and neglect. Human Relations, 52(7), 895-922.
43.
Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Weick, K.E., & Daft, R.L. (1983). The effectiveness of interpretation systems. In K. S. Cameron and D. A. Whetten (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models (pp. 71-93). New York: Academic Press.
45.
Whyte, B., Cox, C., & Cooper, C. (1992). Women's career development: A study of high flyers . Oxford: Blackwell.
