Studies of corporate reporting that focus on information disclosure do so primarily from a mandatory, financial perspective owing the decision to the rationality of corporate actors. Yet, social and environmental disclosures—often reported voluntarily—are increasing in importance because of their impact on a firm's performance and perceived value. Likewise, disclosure decisions are made based on managerial choice, often being communicated for a specific strategic purpose. The aim of this article is to illuminate the importance of voluntary disclosures as an aspect of corporate reporting and to integrate the deterministic and behavioral elements of disclosure decisions. A taxonomy of the disclosure process, activities, tasks, forms, types, and strategies is provided to add to our understanding of the additive and corrective nature of proactively disclosing information either to provide context to existing disclosures or to use information in a preventive manner.
AES Corporation. (2007, January 16). GE, AES plan partnership to lead US market in offsetting greenhouse gas emissions . Retrieved from http://newsroom.aes.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=202639&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=950477&highlight
2.
Aguilera, R., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review , 28(3), 447-465.
3.
Aguilera, R.V., Williams, C.A., Conley, J.M., & Rupp, D. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147-158.
4.
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1999). SEC issues SAB 99 on materiality. New York: Author.
5.
Anonymous. (2002). Should the SEC expand nonfinancial disclosure requirements?Harvard Law Review, 115, 1433-1455.
6.
Ashforth, B.E., & Gibbs, B.W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation . Organization Science, 1, 177-194.
7.
Bartlett, S., & Jones, M.J. (1997). Annual reporting disclosures 1970-90: An exemplification . Accounting, Business and Financial History, 7(1), 61-80.
8.
Besanko, D., Dranove, D., & Shanley, M. (2000). The economics of strategy (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
9.
Botosan, C.A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital . The Accounting Review, 72(3), 323-350.
10.
Carroll, A.B. (1981). Business and society. Managing corporate social performance. Boston: Little Brown .
11.
Cheney, G., & Christensen, L.T. (2001). Organizational identity: Linkages between internal and external communication. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research and methods (pp. 231-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 2-22.
13.
Child, J. (1997). Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: Retrospect and prospect. Organization Studies, 18(1), 43-76.
14.
Clark, C.E. (2000). Differences between public relations and corporate social responsibility: An analysis. Public Relations Review , 26(3), 363-380.
15.
ComplianceWeek. (2004, November 2). New regulations, standards influencing environmental disclosures, p. 4.
16.
ComplianceWeek. (2005, April 12). Global warming gets hot; Ford to issue climate report, p. 2.
17.
Core, J.E. (2001). A review of the empirical disclosure literature . Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 442-456.
18.
Cormier, D., Gordon, I.M., & Magnan, M. (2004). Corporate environmental disclosure: Contrasting management's perceptions with reality. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(2), 143-165.
Dawkins, C.E. (2005). First to market: Issues management pacesetters and the pharmaceutical industry response to AIDS in Africa. Business & Society, 44(3), 244-282.
21.
Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 282-311.
22.
deRond, M., & Thietart, R.-A. (2007). Choice, chance and inevitability in strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(5), 535-551.
23.
DiMaggio, P.J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3-21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
24.
DiPiazza, S.A., & Eccles, R.G. (2002). Building public trust: The future of corporate reporting. New York: John Wiley .
25.
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122-136.
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century business. Stony Creek, CT: New Society.
28.
Elsbach, K.D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57-88.
29.
Elsbach, K.D., & Sutton, R.I. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699-738.
30.
Encyclopædia Britannica Online. (2007). Additive. Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9003702 .
31.
Engardio, P. (2007, January 29). Beyond the green corporation. Business Week, No. 4019, 50-64.
Gibbins, M., Richardson, A., & Waterhouse, J. (1990). The management of corporate financial disclosure: Opportunism, ritualism, policies and processes. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1), 121-143.
34.
Gillan, S.L., & Starks, L.T. (2003). Corporate governance, corporate ownership, and the role of institutional investors: A global perspective. Journal of Applied Finance, 13(2), 4-23.
35.
Goll, I., & Zeitz, G. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring corporate ideology . Organization Studies, 12, 191-207.
36.
Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D.M., & Sinclair, C.D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(3), 327-356.
37.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8, 47-77.
38.
Guthrie, J., & Parker, L.D. (1990). Corporate disclosure practices: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting , 3, 159-175.
39.
Hambrick, D.C. (2007). Upper-echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343.
40.
Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
41.
Healy, P.M., & Palepu, K.G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 31, 405-440.
Ho, S.S., & Wong, K.S. (2003). Preparers' perceptions of corporate reporting and disclosures. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance , 1(1), 71-81.
44.
Holder-Webb, L., & Cohen, J.R. (2007). The association between disclosure, distress and failure. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 301-314.
45.
Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management-New perspectives why companies engage in social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(1/2), 55-68.
46.
Karr, S.S. (2004, August 17). Over-disclosure: Companies look to differentiate themselves. Compliance Week, p. 2.
47.
Kohut, G.F., & Segars, A.H. (1992). The president's letter to stockholders: An examination of corporate communication strategy. The Journal of Business Communication, 29(1), 7-21.
48.
Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1993). Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 246-271.
49.
LaPorta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52, 1130-1150.
50.
Lee, S.Y., & Rhee, S.K. (2006). The change in corporate environmental strategies: A longitudinal empirical study. Management Decision, 45(2), 196-216.
51.
Lev, B. (1992). Information disclosure strategy. California Management Review, 34(4), 9-32.
52.
Lindblom, C.K. (1994). The implications of organisational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York.
53.
Livesey, S. (1999). McDonald's and the Environmental Defense Fund: A case study of a green alliance. The Journal of Business Communication, 36(1), 5-39.
54.
Livesey, S. (2001). Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria. The Journal of Business Communication , 38(1), 58-91.
55.
Livesey, S., & Kearins, K. (2002). Transparent and caring corporations? Organization & Environment, 15(3), 233-258.
56.
Lowry, P.B., Curtis, A., & Lowry, M.R. (2004). Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. The Journal of Business Communication, 41(1), 66-99.
57.
Lubatkin, M., Lane, P.J., Collins, S., & Very, P. (2007). An embeddedness framing of governance and opportunism: Towards a cross-nationally accommodating theory of agency. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 28, 43-58.
58.
Magness, V. (2006). Strategic posture, financial performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(4), 540-563.
59.
Manning, P. (1986). The social reality and social organization of natural decision-making. Washington & Lee Law Review, 43(4), 1291-1311.
60.
Marcoux, A.M. (2003). A fiduciary argument against stakeholder theory . Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 1-24.
61.
Mattel Inc. (2007, September 21). Toys set off recall debate; U.S. investigates if Mattel provided timely disclosures . Retrieved from http://www.shareholder.com/mattel/downloads/09-21-07%20China%20Meeting%20Media%20Statement.pdf
62.
McKelvey, B. (1982). Organizational systematics: Taxonomy, evolution, and classification. Berkeley: University of California Press.
63.
McNamee, M. (2001, November 5). New yardsticks for investors. Business Week, No. 3756, 92.
64.
Meek, G.K., Roberts, C.B., & Gray, S.J. (1995). Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by U.S., U.K. and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 555-572.
65.
Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process . Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
66.
Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formulation. Management Science, 24, 934-948.
67.
Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J.A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257-272.
68.
Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., & Gray, R. (2006). Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal , 19(2), 228-255.
69.
National Investor Relations Institute. (2004 ). Standards of practice for investor relations (pp. 1-58). Vienna, VA: Author.
70.
Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265-282.
71.
Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of "triple bottom line." Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243-262.
72.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes . Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
73.
Oliver, C. (1997). Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 697-713.
74.
Orsato, R.J. (2006). Competitive environmental strategy: When does it pay to be green? California Management Review, 48(2), 127-143.
75.
Patten, D. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471-475.
76.
Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York : Free Press.
77.
Porter, M.E. (1996). What is strategy?Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.
78.
Richardson, A.J., & Welker, M. (2001). Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society , 26(7), 597-616.
79.
Roberts, R.W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(6), 595-612.
80.
Robins, F. (2006). Corporate governance after Sarbanes-Oxley: An Australian perspective. Corporate Governance, 6(1), 34-48.
81.
Saloner, G., Shepard, A., & Podolny, J. (2001). Strategic management. New York : John Wiley.
82.
Securities and Exchange Commission. (2004). Additional Form 8-K Disclosure Requirements and Acceleration of Filing Date, 69 (S7-22-02), 48370. Washington, DC: Federal Register.
83.
Sheehan, B. (2005). Europe switches to US-style disclosure rules. Global Finance, 19(3), 18-19.
84.
Skinner, D.J. (1994). Why firms voluntarily disclose bad news. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(1), 38-60.
85.
Ullmann, A.A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 540-557.
86.
Verrecchia, R.E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 97-180.
87.
Watts, R., & Zimmerman, J. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-134.
88.
Weaver, G.R., Trevino, L.K., & Cochran, P.L. (1999). Corporate ethics programs as control systems: Influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 41-57.
89.
Webster's II dictionary. (1988). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
90.
Williams, C.A. (1999). The Securities and Exchange Commission and corporate social transparency. Harvard Law Review, 112(6), 1197.
91.
Williams, C.C. (2003). Network communication: Creating better understanding and value for intangible assets. Investor Relations Quarterly , 5(4), 11-19.
92.
Williams, C.C. (2004). Trust diffusion: The effect of interpersonal trust on structure, function and organizational transparency. Unpublished dissertation , Boston University.
93.
Williams, C.C. (2005a). Corporate disclosure strategies: An analysis of investor approach and institutional effects. In K. M. Weaver (Ed.), Proceedings of the Academy of Management (p. 71). Briar Cliff, NY: Academy of Management.
94.
Williams, C.C. (2005b). Trust diffusion: The effect of interpersonal trust on structure, function and organizational transparency. Business & Society, 44(3), 357-368.
95.
Wood, D.J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.
96.
Woodward, D.G., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (1996). Organizational legitimacy and stakeholder information provision. British Journal of Management, 7, 329-347.
