Blackburn-Brockman, E., & Belanger, K. (2001). One page or two? A national study of CPA recruiters’ preferences for resume length. Journal of Business Communication, 38, 29-57.
2.
Carter, T. J. (2002). The importance of talk to midcareer women’s development: A collaborative inquiry. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 55-91.
3.
Charney, D. (1996). Empiricism is not a four-letter word. College Composition and Communication, 47(4), 567-593.
4.
Cochran, D. S., & Dolan, J. A. (1984). Qualitative research: An alternative to quantitative research in communication. Journal of Business Communication, 21, 25-32.
5.
Dulek, R. E. (1993). Models of development: Business schools and business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 315-331.
6.
Dulek, R. E., & Fielden, J. S. (1990). Principles of business communication. New York: Macmillan.
7.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Ltd.
8.
Graham, M. B. (1999). The business of everyday living: Letters from a nineteenth-century landlady. In J. M. Perkins & N. Blyler (Eds.), Narrative and professional communication (pp. 181-193). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
9.
Graham, M. B., & David, C. (1994). The rhetoric of power: Political issues in management writing. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3(2), 165-178.
10.
Graham, M. B., & Lindeman, N. (2005). The rhetoric and politics of science in the case of the Missouri River System. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19, 422-448.
11.
Harcourt, J., & Krizan, A. C. (1989). A comparison of resume content preferences of Fortune 500 personnel administrators and business communication instructors. Journal of Business Communication, 26, 177-190.
12.
Jameson, D. (2000). Telling the investment story: A narrative analysis of shareholder reports. Journal of Business Communication, 37, 7-38.
13.
Krider, D. S., & Ross, P. G. (1997). The experiences of women in a public relations firm: A phenomenological explication. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 437-454.
14.
Limaye, M. R. (1993). A letter to the editor: Relevance versus significance in business communication research. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 463-471.
15.
Livesey, S. (2001). Eco-identity as discursive struggle: Royal Dutch/Shell, Brent Spar, and Nigeria. Journal of Business Communication, 38, 58-91.
16.
Locker, K. O. (1985). “Sir, this will never do”: Model dunning letters, 1592-1873. Journal of Business Communication, 22, 39-45.
17.
Locker, K. O. (1994). The challenge of interdisciplinary research. Journal of Business Communication, 31, 137-151.
18.
Prasad, A., & Mir, R. (2002). Digging deep for meaning: A critical hermeneutic analysis of CEO letters to shareholders in the oil industry. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 92-116.
19.
Reinsch, N. L. (1996). Business communication: Present, past, and future. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(1), 27-49.
20.
Reinsch, N. L. (1997). Relationships between telecommuting workers and their managers: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 343-437.
21.
Rogers, P. (1989). Choice-based writing in managerial context: The case of the dealer contract report. Journal of Business Communication, 26, 197-216.
22.
Rogers, P. (1993). What is a researcher?Journal of Business Communication, 30, 204-206.
23.
Rogers, P. (2001). Convergence and commonality challenge business communication research. Journal of Business Communication, 38, 14-23.
24.
Ryan, C. (2001). The challenge of inclusion: Reconsidering alternative approaches to teaching and research. Journal of Business Communication, 38, 256-260.
25.
Shaw, G. (1993). The shape of our field: Business communication as a hybrid discipline. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 297-313.
26.
Smeltzer, L. R. (1996). Communication within the manager’s context. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(1), 5-26.
27.
Suchan, J. (1993). Why do we do irrelevant research?Journal of Business Communication, 30, 202-203.
28.
Suchan, J. (1998). The effect of high-impact writing on decision making within a public sector bureaucracy. Journal of Business Communication, 35, 299-327.
29.
Thralls, C. (1992). Bakhtin, collaborative partners, and published discourse: A collaborative view of composing. In Janis Forman (Ed.), New visions of collaborative writing (pp. 63-92). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
30.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Tucker, M. L., Powell, K. S., & Meyer, D. (1995). Qualitative research in business communication: A review and analysis. Journal of Business Communication, 32, 383-399.
32.
Yates, J. (1985). Graphs as a managerial tool: A case study of Du Pont’s use of graphs in the early twentieth century. Journal of Business Communication, 22, 5-33.
33.
Yates, J. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34.
Yates, J. (1993). The opportunity of qualitative research. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 199-200.
35.
Yates, J., & Orilikowki, W. (2002). Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 13-35.
36.
Zhao, J. J. (2000). The Chinese approach to international business. Journal of Business Communication, 37, 209-237.