This research provides strong support for the existence of dominant media norms within organizations and describes their influence on employees’ (a) perceptions of organizational norms, (b) reported media use, and (c) performance evaluations. Survey results demonstrate the presence of strong organizational norms for instant messaging (IM) and e-mail use within a large, high-tech organization. These norms, as well as supervisory behavior, may influence employees’ use of IM and e-mail and even more so when employees have strong polychronic orientations. In addition, employees who reportedly followed organizational norms by using IM and e-mail were awarded higher performance ratings by their supervisors, with 30% of the variance explained. The authors support the survey findings with in-depth interviews with participants exploring media use.
Andrews, P. H., & Herschel, R. T. (1996). Organizational communication: Empowerment in a technological society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Bernardin, H., Hennessey, H., & Peyrefitte, J. (1995). Age, racial, and gender bias as a function of criterion specificity: A test of expert testimony. Human Resource Management Review, 5(1), 63-77.
4.
Bluedorn, A. C. (2002). The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Bluedorn, A. C., Kallaith, T. J., Strube, M. J., & Martin, G. D. (1999). Polychronicity and the inventory of polychronic values (IVP): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3/4), 205-230.
6.
Bluedorn, A. C., Kaufman, C. F., & Lane, P. M. (1992). How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time. Academy of Management Executive, 6, 17-26.
7.
Bommer, W. H., Johnson, J. L., Rich, G. A., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A metaanalysis. Personnel Psychology, 48, 587-605.
8.
Carlson, J., & Zmud, R. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 153-170.
9.
Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
10.
Daft, R., Lengel, R., & Trevino, L. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 355-367.
11.
Dennis, A., & Kinney, S. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256-274.
12.
Dennis, A., Kinney, S., & Hung, Y. (1999). Gender differences in the effects of media richness. Small Group Research, 30(4), 405-437.
13.
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
14.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
15.
Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47-53.
16.
Ford, J. K., Kraiger, K., & Schechtman, S. L. (1986). Study of race effects in objective indices and subjective evaluations of performance: A meta-analysis of performance criteria. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 330-337.
17.
Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 921-950.
18.
Fulk, J., & Boyd, B. (1991). Emerging theories of communication in organizations. Journal of Management, 17, 407-446.
19.
Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfeld (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 71-94). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Fulk, J., Steinfield, C., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529-552.
21.
Gilsdorf, J. W. (1998). Organizational rules on communicating: How employees are and are not learning the ropes. Journal of Business Communication, 35, 173-201.
22.
Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
23.
Haase, R. F., Dong, Y. L., & Banks, D. (1979). Cognitive correlates of polychronicity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 271-282.
24.
Hall, E. T. (1973). The silent language. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
25.
Hall, E. T. (1983). The dance of life: The other dimension of time. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
26.
Igbaria, M., & Chakrabarti, A. (1990). Computer attitudes and anxiety toward microcomputer use. Behavior and Information Technology, 9, 229-241.
27.
Jablin, F. (2001). Organizational entry, assimilation, and disengagement/exit. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 732-818). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Jablin, F., & Sias, P. (2001). Communication competence. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 819-864). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Kaufman, C. F., Lane, P. M., & Lindquist, J. D. (1991). Time congruity in the organization: A proposed quality of life framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 6, 79-106.
30.
Kraut, R., Rice, R., Cool, C., & Fish, R. (1998). Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organization Science, 9(4), 437-453.
31.
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
32.
Little, R. J. A., & Schenker, N. (1995). Missing data. In G. Arminger, C. C. Logg, & M. E. Sobel, (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 39-75). New York: Plenum.
33.
Markus, L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science, 5, 505-527.
34.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Meyer, J., Paunonen, S. V., Gellatly, L., Goffin, R., & Jackson, D. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It’s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 152-156.
36.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. M. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
38.
Orlikowski, W., Yates, J., Okamura, K., & Fujimoto, M. (1995). Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science, 6(4), 423-443.
39.
Perey, C. (2004). If you can’t beat IM join IM. Network World, 21, 33-35.
40.
Pulakos, E. D., White, L. A., Oppler, S. H., & Borman, W. C. (1989). Examination of race and sex effects of performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 770-778.
41.
Reinsch, L. N., Jr., Steele, C. M., Lewis, P. V., Stano, M., & Beswick, R. (1990). Measuring telephone apprehension. Management Communication Quarterly, 4(2), 198-221.
42.
Reinsch, N. L., Turner, J. W., & Tinsley, C. (2005, November). Polychronic communication in the work-place: The temporal structure of connected time. Paper presented at the National Communication Association conference, Boston.
43.
Rice, R. (1993). Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451-484.
44.
Rice, R., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 219-244.
45.
Rice, R., & Gattiker, U. (2001). New media and organizational structuring. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 544-581). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Robichaud, D., Giroux, H., & Taylor, J. (2004). The metaconversation: The recursive property of language as a key to organizing. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 617-634.
47.
Rogelberg, S., Luong, A., Sederburg, M., & Cristol, D. (2002). Employee attitude surveys: Examining the attitudes of noncompliant employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 284-293.
48.
Russ, G., Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1990). Media selection and managerial characteristics in organizational communications. Management Communication Quarterly, 4(2), 151-175.
49.
Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-252.
50.
Schwab, D. P. (2005). Research methods for organizational studies. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
Sheffield, J. (1995). The effect of communication medium on negotiation performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4(2), 159-179.
52.
Sitkin, S., Sutcliffe, K., & Barrios-Choplin, J. (1992). A dual-capacity model of communication media choice in organizations. Human Communication Research, 18(4), 563-598.
53.
Sosik, J., & Jung, D. (2003). Impression management strategies and performance in information technology consulting. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(2), 233-268.
54.
Stevens, P. M., Williams, K. P., & Smith, M. (2000). Organizational communication and information processes in an Internet-enabled environment. Psychology and Marketing, 17(7), 607-630.
55.
Suh, K. (1999). Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: An examination of media richness theory. Information and Management, 35(5), 295-312.
56.
Trevino, L., Lengel, R., Bodensteiner, W., Gerloff, E., & Muir, N. K. (1990). The richness imperative and cognitive style: The role of individual differences in media choice behavior. Management Communication Quarterly, 4(2), 176-197.
57.
Trevino, L., Lengel, R., & Daft, R. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations. Communication Research, 14, 553-574.
58.
Turner, J. W., & Tinsley, C. (2002, August). Polychronic communication: Managing multiple conversations at once. Paper presented at the Academy of Management conference, Denver, CO.
59.
Walther, J. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
60.
Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity and analysis of theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 540-555.
61.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: An approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-326.
62.
Yates, J., Orlikowski, W., & Okamura, K. (1999). Explicit and implicit structuring of genres in electronic communication: Reinforcement and change of social interaction. Organization Science, 10(1), 83-103.
63.
Zack, M., & McKenney, J. (1995). Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups. Organization Science, 6(4), 394-422.
