Despite the high reliability of current aeronautical technology and safety improvements, human error continues to be a factor in 60% to 80% of all aviation mishaps. Training is often focused on analysis of faulty procedures or lack of procedures over a more systemic approach. This research explores the existence of the psychological construct of shared mindfulness and examines how it is communicatively constructed and enacted in a high-reliability environment. The qualitative study examines shared mindfulness in 10 aviation student dyads in a decision-making crisis situation to identify the communication behaviors of the construct and to determine whether shared mindfulness may lead to more effective pilot decisions. Findings reveal both the existence of shared mindfulness as a communicative construct and seven inductively derived communication process categories that create shared mindfulness in a dyadic situation. Those dyads demonstrating more communication behaviors of shared mindfulness also made the most effective decisions.
Beaty, D. (1995). The naked pilot. Shrewsbury, UK: Airlife Publishing.
2.
Bevelas J. B., & Coates, L. (1992). How do we account for the mindfulness of face-to-face dialogue?Communication Monographs, 29, 301-305.
3.
Brockmann, E. N., & Anthony, W. P. (1998). The influence of tacit knowledge and collective mind on strategic planning. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(2), 204-219.
4.
Burgoon, J. K., Berger, C. R., & Waldron, V. R. (2000). Mindfulness and interpersonal communication. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 105-127.
5.
Burgoon, J. K., & Langer, E. (1993). Language, fallacies, and mindlessness-mindfulness in social interaction. Communication Yearbook, 18, 105-234.
6.
Casey, M. K., Miller, V. D., & Johnson, J. R. (1997). Information seeking following a reduction in workforce. Communication Research, 24(6), 755-781.
7.
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbookof qualitative research(2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Chute, R. D., & Weiner, E. L. (1996). Cockpit—Cabin communication: II. Shall we tell the pilots?International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6(3), 211-231.
9.
Cushing, S. (1994). Fatal words: Communication clashes and aircraft crashes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Durso, F. T., Truitt, T. R., Hackworth, C. A., Crutchfield, J. M., & Manning, C. A. (1998). En route operational errors and situation awareness. International Journal ofAviation Psychology, 8(2), 177-194.
11.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
Helmreich, R., Merritt, A. C., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1999). The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(1), 19-32.
13.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
14.
Janis, I. L. (1983). Groupthink(2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
15.
Johnson, S. D., & Chung, S. (1999). The effect of thinking aloud pair problem solving (TAPPS) on the troubleshooting ability of aviation technician students. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 37(1), 7-25.
16.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 22(2), 682-724.
17.
King, P. E., & Sawyer, C. R. (1998). Mindfulness, mindlessness and communication instruction. Communication Education, 47(4), 326-336.
18.
Langer, E. J. (1992). Interpersonal mindlessness and language. Communication Monographs, 59, 324-327.
19.
Langer, E. J. (1997). The power of mindful learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
Langer, E. J., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635-642.
21.
Langer, E. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2000). The construct of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 1-10.
22.
Lautman, L., & Gallimore, P. (1987, April/June). Control of the crew caused accident: Results of a 12-operator survey, Airliner, pp. 1-6.
23.
Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sensemaking: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226-251.
24.
Manz, C. C. (1992). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
Miller, V. D. (1996). An experimental study of newcomers’ information seeking behaviors during organizational entry. Communication Studies, 47, 1-24.
26.
Neck, C. P., & Manz, G. G. (1994). From groupthink to teamthink: Toward the creation of constructive thought patterns in self-managing work teams. Human Relations, 47, 929-952.
27.
Palmer, M. T., Lack, A. M., & Lynch, J. C. (1995). Communication conflicts of status and authority in dyadic, task-based interactions: Status generalization in airplane cockpits. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 85-101.
28.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents. New York: Basic Books.
29.
Rufflesmith, H. P. (1979). A simulator study of the interaction of pilot workload with errors, vigilance, and decisions(Technical Memo 7842). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
30.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
31.
Seeger, M. W., Selnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). Communication, organization and crisis. Communication Yearbook, 21, 231-275.
32.
Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. (2001). Exploring the boundaries of crisis communication: The case of the 1997 Red River Valley flood. Communication Studies, 52(2), 153-167.
33.
Shappell, S., & Wiegmann, D. (1996). U.S. naval aviation mishaps, 1977-92: Differences between single-and dual-piloted aircraft. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 67(1), 65-69.
34.
Shappell, S., & Wiegmann, D. (1997). A human error approach to accident investigation. The taxonomy of unsafe operations. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 269-291.
35.
Skitka, L. J., Mosier, K. L., Burdick, M., & Rosenblatt, B. (2000). Automation bias and errors: Are crews better than individuals?International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10(1), 85-97.
36.
Snook, S. A. (2000). Friendly fire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
Timmerman, C. E. (2002). The moderating effect of mindlessness/mindfulness upon media richness and social influence explanations of organizational media. Communication Monographs, 69(2), 111-131.
39.
Trollip, S. R., & Jensen, R. S. (1991). Human factors for general aviation. Englewood, CO.: Jeppesen Sanderson.
40.
Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships. In William J. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships(pp. 253-276). New York: Springer-Verlag.
41.
Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652.
42.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
44.
Weick, K. E., & Meader, D. K. (1993). Sensemaking support systems. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valecich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives(pp. 230-252). New York: Macmillan.
45.
Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.
46.
Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
