Abstract
This study analyzes the discourse during a meeting of three diverse organizations as they attempt to resolve conflicting organizational inter ests. The three diverse groups were a waste disposal business, a grass- roots community organization, and a state regulatory agency. Discourse analysis of a meeting among these three organizations supported nego tiated order theory, which suggests organizations with different cultures find it difficult to achieve a negotiated order because they will at times fail to share the symbolic meaning of the common terms they use. Implications for practice and future research are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
