Race,Gender,and Welfare Reform: The Antinatalist Response

Abramovitz M. (1988). Regulating the lives of women: Social welfare policy from colonial times to the present. Boston; South End.

Acs G. (1993). The impact of AFDC on young women's childbearing decisions (Discussion Paper No. 1011–93). Institute for Research on Poverty.

Albiston C. (1994). The social meaning of the Norplant condition: Constitutional considerations of race, class and gender. Berkeley Women's Law Journal, 9, 9–57.

Amott T. A. (1990). Black women and AFDC: Making entitlement out of necessity. In Gordon L. (Ed.), Women, the state, and welfare (pp. 280–298). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Amott T. A. Matthaei I. (1991). Race, gender and work in the United States. Boston: South End.

Anderson E. (1989). Sex codes and family life among poor inner-city youths. The Annals of the American Academy, 501, 59–78.

Austin R. (1989). Sapphire bound! Wisconsin Law Review, 3, 539–578.

Bardin C. W. (1990). Norplant contraceptive implants. Obstetrics and Gynecology Report, 2(1), 96–102.

Bock G. (1991). Antinatalism, maternity, and paternity in national Socialist racism. In Bock G. Thane P. (Eds.), Maternity and gender policies: Women and the rise of the European welfare states, 1880s-1950s (pp. 233–255). London: Routledge.

Collis P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.

Condon T. (1994, February 22). Lawmaker's Norplant idea deserves a look. The Hartford Courant, p. B1.

Davis A. (1983). Women, race & class. New York: Random House.

Denmark S. (1991, October 19). Birth-control tyranny. The New York Times, p. 23.

Duncan G. J. Hoffman S. D. (1990). Welfare benefits, economic opportunities, and out-of-wedlock births among Black teenage girls. Demography, 27, 519–535.

Fineman M. (1991). Images of mothers in poverty discourses. Duke Law Journal, 274–295.

Fogel C. J. (1991, May 23). Duke bill for welfare moms clears Louisiana house panel. Gannett News Service..

Fortune B. (1992, February 6). Birth control bill spurs fiery debate. Nashville Banner..

Fraser N. Gordon L. (1994). A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 19, 309–336.

Funk A. M. (1993). Norplant use in conjunction with the welfare system. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 2, 147–163.

Gans H. J. (1994). Positive functions of the undeserving poor. Uses of the underclass in America. Politics & Society, 22, 269–283.

Garcia S. A. (1989). My sister's keeper: Negative effects of social welfare and affirmative action programs on Black women. Sex roles, 21(1/2), 25–43.

Gilens M. (n.d.). Racial attitudes and opposition to welfare. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Political Science, Yale University.

Gilens M. (1994, June). Race and poverty in America: Public misperception and the American news media. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Political Science, Yale University.

Gordon L. (1988). What does welfare regulate? Social Research, 55, 609–630.

Gordon L. McLanahan S. (1991). Single parenthood in 1990. Journal of Family History, 16, 97–116.

Handler J. (1994). Two years and you're out. Connecticut Law Review, 26, 859.

Hansen J. (1993, January 26). Miller's welfare plan punishes kids in poverty. Atlanta Journal & Constitution, p. B1.

Harris L. (1993, February 22). After flag fuss, welfare's next Atlanta Journal & Constitution, p. B2.

Hoffman E. P. (1992). Racial differences in the feminization of poverty. The Review of Black Political Economy, 21(2), 19–31.

Hooks B. (1981). Ain't Ia woman: Black women and feminism. Boston: South End.

Hubbard R. (1990). The politics of women's biology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Institute of Government Legislative Service, General Assembly of North Carolina , (1959, March 10). Daily Bulletin No. 25..

Jencks C. Edin K. (1995). Do poor women have a right to bear children? The American Prospect, 20, 43–52.

Kantrowitz B. Wingert P. (1993, February 15). The Norplant debate, Newsweek, 37–42.

Katz M. (1989). The undeserving poor: From the war on poverty to the war on welfare. New York: Pantheon.

Kaus M. (1986, July). The work ethic state. The New Republic, 28.

Klas M. E. (1994, March 3). House panel rejects birth control proposal. Palm Beach Post, p. 4A.

Larson E. J. (1995). Sex, race, and science: Eugenics in the deep south. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lemann N. (1986, June). The origins of the underclass, part 1. The Atlantic Monthly, 31–55.

Levin T. (1991, February 9). A plan to pay welfare mothers for birth control. The New York Times..

Levin-Epstein J. Greenberg M. (1992, November). Rush to reform: 1992 state AFDC legislative and waiver actions. Center for Law and Social Policy, 17–18.

Lewin T. (1994, July 8). “Dream“ contraceptive's nightmare. The New York Times, p. A10.

Lewis O. (1961). The children of Sanchez. New York: Random House,.

Lewis O. (1966). La vida: A Puerto Rican family in the culture of poverty—San Juan & New York. New York: Random House.

Lubiano W. (1992). Black ladies, welfare queens, and state minstrels: Ideological war by narrative means. In Morrison T. (Ed.), Raceing justice, en-gendering power: Essays on Anita Hill, Clarence Thomas, and the construction of social reality. New York: Pantheon.

Mead L. M. (1991). The new politics of the new poverty. The Public Interest, 103, 3–19.

Mertus J. Heller S. (1992). Norplant meets the new eugenicists: The impermissibility of coerced contraception. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 11, 359–383.

Miller D. (1989). Women and social welfare: A feminist analysis. New York: Praeger.

Mink G. (1995). Welfare reform in historical perspective. Social Justice, 21, 114–131.

Moffitt R. (1992). Incentive effects of the U.S. welfare system: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 30.

Morrison J. L. (1965). Illegitimacy, sterilization, and racism: A North Carolina case history. The Social Service Review, 39, 1–10.

Moynihan D. P. (1965). The negro family: The case for national action. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Planning and Research, U.S. Department of Labor.

Moynihan D. P. (1991). Social justice in the next century. America, 165, 132–137.

Murray C. (1994, December). What to do about welfare. Commentary, 26–34.

Myers R. (1991, April 9). Norplant plan rejected. Kansas City Star..

National Organization for Women (NOW) Legal Defense & Education Fund (LDEF). (1991, March). A legal analysis of “caps” on welfare benefits to families with teen mothers, as proposed in Wisconsin's parental & Family Responsibility Initiative (pp. 1–19).

Novak M. (1987). The new consensus on family and welfare. Washington, DC: American Institute for Public Policy Research.

Nsiah-Jefferson L. (1989). Reproductive laws, women of color, and low-income women. In Cohen S. Taub N. (Eds.), Reproductive laws for the 1990s. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.

Patrick K. (1991, March 4). Poor women and society benefit by linking Norplant, welfare aid. Special to the Wichita Eagle..

Paul J. (1968). The return of punitive sterilization proposals; Current attacks on illegitimacy and the AFDC program. Law and Society Review, 77–106.

Placek P. Hendershot G. (1974). Public welfare and family planning: An empirical study of the brood sow myth. Welfare & Family Planning, 21, 658–673.

Rank M. (1989). Fertility among women on welfare; Incidence and determinants. American Sociological Review, 54, 296–304.

Rector R. (1993). Fighting behavioral poverty. Georgetown Journal on Fighting Poverty, 1, 69–73.

Reed A. Jr. (1991). The underclass as myth and symbol: The poverty of discourse about poverty. Radical America, 24(1), 21–40.

Reilly P. R. (1991). The surgical solution: A history of involuntary sterilization in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Robeen G. K. (1992). Laws like white elephants: Sterilization of the right to privacy. SMU Law Review, 46, 57–83.

Roberts D. (1991). Punishing drug addicts who have babies: Women of color, equality, and the right of privacy. Harvard Law Review, 104, 115–137.

Roberts D. (1993). Racism and patriarchy in the meaning of motherhood. Journal of Gender & the Law, 1, 1–38.

Sanger M. (1919, May). Why not birth control? Birth Control Review, pp. 10–11.

Schwartz M. (1994, May 29). Duke presses Louisiana birth control. The Washington Post, p. A14.

Shulman S. (1990). The causes of Black poverty: Evidence and interpretation. Journal of Economic Issues, 24, 1014.

Spaights E. Whitaker A. (1995). Black women in the work force: A new look at an old problem. Journal of Black Studies, 25, 283–296.

Spitz S. S. (1993). Norplant debate: Birth control or woman control? Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 25, 131–169.

Steiner G. (1971). The state of welfare. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Thomas J. (1991). Birth control measure for poor raises a furor: Proposal would pay women on welfare to use contraceptive. The Wichita Eagle..

Thomas S. L. (1994). From the culture of poverty to the culture of single motherhood: The new poverty paradigm. Women & Politics, 14(2), 65–97.

Thomas S. L. (1995). Exchanging welfare checks for wedding rings: Welfare reform in New Jersey & Wisconsin. Affilio: Journal of Women and Social Work, 10, 120–137.

Toner R. (1992, July 5). New politics of welfare focuses on its flaws. The New York Times, pp. A1, A16.

Trombley S. (1988). The right to reproduce: A history of coercive sterilization. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

The 1992 Green Book. Background material and data on programs within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways & Means, WMCP..

Williams C. (1991). Black teenage mothers: Pregnancy and child rearing from their perspective. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

Wilson J. (1995). Welfare reform and character development. City Journal, 5(1), 56–64.

Wood D. (1991, July 16). Wilson stays course in California budget battle. Christian Science Monitor, p. 1.