Across the USA: News from every state. (1992, September 1). USA Today, p. 11A.
2.
Barrett, P.M., & Abramson, J. (1991, October 16). Battle scars confirmation ordeal may affect the views of Justice Thomas. Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
3.
Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).
4.
Carelli, R. (1991, September 17). Three Black law professors oppose Thomas confirmation to Supreme CourtChicago Daily Law Bulletin , p. 3.
5.
Carlson, M.B. (1991, July 15). Marching to a different drummer. Time, pp. 18-21.
6.
Carmody, C. (1991, September 5). Coalition of 40 groups opposes Thomas . Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, p. 1.
7.
Coyle, M., & Strasser, F. (1991, October 28). The jury is out on Thomas: Will his recent ordeal affect his opinions? (Clarence Thomas sexual harassment investigationThe National Law Journal, p. 1.
8.
Dawson v. Delaware, 503 U.S. 159 (1992).
9.
Double standard injustice (1992, September 4). USA Today, p. 10a
10.
Editor's comment (1992). Black Americans: Finally off the liberal plantation. Lincoln Review , 10, 1-10.
11.
Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71 (1992).
12.
Fukurai, H., Butler, E.W., & Krooth, R. (1991). Where did Black jurors go? A theoretical synthesis of racial disenfranchisement in the jury system and jury selection. Journal of Black Studies, 22,196-215.
13.
Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U.S. 42 (1992).
14.
Higginbotham, A.L. (1992). An open letter to Justice Clarence Thomas from a federal judicial colleague. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140, 1005-1028.
15.
Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992).
16.
Ireland, P. (1991, July 29). Clarence Thomas is a threat to American democracy and the Bill of Rights. The National Law Journal , p. 17.
17.
Lewis, N.A. (1992, September 10). Court nominee is confirmed after angry senate debate. New York Times, p. A8.
18.
Margolick, D.C. (1992, September 11). At the bar: When a critical article on Justice Thomas is found too robust for comfort. New York Times, p. B8.
19.
Molzof v. United States 502 U.S. 301 (1992).
20.
Neisser, E. (1992, March 30). Kind and usual punishment revisited: Thomas' views are frightening. Apparently, he would limit the court to determining if a formal sentence of drawing and quartering was considered bad form by 1791. New Jersey Law Journal, p. 21.
21.
Presley v. Etowah County Commission, 502 U.S. 491 (1992).
22.
Puddington, A. (1992). Clarence Thomas and the Blacks. Commentary, 93, 28-33.
23.
Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992).
24.
Rubin, H. (1991, July 31). NAACP opposes Thomas. Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, p. 1.
25.
Saunders, D.J. (1991a, July 19). Clarence Thomas' sin, he thinks for himself. The Los Angles Daily Journal, p. 6
26.
Saunders, D.J. (1991b, October 25). Feminists lost far more than a battle over Thomas. The Los Angeles Daily Journal, p. 6.
27.
Silk, M. (1991, September 12). Nominee's views emanate from conservative fringe. The Los Angles Daily Journal, p. 6.
28.
Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 (1880).
29.
Taylor, S., Jr. (1992 March 16). Justice Thomas strikes cruel and unusual pose. New Jersey Law Journal, p. 16.
30.
Thomas, C. (1987). Toward a plain reading of the Constitution—The Declaration of Independence in constitutional interpretation. Howard Law Journal, 30, 983-995.
31.
United States v. Fordice, 505 U.S. 717 (1992).
32.
Wyoming v. Oklahoma, 502 U.S. 437 (1992).
33.
The youngest justice is the cruelest of the bunch (editorial. ( 1992, March 4). The Los Angles Daily Journal, p. 6.
