BaratzJ. (1969) “A bidialectal task for determining language proficiency in economically disadvantaged negro children.” Child Development40: 889–901.
2.
BaratzS.BaratzJ. (1970) “Early childhood intervention: the social science base of institutional racism.” Harvard Educational Rev. 40, 1: 29–50.
3.
BarlettE.J. (1971) Adventures in Living: A Pre-school Program. New York: Western.
4.
BeckerH. (1962) “Career patterns of public school teachers.” J. of Soc.57: 470–477.
5.
CarrollJ. (1972) Test and reviews, pp 814–825 in BurosO.K. (ed.) The Seventh Mental Measurement Yearbook. Highland Park, NJ: Gryphon.
6.
CombsA. [ed.] (1962) A perceptual view of the adequate personality. Perceiving, Behaving, Becoming: A Focus for Education. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
7.
ClarkK. (1964) Clash of cultures in the classroom, in WeinbergM. (ed.) Learning Together. Chicago: Integrated Education Associates.
8.
DillardJ.L. (1972) Black English. New York: Random House.
9.
FasoldR.WolframW. (1970) Some linguistic features of Negro dialect, pp. 41–86 in FasoldR.ShuyR. (eds.) Teaching Standard English in the Inner City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
10.
GroffP. (1963) Dissatisfaction in teaching the CD child. Phi Delta Kappan45: 76.
11.
HallW. (1975) Some evidence to be learned from the dialect research. Presented at NIE Conference No. 48: Test Bias, Annapolis, Maryland (December).
12.
HallW.S.FreadleR.O. (1973) “A developmental investigation of standard and nonstandard English among Black and white children.” Human Development16: 440–464.
13.
JohnsonK. (1971) Teacher's attitude toward the nonstandard Negro dialect—lets change it. National Council of Teachers of English (February) 171–184.
14.
JohnsonK. (1969) The language of Black Children. in GreenR. (ed.) Racial Crisis in American EducationChicago: Follett Educational Corp.
15.
KargerG. (1973) “Performance of lower-class Black and lower-class white children on the Wepman Auditory Discrimination Test: the effects of dialect and training and the relationship to reading achievement.” Ed. DissertationD., Harvard University.
16.
LabovW. (1970) The logic of nonstandard English, in WilliamsF. (ed.) Language and Poverty Chicago: Markham.
17.
Office of Child Development (1974) Department of Health, Education and Welfare National Survey to Head Start Services to the Handicapped Children. Washington, DC: Office of Child Development.
18.
—– (1973a) Department of Health, Education and Welfare Transmittal Notice—Head Start Policy Manual. N-30-333-1 On Head Start Services to Handicapped Children (February). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
19.
—– (1973b) Department of Health, Education and Welfare National Survey of Head Start Services to Handicapped Children. Lansing, MI: Systems Research Incorporated.
20.
OsserH.WangM.ZaidF. (1969) “The young child's ability to imitate and comprehend speech: a comparison of two subcultural groups.” Child Development40: 1063–1076.
21.
PolizerR.TaylorO.Rhodes-HOOVERM. (1975) Bias in achievement and diagnostic reading tests: a linguistic-oriented view. Presented at NIE Conference, Annapolis, Maryland (December).
22.
QuayL.C. (1974) “Language dialect, age, and intelligence test performance in disadvantaged black children.” Child Development45: 463–468.
23.
QuayL.C. (1972) “Negro dialect and Binet performance in severely disadvantaged Black four-year-olds.” Child Development43: 245–250.
24.
QuayL.C. (1971) “Language dialect, reinforcement, and the intelligence test performance of Negro children.” Child Development42: 5–15.
25.
RosenthalR. (1973) The Pygmalion effect lives. Psychology Today (September): 56–63.
26.
WaddellK.J.CahoonD.D. (1970) “Comments on the use of the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities with culturally deprived children in the rural South.” Perceptual and Motor Skills31: 56–58.
27.
WilliamsR.RiversW. (1972) Mismatches in testing from Black English. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Aśsociation, Honolulu, Hawaii.
28.
WolframW. (1974) Levels of sociolinguistic bias in testing. (Mimeo)