Fighting the Machine: NAACP Institutional Responses to Police Brutality From Jim Crow to Early Civil Rights

Abstract

This article examines the NAACP’s campaign against police brutality from 1937 to 1965, drawing on over 90 case files from the association’s national archives. Using a Critical Race Theory framework, it analyzes how the NAACP developed investigatory, judicial, and media tactics to counteract systematic racial abuse in the absence of state accountability. The study identifies a shift from reactive legalism to a more expansive activism model that blended evidence collection, public exposure, and community-driven narratives to challenge official impunity. Despite the 1945 Screws v. United States decision, which theoretically expanded federal authority, the Department of Justice consistently declined to pursue prosecution, forcing the NAACP to develop alternative accountability mechanisms. This multi-level organizational approach, shaped by tactical adaptation and bureaucratic learning, demonstrates the power of administrative infrastructure in sustaining civil rights work beyond landmark court cases. By focusing on how the NAACP treated police brutality as both a constitutional and epistemic crisis, the article illuminates broader implications for understanding organizational memory, movement strategy, and the ongoing struggle for racial justice in hostile legal environments.

Plain Language Summary

How the NAACP Fought Police Brutality Before the Civil Rights Act and What It Means for Today

Between 1937 and 1965, Black Americans faced routine police violence with almost no government accountability, and this study draws on more than ninety case files from the NAACP’s national archives to show how the organization responded. Early on, the NAACP relied mainly on legal action after incidents occurred, but over time it built a broader system: gathering and standardizing evidence, supporting community members in documenting abuses, and working with journalists to bring those stories to public attention. When a 1945 Supreme Court decision (Screws v. United States) appeared to give the federal government greater authority to prosecute abusive officers, the Department of Justice still refused to act, forcing the NAACP to deepen its own accountability infrastructure instead. What the case files reveal across these decades is careful, cumulative learning, as the organization kept detailed records, revisited earlier cases, and carried those lessons forward in ways that made it faster and more effective over time. By treating police violence as both a legal problem and a question of whose accounts were believed and whose were dismissed, the NAACP sustained a long campaign in a deeply hostile environment, offering lessons about organizational persistence and community-driven accountability that remain relevant to reform efforts today.

Keywords

NAACP police brutality civil rights organizations organizational advocacy Screws decision movement strategy Critical Race Theory archival analysis organizational memory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Belknap

M. R.

(1987). Federal law and southern order: Racial violence and constitutional conflict in the post-Brown South. University of Georgia Press.

Bell

(2000). Police brutality portent of disaster and discomforting divergence. In Nelson

(Ed.), Police brutality: An anthology (pp. 88–101). W.W. Norton & Company.

Blackmon

D. A.

(2008). Slavery by another name: The re-enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II. Anchor Books.

Carr

R. K.

(1947). Federal protection of civil rights: Quest for a sword. Cornell University Press.

Corbin

Strauss

(Eds.). (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage.

Cortner

R. C.

(1968). A mob intent on death: The NAACP and the Arkansas riot cases. Wesleyan University Press.

Crenshaw

Gotanda

Peller

Thomas

(Eds.). (1995). Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement. New Press.

Crenshaw

K. W.

(1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101(7), 1331–1387.

Delgado

(1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87(8), 2411–2441.

10.

Delgado

Stefancic

(Eds.). (2012). Critical race theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York University Press.

11.

Denzin

N. K.

(Ed.). (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

12.

Equal Justice Initiative. (2017). Lynching in America: Confronting the legacy of racial terror (3rd ed.). Equal Justice Initiative.

13.

Fraser

(1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 8(25/26), 56–80.

14.

Freeman

A. D.

(1978). Legitimizing racial discrimination through antidiscrimination law: A critcal review of Supreme Court doctrine. Minnesota Law Review, 62(6), 1049–1119.

15.

Gaby

Caren

Karatasli

(2019). Exculpating injustice: Coroner constructions of white innocence in the postbellum South. Social Problems, 66(4), 564–585.

16.

Hadden

S. E.

(2001). Slave patrols: Law and violence in Virginia and the Carolinas. Harvard University Press.

17.

Hartman

(2008). Lose your mother: A journey along the Atlantic slave route. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

18.

Kluger

(1976). Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s struggle for equality. Knopf.

19.

Konvitz

M. R.

(1961). A century of civil rights. Columbia University Press.

20.

Lewis

D. L.

(2000). W.E.B. Du Bois: The fight for equality and the American century, 1919–1963. Henry Holt.

21.

McAdam

(1982). Political process and the development of Black insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago Press.

22.

Morris

A. D.

(1984). The origins of the civil rights movement: Black communities organizing for change. Free Press.

23.

Muhammad

K. G.

(2010). The condemnation of Blackness: Race, crime, and the making of modern urban America. Harvard University Press.

24.

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Records. (1937–1965). NAACP Records, 1842–1999 [Manuscript collection]. Library of Congress Manuscript Division.

25.

Powell

W. W.

DiMaggio

P. J.

(Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago Press.

26.

Scott

W. R.

(Ed.). (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage.

27.

Screws v. United States (1945). Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91.

28.

Smallwood

S. E.

(2007). Saltwater slavery: A middle passage from Africa to American diaspora. Harvard University Press.

29.

Tarrow

(Ed.). (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

30.

Trouillot

M. R.

(1995). Silencing the past: Power and the production of history. Beacon Press.

31.

Turner

K. B.

Giacopassi

Vandiver

(2006). Ignoring the past: Coverage of slavery and slave patrols in criminal justice texts. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 17(1), 181–195.

32.

Tushnet

M. V.

(1987). The NAACP’s legal strategy against segregated education, 1925–1950. University of North Carolina Press.

33.

Vitale

A. S.

(2017). The end of policing. Verso.

34.

Walker

(2005). The new world of police accountability. Sage.

35.

Williams

P. J.

(1991). The alchemy of race and rights. Harvard University Press.