US Media,Selective Exposure,and the Promotion of COVID-19 Vaccinations in Black and Latino Communities

Abstract

Through selective exposure, this study examined the role the US news media played in encouraging or discouraging minority races from getting vaccinated. Through content analysis and focus groups, we were able to demonstrate that most media messages focused on prior beliefs in their reporting, therefore, discouraging the black and Latino minorities from getting the COVID-19 vaccinations. Further, while blacks and Latinos based their fears of the vaccines on health effects, white respondents were more concerned about government surveillance and the desire to go back to “normal” life after the quarantine. Ultimately, white respondents were more positive about vaccination arguing that they were tired of the quarantine and wanted normal life back.

Keywords

selective exposure minorities confirmation bias congeniality bias COVID-19 vaccines

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allan

(2017). Information literacy and confirmation bias: You can lead a person to information, but can you make him think? https://asu-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2346.1/30699/Confirmation%20bias%20and%20information%20literacy.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Atkin

C. K.

(1985). Informational utility and selective exposure to entertainment media. In Zillmann

Bryant

(Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 63–91). Routledge.

Aufderheide

(1990). After the fairness doctrine: Controversial broadcast programming and the public interest. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 47–72.

Barnidge

Gunther

A. C.

Kim

Hong

Perryman

Tay

S. K.

Knisely

(2020). Politically motivated selective exposure and perceived media bias. Communication Research, 47(1), 82–103.

Beckers

Walgrave

Van Den Bulck

(2018). Opinion balance in Vox Pop television news. Journalism Studies, 19(2), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1187576

Benedictis-Kessner

Baum

M. A.

Berinsky

Yamamoto

(2019). Persuading the enemy: Estimating the persuasive effects of partisan media with the preference-incorporating choice and assignment design. American Political Science Review, 113, 902–916.

Blanchard

M. A.

(1977). The Hutchins commission, the press and the responsibility concept. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 49, 1.

Chomsky

Herman

E. S.

(1994). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Vintage Books.

Eagly

Chaiken

(1998). Attitude structure. Handbook of Social Psychology, 1, 269–322.

10.

Festinger

(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.

11.

Figenschou

T. U.

(2010). A voice for the voiceless? A quantitative content analysis of Al-Jazeera English’s flagship news. Global Media and Communication, 6(1), 85–107.

12.

Freedman

J. L.

Sears

D. O.

(1965). Selective exposure. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57–97). Academic Press.

13.

Freelon

D. G.

(2010). ReCal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 20–33.

14.

Garrett

R. K

. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59(4), 676–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x

15.

Garrett

R. K.

Stroud

N. J.

(2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and- news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680–701.

16.

Gondwe

(2017). Are late night TV shows polarizing society? Examining the ambivalence of new version of political partisanship in the United States. Global Media Journal, 15(29), 1–6.

17.

Groeling

(2013). Media bias by the numbers: Challenges and opportunities in the empirical study of partisan news. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 129–151.

18.

Hart

Richardson

Tortoriello

G. K.

Earl

(2020). ‘You Are What You Read:’ Is selective exposure a way people tell us who they are? British Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 417–442.

19.

Hernández

Madrid-Morales

(2020). Diversifying voice, democratizing the news? A content analysis of citizen news sources in Spanish-language international broadcasting. Journalism Studies, 21(8), 1076–1092.

20.

Hutchens

M. J.

Hmielowski

J. D.

Beam

M. A.

(2019). Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization. Communication Monographs, 86(3), 357–376.

21.

Jones

Sugden

(2001). Positive confirmation bias in the acquisition of information. Theory and Decision, 50(1), 59–99.

22.

Kim

S. H.

(2015). Who is responsible for a social problem? News framing and attribution of responsibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(3), 554–558.

23.

Klaehn

(2002). A critical review and assessment of Herman and Chomsky’s ‘Propaganda Model’. European Journal of Communication, 17(2), 147–182.

24.

Knobloch-Westerwick

Mothes

Polavin

(2020). Confirmation bias, ingroup bias, and negativity bias in selective exposure to political information. Communication Research, 47(1), 104–124.

25.

Lueck

J. A.

Spiers

(2020). Which beliefs predict intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19? A mixed-methods reasoned action approach applied to health communication. Journal of Health Communication, 25(10), 790–798.

26.

Madrid-Morales

Wasserman

Gondwe

Ndlovu

Sikanku

Tully

Uzuegbunam

(2021). Comparative approaches to mis/disinformation| motivations for sharing misinformation: A comparative study in six Sub-Saharan African countries. Journal of International Communication, 15, 20.

27.

McChesney

R. W.

(2001). The global media: The new missionaries of corporate capitalism. Continuum.

28.

Melki

Kozman

(2021). Selective exposure during uprisings: Examining the public’s news consumption and sharing tendencies during the 2019 Lebanon protests. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26, 907–928.

29.

Nelson

J. L.

Webster

J. G.

(2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3), 2056305117729314.

30.

Neuendorf

K. A.

Kumar

(2015). Content analysis. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 1, 1–10.

31.

Pickard

(2018). The strange life and death of the fairness doctrine: Tracing the decline of positive freedoms in American policy discourse. Journal of International Communication, 12, 3434.

32.

Siebert

F. T.

Peterson

T. B.

Schramm

(1956). Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility, and Soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do (Vol. 10). University of Illinois Press.

33.

Stemler

S. E.

(2015). Content analysis. In Scott

Kosslyn

(Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource (pp. 1–14). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

34.

Stroud

N. J.

(2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 556–576.

35.

Stroud

N. J.

(2017). Selective exposure theories. In Kenski

Jamieson

K. H.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication. Oxford Handbooks Online.

36.

Sude

D. J.

Knobloch-Westerwick

Robinson

M. J.

Westerwick

(2019). “Pick and choose” opinion climate: How browsing of political messages shapes public opinion perceptions and attitudes. Communication Monographs, 86(4), 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2019.1612528

37.

Taber

C. S.

Lodge

(2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769.

38.

Tajfel

(1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press.

39.

Turner

J. C.

(1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In Lawler

E. J.

(Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77–121). JAI Press.

40.

Valentino

N. A.

Gregorowicz

Groenendyk

E. W.

(2009). Efficacy, emotions and the habit of participation. Political Behavior, 31(3), 307–330.

41.

Velasquez

Barnidge

Rojas

(2021). Group consciousness and corrective action: The mediating role of perceived media bias and of proattitudinal selective exposure. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98, 105–125.

42.

Westen

Blagov

P. S.

Harenski

Kilts

Hamann

(2006). Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(11), 1947–1958.

43.

Westerwick

Sude

Robinson

Knobloch-Westerwick

(2020). Peers versus pros: Confirmation bias in selective exposure to user-generated versus professional media messages and its consequences. Mass Communication & Society, 23(4), 510–536.

44.

Winter

Metzger

M. J.

Flanagin

A. J.

(2016). Selective use of news cues: A multiple-motive perspective on information selection in social media environments. Journal of Communication, 66(4), 669–693.

45.

Wojcieszak

(2021). What predicts selective exposure online: Testing political attitudes, credibility, and social identity. Communication Research, 48(5), 687–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219844868

46.

Woko

Siegel

Hornik

(2020). An investigation of low COVID-19 vaccination intentions among Black Americans: The role of behavioral beliefs and trust in COVID-19 information sources. Journal of Health Communication, 25(10), 819–826.