The epistemological positioning that frequently validates the application of cultural probes in eliciting detailed exploration of phenomenon has not been sufficiently interrogated. Yet the epistemological assumptions behind the value of cultural probes continue to be drummed up and foisted on Africa’s emerging ethnographic researchers who actually need to be a bit more critical in its adoption and application. This conceptual paper explores the extant literature on data collection based essentially on cultural probes as espoused in habitus. It is proposed that profound amounts of decolonization of the spirit, content, and process of data gathering is urgent and critical at this stage. Until this is done objectively, African ethnographic researchers should “look at the gift horse in the mouth” before they can properly configure what is right or wrong for the people of Africa who should be in the hot pursuit of the ownership, production and utilization of relevant and sacrosanct knowledge aimed at rapid socio-economic and political development of the continent.
AbdiA. A. (2015). Decolonizing global citizenship education: Critical reflections on the epistemic intersections of location, knowledge, and learning. In AbdiA.ShultzL.PillayT. (Eds.), Decolonizing global citizenship education (pp. 11–26). Sense Publishers.
2.
AlatasS. F. (2008). Intellectual and structural challenges to academic dependency. SEPHIS.
3.
AsanteM. K. (2020). I am afrocentric and pan-African: A response to Tawanda Sydesky Nyawasha on Scholarship in South Africa. Journal of Black Studies, 51(3), 203–212.
4.
ChilisaB. (2012). Indigenous research methodology. Sage.
Duval-DiopD. (2016). Unveiling the bias within: The power of a single narrative to oppress the P in Participatory. In DrameE. R.IrbyD. (Eds.), Black participatory research: Power, identity and the struggle for justice in education (pp. 150–165). Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
ElderB. C.OdoyoK. O. (2018). Multiple methodologies: Using community-based participatory research and decolonizing methodologies in Kenya. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(4), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1422290.
8.
FanonF. (1963). The wretched of the earth. Grove Press.
9.
FerriB. (2006). Teaching in trouble. In DanforthS.GabelS. (Eds.), Vital questions facing disability studies in education (pp. 289–306). Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
10.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
GaverW. H.BoucherA.PenningtonS.WalkerB. (2004). Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions-Funology, 11(5), 53–56.
13.
GaverW.DunneA.PacentiE. (1999). Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21–29.
14.
GonzalezY.GonzalezE. M.LincolnY. S. (2008). Decolonizing qualitative research: Non-traditional reporting forms in the academy. In DenzingN. K.GardingM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the conservative challenge. Left Coast Press.
15.
GoopyS.KassanA. (2019). Arts-based engagement ethnography: An approach for making research engaging and knowledge transferable when working with harder-to-reach communities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918820424.
16.
GoopyS.LloydD. (2006). Documenting the human condition in everyday culture: Finding a partnership between ethnography and photo-documentary. International Journal of the Humanities, 3, 33–38.
17.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–215). Sage.
18.
GumedeV. (2011). The role of public policies and policy makers in africa: Responding to global economic crises. In LeeD. R.NduloM. (Eds.), The food and financial crises in sub-Saharan Africa: Origin, impacts, and policy implications (pp. 264–279). CABI International.
19.
GumedeV. (2017). Leadership for Africa’s development: Revisiting indigenous African leadership and setting the Agenda for political leadership. Journal of Black Studies, 48(1), 74–90.
20.
HallS. (1999). Cultural identity and diaspora. In RutherfordJ. (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.
21.
HeldM. B. E. (2019). Decolonizing research paradigms in the context of settler colonialism: An unsettling, mutual, and collaborative effort. International Journal of Qualitative Method, 18, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1173/1609.406918821574.
22.
HumphreyJ. (2000). Researching disability politics, or, some problems with the social model in practices. Disability and Society, 15(1), 63–86.
LincolnY. S.GonzalezY. (2008). The search for emerging methodologies in qualitative research: Further strategies for liberatory and democratic inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(5), 784–805.
25.
MartensD. M. (2015). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods (4th ed.). Sage.
26.
MwauraN. (2005). Kenya today: Breaking the yoke of colonialism in Africa. Algora Pub.
27.
OchockJ.MoorlagE.JanzenR. (2010). A framework for entry: PAR values and engagement strategies in community research. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 3, 1–19.
28.
OmobowaleA. D.AkanleO. (2017). Asuwada epistemology and globalised sociology: Challenges of the south. International Journal of Sociology, 5(1), 43–59.
29.
OyebadeB. (1990). African studies and the Afrocentric paradigm. A critique. Journal of Black Studies, 21(2), 233–238.
30.
Robinson-PantA. (2005). Cross-cultural perspectives on educational research. Open University Press.
31.
SesantiS. (2015). Teaching African philosophy in African institutions of higher learning: The implications for African renaissance. South African Journal of Philosophy, 34(3), 346–357.
32.
SesantiS. (2016). Africa philosophy in pursuit of an African renaissance for the true liberation of women. Journal of Black Studies, 47, 479–496.
33.
SesantiS. (2020). Routledge handbook of pan-Africanism. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies-Multi, Inter, and Trans-disciplinarity, 15(2), 134–136.
34.
SmithL. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. University of Otago Press.
TempleB. (2006). Being bilingual: Issues for cross-language research. Journal of Research Practice, 2: M2. Retrieved November 19, 2019 from http://jrp.icaap.org/content/vZ.I/temple.html
37.
WilsonS. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood.
