The “N-word.” It’s what one scholar called “the nuclear bomb or racial epithets.” Few words are so abhorrent that just their utterance can provoke rage, hatred, and conflict. Unlike other slurs, it is perhaps the only one so vile that it has been truncated to a single letter: “N-” (i.e., the “N-word”), because of the negative connotations associated with it. This analysis addresses the N-word from multiple perspectives. It first examines the etiology of the word and how it became the derisive term it is today. Second, it examines the legal problems that courts have had in banning it as a form of hate speech, and how the N-word blurs the line between speech and conduct. Third, and finally, this analysis details how understanding the intent of the speaker, and using a victim-centered approach, can assist in creating polices that curtail the use of the problematic N-word.
AmarA. R. (1992). The case of the missing amendments: R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul. Harvard Law Review, 106, 124-161.
2.
AsimJ. (2007). The N Word: Who can say it, who shouldn’t and why. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
3.
AuxierA. H. (2007). Tiptoeing through the junkyard: Three approaches to the moral dilemma of racist hate speech. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 21, 215-261.
4.
Beauharnais v. Illinois, 343 U.S. 250 (1952).
5.
BellJ. (2004). O say, can you see: Free expression by the light of fiery crosses. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 39, 335-389.
6.
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).
7.
BransonH. R. (1987). The hazards in black higher education: Program and commitment needs. The Journal of Negro Education, 56, 129-136.
8.
A Brief History of the Ku Klux Klan. (1996-1997). The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 14, 32.
9.
CarterW. M.Jr. (2007). Race, rights, and the Thirteenth Amendment: Defining the badges and incidents of slavery. University of California-Davis Law Review, 40, 1311-1379.
10.
ChafeeZ. (1919). Freedom of speech in wartime. Harvard Law Review, 32, 932-973.
11.
Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).
12.
ChesterJ. C. (1991). The wolf by the ears: Thomas Jefferson and slavery. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
13.
ChideyaF. (1999). The color of our future. New York, NY: William Morrow.
14.
ClarkK. B. (1963). Prejudice and your child (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
15.
CrowleyA. L. (1993). R.A.V. v. city of St. Paul: How the supreme court missed the writing on the wall. Boston College Law Review, 34, 771-801.
16.
Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).
17.
EntmanR. (1990). Modern racism and the images of Blacks in local television news. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7, 332-345.
18.
Gitlow v. People of New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925).
John-HallA. (2007, June26). A terrible weapon consigned to oblivion. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. B01.
21.
KennedyR. (2003). Nigger: The strange career of a troublesome word. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
22.
KlugerR. (1977). Simple justice: The history of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America’s struggle for equality. New York, NY: Random House.
23.
KuglerS. (2007, March1). New York joins N.J.towns that say “no” to the N-word—Measure asks citizens to avoid racial slur. The Star-ledger, p. 18.
24.
LawrenceF. M. (1993). Resolving the hate crimes/hate speech paradox: Punishing bias crimes and protecting racist speech. Notre Dame Law Review, 68, 673-721.
25.
Lewis v. City of New Orleans, 415 U.S. 130 (1974).
26.
MacKinnonC. A. (1985). Pornography, civil rights & speech. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 20(1), 299-310.
27.
MatsudaM. J. (1989). Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim’s story. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2320-2381.
28.
MatsudaM. J.LawrenceC. R.III.DelgadoR. D.CrenshawK. C. (1993). Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the First Amendment. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
29.
Michael Barnes, prosecuting attorney of St. Joseph County, Indiana, et al. v. Glenn Theatre Inc., et al., 501 U.S. 560 (1991).
30.
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).
31.
Niggas Wit Attitudes. (1991). Real Niggaz don’t die [Recorded by N.W.A.]. On Straight Outta Compton [CD]. Compton, CA: Ruthless Records.
32.
OdeaC. J.MillerS. S.AndresE. B.RayM. H.TillD. F.SaucierD. A. (2015). Out of bounds: Factors affecting the perceived offensiveness of racial slurs. Language Sciences, 52, 155-164.
33.
OhlineH. A. (1971). Republicanism and slavery: Origins of the three-fifths clause in the United States Constitution. The William and Mary Quarterly, 28, 563-584.
34.
OleckJ. (2007). Schools make effort to ban the “N-word”: A growing number of cities are symbolically banning the racist word. School Library Journal, 53(4), 20.
35.
PilkingtonE. (2007, March1). New York City council bans the use of the N-word: Motion forbidding term is purely symbolic Black artists urged to rein back in song lyrics. London Guardian, p. 21.
36.
RabinC. (2007, May15). Ban the N-word, commissioner says: A Miami-Date County commissioner is proposing a moratorium on the use of a racial slur—A symbolic gesture that would carry no punishment for violators. The Miami Herald, p. 1B.
37.
R.A.V. (Petitioner) v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota, 505 U.S. 377 (1992).
38.
Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).
39.
SearsD. (1988). Symbolic racism. In KatzP.TaylorD. (Eds.), Eliminating racism (p. 53-84). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Thomas-LesterA. (2007, May2). Stomping the N-word: Movement to ban slur crosses communities. The Washington Post, p. B01. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).
45.
Virginia (Petitioner) v. Barry Elton Black, Richard J. Elliott, and Jonathan O’Mara, 538 U.S. 343 (2003).
46.
WilliamsP. (1987). Spirit-murdering the messenger: The discourse of finger pointing as the Law’s Response to Racism. University of Miami Law Review, 42, 127-157.
47.
Wisconsin (Petitioner), v. Todd Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476 (1993).
48.
Y.G. (2013). Ride for my MF nigga (featuring Rich Homie & Jeezy) [Recorded by Y.G.]. On Boss Yo Life Up Gang. Atlanta, GA: Corporate Thugs Entertainment Record label.
