Public opinion about gay rights is often shaped by egalitarian values. While the extant literature has suggested that African Americans’ value structure tends to be very egalitarian, many popular media accounts as well as some scholarly research indicate that Blacks have, at times, opposed gay rights. We assert that when the media frame gay rights as equality issues, Blacks are more likely to rely on egalitarianism to form their opinions. We use content analysis to show that equality framing of gay rights dramatically increased in 2012, and we use national survey data to show that Blacks’ support for marriage equality also precipitously rose beginning in 2012. Then, we use data from an original framing experiment to show that exposure to an equality frame does, indeed, encourage Blacks to be more reliant on their egalitarian values to form an opinion about same-sex marriage and to be more supportive of the policy.
AbrajanoM. (2010). Are Blacks and Latinos responsible for the passage of Proposition 8? Analyzing voter attitudes on California’s proposal to ban same-sex marriage in 2008. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 922-932.
2.
AndersenR.FetnerT. (2008). Cohort differences in tolerance of homosexuality: Attitudinal change in Canada and the United States, 1981-2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 311-330.
3.
BramlettB. H. (2012). The cross-pressures of religion and contact with gays and lesbians, and their impact on same-sex marriage opinion. Politics & Policy, 40, 13-42.
4.
BrewerP. R. (2003a). The shifting foundations of public opinion about gay rights. Journal of Politics, 65, 1208-1220.
5.
BrewerP. R. (2003b). Values, political knowledge, and public opinion about gay rights. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 173-201.
6.
BrewerP. R. (2008). Value war: Public opinion and the politics of gay rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
BrumbaughS. M.SanchezL. A.NockS. L.WrightJ. D. (2008). Attitudes toward gay marriage in states undergoing marriage law transformation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 70, 345-359.
8.
Calhoun-BrownA. (1998). The politics of Black evangelicals: What hinders diversity in the Christian right?American Politics Quarterly, 26, 81-109.
9.
ChongD. (1993). How people think, reason, and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 867-899.
10.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101, 637-655.
11.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. N. (2013). Counterframing effects. Journal of Politics, 75, 1-16.
CraigS. C.MartinezM. D.KaneJ. G.GainousJ. (2005). Core values, value conflict, and citizens’ ambivalence about gay rights. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 5-17.
14.
DawesR. M. (1988). Rational choice in an uncertain world. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
15.
DruckmanJ. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?Journal of Politics, 63, 1041-1066.
16.
DruckmanJ. N.PetersonE.SlothuusR. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107, 57-79.
FeldmanS. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 416-440.
19.
FeldmanS. (2003). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In Sears, L.D. O.HuddyJervisR. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477-508). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
FeldmanS.ZallerJ. (1992). The political culture of ambivalence: Ideological responses to the welfare state. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 268-307.
21.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (1984). Social cognition (1st ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22.
GamsonW. A.ModiglianiA. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action.In BraungartR. G.BraungartM. M. (Eds.), Research in political sociology (Vol. 3, pp. 137-177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23.
GhavamiN.JohnsonK. L. (2011). Comparing sexual and ethnic minority perspectives on same-sex marriage. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 394-412.
24.
GlickS. N.GoldenM. R. (2010). Persistence of racial differences in attitudes toward homosexuality in the United States. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 55, 516-523.
GorenP. (2001). Core principles and policy reasoning in mass publics: A test of two theories. British Journal of Political Science, 31, 159-177.
27.
GorenP. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 881-896.
28.
HarrisF. C. (1999). Something within: Religion in African-American political activism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
HenryP. J.ReynaC. (2007). Value judgments: The impact of perceived value violations on American political attitudes. Political Psychology, 28, 273-298.
30.
HerekG. M.CapitanioJ. P. (1995). Black heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 95-105.
31.
HicksG. R.LeeT. (2006). Public attitudes toward gays and lesbians: Trends and predictors. Journal of Homosexuality, 51, 57-77.
32.
JacobyW. G. (2006). Value choices and American public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 706-723.
33.
JohnsonT. (2012). Equality, morality, and the impact of media framing: Explaining opposition to same-sex marriage and civil unions. Politics & Policy, 40, 1053-1080.
34.
KinderD. R.SandersL. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
KinderD. R.WinterN. (2001). Exploring the racial divide: Blacks, Whites, and opinion on national policy. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 439-456.
LaneR. E. (1962). Political ideology: Why the American common man believes what he does. New York, NY: Free Press.
38.
LewisG. B. (2003). Black-White differences in attitudes toward homosexuality and gay rights. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 59-78.
39.
LewisG. B.GossettC. W. (2008). Changing public opinion on same-sex marriage: The case of California. Politics & Policy, 36, 4-30.
40.
LoftusJ. (2001). America’s liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review, 66, 762-782.
41.
McCannJ. A. (1997). Electoral choices and core value change: The 1992 presidential campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 564-583.
42.
McCloskeyH.ZallerJ. (1984). The American ethos: Public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
McDanielE. L.EllisonC. (2008). God’s party? Race, religion, and partisanship over time. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 180-191.
44.
MorganG. S.MullenE.SkitkaL. J. (2010). When values and attributions collide: Liberals’ and conservatives’ values motivate attributions for alleged misdeeds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1241-1254.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
57.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values?Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
58.
ShahD. V.DomkeD.WackmanD. B. (1996). To thine own self be true: Values, framing, and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23, 509-560.
59.
SherkatD. E.de VriesK. M.CreekS. (2010). Race, religion, and opposition to same-sex marriage. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 80-98.
60.
SimonH. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. New York, NY: John Wiley.
61.
SlothuusR.de VreeseC. H. (2010). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. Journal of Politics, 72, 630-645.
62.
SteenslandB. (2008). Why do policy frames change? Actor-idea coevolution in debates over welfare reform. Social Forces, 86, 1027-1054.
63.
WeisbergH. J. (2005). The structure and effects of moral predispositions in contemporary American politics. Journal of Politics, 67, 646-668.
64.
WilcoxC.NorranderB. (2002). Of moods and morals: The dynamics of opinion on abortion and gay rights. In NorranderB.WilcoxC. (Eds.), Understanding public opinion (2nd ed., pp. 121-147). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
65.
WilcoxC.WolpertR. (2000). Gay rights in the public sphere: Public opinion on gay and lesbian equality. In RimmermanC. A.WaldK. D.WilcoxC. (Eds.), The politics of gay rights (pp. 409-432). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
