The impact of Part B, Section 326, of the Title III program was assessed using data from three historically Black universities. Part B, Section 326, of the Title III program aims at strengthening the resource capacity of historically Black colleges and universities with eligible doctoral and professional programs. The lack of documented impact contributes to ongoing skepticism regarding program efficacy. A web-based survey instrument, with one version for administrators and faculty and another version for students, was used for data collection. The participants were asked to rank the impact of the program using a five-ordered Likert-type scale. The questions were grouped into multiple domains. Findings from this study suggest that increased stakeholder input needs to be utilized when communicating the success of the Title III program for wider support and advocacy.
AbelmanR.DalessandroA. (2009). The institutional vision of historically Black colleges and universities. Journal of Black Studies, 40(2), 105-134.
2.
BorenS.IrwinP.LykeB.RiddleW.StedmanJ.FraasC.. . . GregoryW. (1987). The higher education amendments of 1986 (P.L. 99-498): A summary of revisions. 87-187 EPW (ED294485). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov
3.
BrownL. (2009). The perceptions of college and university personnel on the impact of Title III program on strengthening institutional programs at selected historically Black colleges and universities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Jackson State University, Jackson, MS.
Government Accountability Office. (2009). Low-income and minority serving institutions: Management attention to long-standing concerns needed to improve education’s oversight of grant programs. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Higher Education, Lifelong Learning, and Competitiveness, Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives (GAO-09-309). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09309.pdf
KendrickC. M. C. (1981). The impact of the advanced institutional development program on the curriculum of traditionally Black colleges and universities. Dissertation Abstracts International, 42(04), AA118120365.
12.
LikertL. A. (1932). Technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.
13.
LucasC. (1994). (Ed.). American higher education: A history. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
14.
National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education. (2009). HBCU and PBI policy recommendations for Obama economic stimulus package and first 100 days. Retrieved from http://www.nafeo.org/community/index.php
15.
NormanM. K. (1985). The impact of the advanced institutional development program on the institutional viability of seven Black 1890 land grant institutions (Title III) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia.
16.
PatrickE. M. (1992). A descriptive study of Title III fund use by historically Black colleges and universities since enactment of Part B of the 1986 Higher Education Act amendments (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Manfield.
17.
ScottG. A. (2007). Low-income and minority serving institutions: Education has taken steps to improve monitoring and assistance, but further progress is needed. Testimony before the Subcommittee on Higher Education, Lifelong Learning, and Competitiveness, Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives (Testimony, GAO-07-926T). Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07926t.pdf
18.
ScottG. A. (2010). Low-income and minority serving institutions: Sustained attention needed to improve education’s oversight of grant programs (Testimony, GAO-10-659T). Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10659t.pdf
WendlerC.BridgemanB.ClineF. (2010). The path forward: The future of graduate education in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Commission on the Future of Graduate Education in the United States.
