This study fills a gap in scholarship by exploring historical news coverage of interracial relationships. It examines coverage by The New York Times, Washington Post and Times-Herald, and Chicago Tribune of the progression of the landmark civil rights case of Loving v. Virginia, in which the Supreme Court overturned Virginia’s anti-miscegenation law, which prohibited marriage between any White and non-White person. An analysis of the frames and sources used in these publications’ news stories about the case indicate all three publications’ coverage favored the Lovings.
AdayS. (2006). The framesetting effects of news: An experimental test of advocacy versus objectivist. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 767-784.
2.
AltheideD. L. (1991). The impact of television news formats on social policy. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35, 3-22.
3.
AtwaterT.AnokwaK. (1991). Race relations in Ebony: An analysis of interracial statements in selected feature stories. Journal of Black Studies, 21(3), 268-278.
4.
BlumlerJ. G.GurevitchM. (1982). The political effects of mass communication. In GurevitchM.BennetT.CurranJ.WoollacottJ. (Eds.), Culture, society, and the media (pp. 30-47). London, UK: Routledge.
5.
BratterJ. L.KingR. B. (2008). “But will it last?”: Marital instability among interracial and same-race couples. Family Relations, 57(2), 160-171.
6.
Commission on Freedom of the Press. (1947). A free and responsible press. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
de VreeseC. H. (2004). The effects of frames in political television news on issue interpretation and frame salience. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 36-52.
8.
DomkeD.McCoyK.TorresM. (1999). News media, racial perceptions, and political cognition. Communication Research, 26(5), 570-607.
9.
EntmanR. M. (1992). Blacks in the news: Television, modern racism, and cultural change. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 341-361.
10.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
11.
EntmanR. M. (1994). Representation and reality in the portrayal of Blacks on network television news. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 509-520.
12.
GainesS. O.Jr.RiosD. I.GranroseC. S.BledsoeK. L.FarrisK. R.YounM. S. P.GarciaB. F. (1999). Romanticism and interpersonal resource exchange among African American–Anglo and other interracial couples. Journal of Black Psychology, 25(4), 461-489.
13.
GamsonW. A. (1989). News as framing. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 157-161.
14.
GurevitchM.BennetT.CurranJ.WoollacottJ. (Eds.). (1982). Culture, society, and the media. London, UK: Routledge.
15.
Kerner Commission. (1968). Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16.
KillianK. D. (2001). Reconstituting racial histories and identities: The narratives of interracial couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27(1), 27-42.
17.
KillianK. D. (2002). Dominant and marginalized discourses in interracial couples’ narratives: Implications for family therapists. Family Process, 41(4), 603-618.
18.
KliteP.BardwellR. A.SalzmanJ. (1995). A day in the life of local TV news in America. Denver, CO: Rocky Mountain Media Watch.
19.
KliteP.BardwellR. A.SalzmanJ. (1997). Local TV news: Getting away with murder. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2, 102-112.
20.
LesterP. M. (1994). African-American photo coverage in four U.S. newspapers, 1937-1990. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 380-394.
21.
LesterP. M.SmithR. (1990). African-American photo coverage in Life, Newsweek, and Time, 1937-1988. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 136-145.
22.
LindsayL. A. (2005). A tragic romance, a nationalist symbol: The case of the murdered White lover in colonial Nigeria. Journal of Women’s History, 17(2), 118-143.
23.
Loving v. Commonwealth, 206 Va. 924, 147 S.E.2d 78 (1966).
24.
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967).
25.
PanZ.KosickiG. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In ReeseS. D.GandyO. H.GrantA. E. (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
PriceV.TewksburyC.PowersE. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481-506.
27.
ReeseS.GandyO.GrantA. (Eds.). (2001). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
RichardsonJ. D. (2005). Switching social identities: The influence of editorial framing on reader attitudes toward affirmative action and African Americans. Communication Research, 32(4), 503-528.
29.
RomerD.JamiesonK. H.de CoteauN. J. (1998). The treatment of persons of color in local television news: Ethnic blame discourse or realistic group conflict?Communication Research, 25(3), 286-306.
30.
SmithE. R. (1991). What color is the news? An ethnic content analysis of Bay area news media. San Francisco, CA: San Francisco State University Press.
31.
van DijkT. A. (1991). Racism and the press. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
van DijkT. A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
33.
WantaW.HuY. (1993). The agenda-setting effects of international news coverage: An examination of differing news frames. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 250-263.
34.
WeaverD. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57, 142-147.
35.
WhitehouseV. (2003). Coverage of racial tension. World and I, 18(2), 62-67.
