This study attempted to construct profiles of two types of African American divorcees: petitioners and nonpetitioners of divorce. Surveyed participants (n = 98) responded to questions concerning demographic variables, health status, length of stay in marriage, and 12 dimensions of self-cognition as predictors that discriminated between the two subgroups of divorcees. Discriminant analysis of these variables showed significant differences between petitioners and nonpetitioners. The divorcees’ perception of group activity was the highest contributor to the discriminant function, followed by self, and same-race relations. There was no significant difference in length of stay in marriage between the two divorcee groups, contrary to what has been reported in the literature for the two subgroups combined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldwin, J. A., & Bell, Y. A. (1985). The African self-consciousness scale: An Africentric personality questionnaire. Western Journal of Black Studies, 9, 61-68.
2.
Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., White, L. K., & Edwards, J. N. (1986). Divorce and marital instability over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 7, 421-442.
3.
Bramlett, M. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States. Vital Health Statistics, 23, 1-103.
4.
Breckler, S. J., Pratkanis, A. R., & McCann, C. D. (1991). The representation of self in multidimensional cognitive space. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 97-112.
5.
Buckle, L., Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Rodd, Z. A. (1996). Marriage as a reproductive contract: Patterns of marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 363-377.
6.
Carrere, S., & Gottman, J. M. (1999). Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion. Family Process, 38, 293-301.
7.
Chan, L. Y., & Heaton, T. B. (1989). Demographic determinants of delayed divorce. Journal of Divorce, 13, 97-112.
8.
Cherlin, A. J. (1998). Marriage and marital dissolution among Black Americans. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29(12), 147.
9.
Chikudate, N. (1991). Cross-cultural analysis of cognitive systems in organizations: A comparison between Japanese and American organizations. Management International Review, 31, 219-231.
10.
Cross, S. E., Bacon, P. L., & Morris, M. L. (2000). The relational-interdependent selfconstrual and relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 791-808.
11.
Ebling, R., & Leverson, R. W. (2003). Who are the marital experts? Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 130-142.
12.
Ellwood, D., & Crane, J. (1990). Family change among African Americans: What do we know? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4, 65-84.
13.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
Fowers, B. J., Lyons, E., Montel, K. H., & Shaked, N. (2001). Positive illusions about marriage among married and single individuals. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 95-109.
15.
Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1999). What predicts change in marital interaction over time. A study of alternative models. Family Process, 38, 143-158.
16.
Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K. S., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.
17.
Heaton, T. B. (1991). Time-related determinants of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 285-296.
18.
Heaton, T. B., & Blake, A. M. (1999). Gender differences in determinants of marital disruption. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 25-45.
19.
Hermans, H., Kempen, H., & van Loon, R. (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 23-33.
20.
Horiuchi, T. (1998). The multidimensional property of the self and self-reference effect. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 68, 484-490.
21.
Huston, T. L., Caughlin, J. P., Houts, R. M., Smith, S. E., & George, L. J. (2001). The connubial crucible: Newlywed years as predictors of marital delight, distress, and divorce. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 237-252.
22.
Jones, G. W., Asari, Y., & Djuartika, T. (1994). Divorce in West Java. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 25, 95.
23.
Joung, I.M.A., van de Mheen, H. D., Stronks, K., van Poppel, F.W.A., & Mackenbach, J. P. (1998). A longitudinal study of health selection in marital transitions. Social Science & Medicine, 46, 425-435.
24.
Kambon, K. (1996). Introduction to the African self-consciousness scale. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), Tests & measurement for research on Black populations. Hampton, VA: Cobb & Henry Publishers.
25.
Kar, N., & Kar, B. (2002). Social cognition and the participatory planning process. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(6), 377.
26.
Kim, M. S. (1993). Culture-based interactive constraints in explaining intercultural strategic competence. In R. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication competence (pp. 132-150). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Kposowa, A. J. (1998). The impact of race on divorce in the United States. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 29, 529-548.
28.
Kurdek, L. A., & Kennedy, C. (2001). Differences between couples who end their marriage by fault or no-fault legal procedures. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(2), 241-253.
29.
Larson, J. H., Newell, K., Topham, G., & Nichols, S. (2002). A review of three comprehensive premarital assessment questionnaires. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 233-239.
30.
Licata, N. (2002). Should premarital counseling be mandatory as a requisite to obtaining a marriage license? Family Court Review, 40, 518-532.
31.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
32.
Markus, H. R., Mullally, P. R., & Kitayama, S. (1997). Selfways: Diversity in modes of cultural participation. In U. Neisser & D. Jopling (Eds.), The conceptual self in context: Culture, experience, and self-understanding (pp. 13-61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1999). The (mental) ties that bind: Cognitive structures that predict relationship resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1228-1244.
34.
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1962). The process of creative thinking. In H. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63-119). New York: Atherton Press.
35.
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36.
Presser, H. B. (2000). Nonstandard work schedules and marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 93-111.
37.
Prigerson, H. G. (1999). The effects of marital dissolution and marital quality on health and health service use among women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1704.
38.
Rogge, R. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1999). Till violence does us part: The differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 340-351.
39.
Sayers, S. L., Kohn, C. S., & Heavey, C. (1998). Prevention of marital dysfunction: Behavioral approaches and beyond. Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 713-744.
40.
Schemo, D. J. (2001, November 10). In covenant marriage, forging ties that bind. New York Times, p. A10.
41.
Shiono, P. H., & Quinn, L. S. (1994). Epidemiology of divorce. Future Child, 4, 15-28.
42.
Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-201.
43.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). Bridging the gap between culture and communication. In F. van de Vijver, P. Schmitz, & P. Boski (Eds.), Selected papers from the 12th International Conference of the Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp.278-293). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
44.
Singelis, T. M., & Sharkey, W. F. (1995). Culture, self-construal, and embarrassability. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 622-644.
45.
Skalkidou, A. (2000). Parental family variables and likelihood of divorce. Soz Praventivmed, 45, 95-101.
46.
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Version 9.0) [Computer software]. (1998). Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
47.
Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Whitton, S. W. (2002). Communication, conflict, and commitment: Insights on the foundations of relationship success from a national survey. Family Process, 41, 659-675.
48.
Sullivan, K. T. (2001). Understanding the relationship between religiosity and marriage: An investigation of the immediate and longitudinal effects of religiosity on newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 610-626.
49.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper-Row.
50.
Taylor, C. (1985). Human agency and language: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
Taylor, C. (1991). The dialogical self. In J. Bohman, D. Hiley, & R. Schusterman (Eds.), The interpretive turn (pp. 304-314). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
53.
Teachman, J. D. (2002). Stability across cohorts in divorce risk factors. Demography, 39, 331-351.
54.
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Intercultural conflict styles: A face-negotiation theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 213-233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55.
Waldron, I., Weiss, C. C., & Hughes, M. E. (1997). Marital status effects on health: Are there differences between never married women and divorced and separated women? Social Science and Medicine, 45, 1387-1397.
56.
Wojtkiewicz, R. A., McLanahan, S. S., & Garfinkel, I. (1990). The growth of families headed by women: 1950-1980. Demography, 27, 19-30.
57.
Wu, Z., & Penning, M. J. (1997). Marital instability after midlife. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 459-478.
58.
Zilberman, M. L., Hochgraf, P. B., Brasiliano, S., & Milharcic, S. I. (2001). Drug dependent women: Demographics and clinical characteristics in a Brazilian sample. Substance Use & Misuse, 36, 1095-1111.
