The post-conflict trajectory of South Sudan has been characterised by persistent governance challenges, despite numerous peace agreements. This study examines governance challenges following the 2018 Revitalised Agreement (R-ARCSS). The concept of elite-managed fragmentation is introduced, positing that ruling elites deliberately maintain institutional weakness to preserve their power. Using qualitative content analysis of peace agreements, academic literature, and local and international reports, the study asks, ‘Why do governance challenges persist despite formal peace deals?’ It finds that the R-ARCSS, though framed as inclusive, overlooks structural issues such as institutional fragility and ethnic divisions, limiting its effectiveness.
AdegbamiAUcheCIN (2015) Ethnicity and ethnic politics: an impediment to political development in Nigeria. Public Administration Research4(1): 59–67. DOI: 10.5539/par.v4n1p59
2.
AdulaNG (2018) IGAD’s peace building effort in South Sudan: challenges and prospects. International Journal of Political Science and Development6(3): 85–89.
3.
AfriyieFAJianJAppiahKY (2020) Comprehensive analysis of South Sudan conflict: determinants and repercussions. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs6(1): 33–47.
4.
AgwandaBAsalUY (2020) State fragility and post-conflict state-building: an analysis of South Sudan conflict (2013-2019). Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi9(1): 125–146. DOI: 10.28956/gbd.736103
5.
AjideKBAlimiOYAsonguSA (2019) Ethnic diversity and inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: do institutions reduce the noise?Social Indicators Research145(3): 1033–1062. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-019-02122-y
6.
AkechJGMadingGMGengPG (2022) Amending the South Sudan’s revitalized peace agreement: the implications of the extension and its roadmap. SUDD Institute. Available at: www.suddinstitute.org
7.
AspinallE (2018) Elite bargains and political deals project: Indonesia (Aceh) case study.
BaytiyehH (2019) Lebanon’s power-sharing system and the rise of sectarianism. Peace Review31(2): 223–230. DOI: 10.1080/10402659.2019.1667576
11.
BellCBadanjakS (2019) Introducing PA-X: a new peace agreement database and dataset. Journal of Peace Research56(3): 452–466. DOI: 10.1177/0022343318819123
12.
BengtssonM (2016) How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. Nursingplus Open2: 8–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
13.
BlackingsMJ (2018) Why peace fails: the case of South Sudan’s agreement on the resolution of the conflict in South Sudan. Friedrich-ebert-stiftung (FES) Africa Security Policy Network.
14.
BTI (2024) Bertelsmann Stiftung BTI 2024 Country Report – South Sudan. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. Available at: https://www.bti-project.org
15.
ChiguduD (2019) Demystifying the root causes of conflict in old ‘Greater’ Sudan: ethnicity and tribalism?Journal of Developing Societies.
16.
CholJ (2022) State dysfunctionality: the role of political elites in South Sudanese state-crafting and collapse. Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives7(1): 16–31. DOI: 10.55190/JDHR9972
17.
DagherR (2018) Legitimacy and post-conflict state-building: the undervalued role of performance legitimacy. Conflict Security & Development18(2): 85–111. DOI: 10.1080/14678802.2018.1447860
18.
De BruinE (2024) Power sharing and coups d’état in postconflict settings: evidence from Burundi and Guinea-Bissau. Armed Forces & Society50(1): 274–293. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X221108370
19.
De SimoneS (2018) Playing the ‘fragile state’ card: the SPLM and state extraversion in South Sudan. The Journal of Modern African Studies56(3): 395–420. DOI: 10.1017/S0022278X18000290
20.
De WaalA (2014) When kleptocracy becomes insolvent: Brute causes of the civil war in South Sudan. African Affairs113(452): 347–369.
21.
De’NyokME (2025) The impacts of state instability on services delivery in post-conflict South Sudan. Open Journal of Political Science15(1): 146–187. DOI: 10.4236/ojps.2025.151011
22.
FrancisDJ (2016): Timing and sequencing of post-conflict reconstruction and peacebuilding efforts in South Sudan. In: LangerABrownGK (eds) Building Sustainable Peace. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757276.003.0016
23.
FukuyamaF (2016) Governance: what do we know, and how do we know it?Annual Review of Political Science19(1): 89–105. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044240
GaiPG (2025) Revitalized agreement on the resolution of conflict in South Sudan: reflecting success, failure, and potential consequences. Journal of Humanities and Social Science30(2): 17–29.
26.
GarangKË (2019) Political ideology and organisational espousal: a political-historical analysis of Dr. John Garang De Mabior’s ‘New Sudan Vision’. Modern Africa: Politics History and Society7(2): 89–122. DOI: 10.26806/modafr.v7i2.258
27.
HamidzadaHPonzioR (2019) Central Asia’s growing role in building peace and regional connectivity with Afghanistan. Special Report No. 453, United States Institute of Peace.
IdowuASOladitiAAAdenugaAE (2019) Ethnicity, inequality and the tragedy of African development: a comparative case study of Nigeria and the South Sudan. Journal of Globalization Studies1(10): 111–129. DOI: 10.30884/jogs/2019.01.08
JokJM (2015) The paradox of peace in Sudan and South Sudan: why political settlements failed to endure. Inclusive Political Settlements Papers, no. 15. Berghof Foundation. Available at: www.berghof-foundation.org
34.
JundiS (2023) The impact of institutional capacity on public performance in Upper Nile State South Sudan. International Journal of Leadership and Governance3(2): 80–93. DOI: 10.47604/ijlg.2168
35.
JustinPHVerkorenW (2022) Hybrid governance in South Sudan: the negotiated state in practice. Peacebuilding10(1): 17–36. DOI: 10.1080/21647259.2021.1917186
36.
JustinoP (2019) Governance interventions in conflict-affected countries. The Journal of Development Studies55(7): 1364–1378. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2018.1487053
37.
KirandaYKampMMugishaMB, et al (2016) Conflict and state formation in South Sudan: the logic of oil revenues in influencing the dynamics of elite bargains. On Perspectives of African Democracy & Development1(1): 30–40.
38.
KonM (2015) Institutional development, governance, and ethnic politics in South Sudan. Journal of Global Economics3(2): 1–6. DOI: 10.4172/2375-4389.1000147
39.
KoosCGutschkeT (2014) South Sudan’s newest war: when two old men divide a nation. German Institute of Global and Area Studies (GIGA). Available at: www.giga-hamburg.de/giga-focus
40.
KrasniqiBBranchD (2018) Institutions and firm growth in a transitional and post-conflict economy of Kosovo. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies12(2): 187–204. DOI: 10.1108/JEEE-05-2017-0034
41.
KulangTOgbonnaCKhamalwaW (2020) South Sudan: ethnicity and statehood. Perception and the Way Forward. Conflict Studies Quarterly(31): 41–55. DOI: 10.24193/csq.31.3
42.
KuolLBD (2020) South Sudan: the elusive quest for a resilient social contract?Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding14(1): 64–83. DOI: 10.1080/17502977.2019.1627692
43.
McEvoyJAboultaifEW (2022) Power-sharing challenges: from weak adoptability to dysfunction in Iraq. Ethnopolitics21(3): 238–257. DOI: 10.1080/17449057.2020.1739363
44.
MagaraIPospisilJ (2025) Beyond liberal peace? The IGAD-led peace mediation in South Sudan. Preprint. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5108678
45.
MakoS (2023) Divided opposition, fragmented statebuilding: elite bargaining in pre- and post-2003 Iraq. International Peacekeeping30(5): 585–610. DOI: 10.1080/13533312.2023.2221854
46.
MaphasaT (2020) Finding peace in uncertain times: South Sudan and the revitalised peace process. South African Institute of International Affairs. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep27019
47.
MariottiC (2020) ‘Elite Theory’. In: HarrisPBitontiAFleisherCS, et al (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs. New York: Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_67-1.
48.
MayaiATTiitmamerN (2020) The return to ten states in South Sudan: does it restore peace?SUDD Institute. Available at: www.suddinstitute.org
49.
MkandawireT (2015) Neopatrimonialism and the political economy of economic performance in Africa: critical reflections. World Politics67(3): 563–612. DOI: 10.1017/S004388711500009X
50.
MotiUG (2019) Neopatrimonialism as a functional threat to good governance and development in Africa. American Research Journal of Humanities & Social Science2(10): 8–28.
51.
MutasaCVirkK (2017) Building peace in South Sudan: progress, problems, and prospects. Centre for Conflict Resolution. Available at: http://www.jstor.com/stable/resrep05143.6
52.
NathanL (2020) The real deal? The post-conflict constitution as a peace agreement. Third World Quarterly41(9): 1556–1574. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2020.1771177
53.
OpiyoKO (2024) Evaluating the effectiveness of United Nations peace-building strategies in South Sudan. African Quarterly Social Science Review1(3): 53–66. DOI: 10.51867/AQSSR.1.3.5
54.
PaffenholzT (2021) Perpetual peacebuilding: a new paradigm to move beyond the linearity of liberal peacebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding15(3): 367–385. DOI: 10.1080/17502977.2021.1925423
55.
RettbergA (2020) Peace-making amidst an unfinished social contract: the case of Colombia. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding14(1): 84–100. DOI: 10.1080/17502977.2019.1619655
56.
RolandsenØH (2015) Another civil war in South Sudan: the failure of guerrilla government?Journal of Eastern African Studies9(1): 163–174. DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2014.993210
57.
RolandsenØHKindersleyN (2017) South Sudan: a political economy analysis. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Available at: http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.2.31330.38087
58.
ShabbirTDinSSUKhanA, et al (2021) Power sharing between peace and conflict times: a case study of Liberia. Pinisi Discretion Review5(1): 135–142.
59.
SudanTribune (2014) South Sudan: a power struggle and implications for state and nation building. Sudan Tribune, 10February. Available at: https://sudantribune.com/article48784/
60.
TheronS (2020) Power and influence in post-secession South Sudan: a leadership perspective on nation-building. African Security Review29(1): 58–81. DOI: 10.1080/10246029.2020.1748672
Von SoestC (2022) Neopatrimonialism: A Critical Assessment. In: HoutWHutchisonJ (eds) Handbook on Governance and Development. Edward Elgar Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789908756.00019.
65.
WightP (2017) South Sudan and the four dimensions of power-sharing: political, territorial, military, and economic. African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review7(2): 1–35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2979/africonfpeacrevi.7.2.01
66.
World Bank Group (2017) Building sustainable public sector capacity in a challenging context. World Bank. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1596/26509
67.
YigzawGS (2019) Challenges of democratization in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan10(2): 84–108. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.10299
68.
ZambakariC (2015) Sudan and South Sudan: identity, citizenship, and democracy in plural societies. Citizenship Studies19(1): 69–82.
