The government procurement of live performances is an innovative practice in China. Based on the data of a first-hand questionnaire survey (N = 2777) in China, econometric methods such as the zero-inflated negative binomial model are used for evaluation. The results indicate that the low-income, the low-education, and the elderly constitute the essential attendees of performances provided through government procurement, among which people with low income demonstrate higher satisfaction levels. This to some extent reflects that the government procurement of performances effectively expands artistic exposure, especially among vulnerable groups. Meanwhile, challenges including insiders’ advantages and the supply-demand mismatch have been identified. Overall, Chinese practice demonstrates that the government procurement of performances is a policy worthy of further exploration and promotion, and may offer enlightenment for countries worldwide regarding performing arts subsidies.
AndreasenARBelkRW (1980) Predictors of attendance at the performing arts. Journal of Consumer Research7(2): 112–120.
2.
BaumolWJ (1947) Notes on the theory of government procurement. Economica14(53): 1–18.
3.
BhansingPVLeendersMAAMWijnbergNM (2017) Scheduled audience capacity for performing arts companies: the role of product innovativeness and organizational. International Journal of Arts Management20(1): 63–77.
4.
BignéJEMattilaASAndreuL (2008) The impact of experiential consumption cognitions and emotions on behavioral intentions. Journal of Services Marketing22(4): 303–315.
5.
BoernerSMoserVJobstJ (2011) Evaluating cultural industries: investigating visitors’ satisfaction in theatres. The Service Industries Journal31(6): 877–895.
6.
BorgonoviF (2004) Performing arts attendance: an economic approach. Applied Economics36(17): 1871–1885.
7.
BourdieuP (1973) Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In: BrownR (ed.) Knowledge, Education and Cultural Change: Papers in the Sociology of Education. London: Tavistock, pp. 71–112.
8.
BrooksAC (2006) Chapter 15 nonprofit firms in the performing arts. In: GinsburgVAThrosbyD (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 473–506.
9.
BrowneNWCudeckR (1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research21(2): 230–258.
10.
ChenGTangP (2021) Similar but special: an econometric analysis of live performing arts attendance in mainland China. Journal of Cultural Economics45(3): 459–490.
11.
ColeMTDaviesRBKaplanT (2017) Protection in government procurement auctions. Journal of International Economics106: 134–142.
12.
CourtyPZhangF (2018) Cultural participation in major Chinese cities. Journal of Cultural Economics42(4): 543–592.
13.
CuadradoMMollàA (2000) Grouping performing arts consumers according to attendance goals. International Journal of Arts Management2(3): 54–60.
14.
De la VegaPSuarez-FernándezSBoto-GarcíaD, et al. (2020) Playing a play: online and live performing arts consumers profiles and the role of supply constraints. Journal of Cultural Economics44(3): 425–450.
15.
FazioliRFilippiniM (1997) Cost structure and product mix of local public theatres. Journal of Cultural Economics21(1): 77–86.
16.
ForbesR (1929) Government Purchasing. New York: Happer & Brothers Publishers.
17.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
18.
ForrestDGrimeKWoodsR (2000) Is it worth subsidising regional repertory theatre?Oxford Economic Papers52(2): 381–397.
19.
GlobermanSBookSH (1976) Formulating cost and output policies in the performing arts. Canadian Public Policy2(1): 33–41.
20.
HansmannH (1981) Nonprofit enterprise in the performing arts. Bell Journal of Economics12(2): 341–361.
21.
HeilbrunJGrayCM (2001) The Economics of Art and Culture, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HolbrookMBSchindlerRM (1994) Age, sex, and attitude toward the past as predictors of consumers’ aesthetic tastes for cultural products. Journal of Marketing Research31(3): 412–422.
23.
HuangGLiDNgST, et al. (2023) A methodology for assessing supply-demand matching of smart government services from citizens’ perspective: a case study in Nanjing, China. Habitat International138: 102880.
24.
HuangGLiDYuL, et al. (2022) Factors affecting sustainability of smart city services in China: from the perspective of citizens’ sense of gain. Habitat International128: 102645.
25.
HumeMMortGS (2008) Satisfaction in performing arts: the role of value?European Journal of Marketing42(3/4): 311–326.
26.
HumeMMortGS (2010) The consequence of appraisal emotion, service quality, perceived value and customer satisfaction on repurchase intent in the performing arts. Journal of Services Marketing24(2): 170–182.
27.
HumeMMortGSLieschPW, et al. (2006) Understanding service experience in non-profit performing arts: implications for operations and service management. Journal of Operations Management24(4): 304–324.
28.
JobstJBoernerS (2011) Understanding customer satisfaction in opera: first steps toward a model. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing16(1): 50–69.
29.
KeaneM (2000) Cultural policy in China: emerging research agendas. International Journal of Cultural Policy6(2): 243–258.
30.
KeaneMZhaoEJ (2014) The reform of the cultural system: culture, creativity and innovation in China. In: LeeHK (ed.) Cultural Policies in East Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 155–173.
31.
KimMPandeySPandeySK (2018) Why do nonprofit performing arts organizations offer free public access?Public Administration Review78(1): 139–150.
32.
KirchnerTAMarkowskiEPFordJB (2007) Relationships among levels of government support, marketing activities, and financial health of nonprofit performing arts organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing12(2): 95–116.
33.
KrebsSPommerehneWW (1995) Politico-economic interactions of German public performing arts institutions. Journal of Cultural Economics19(1): 17–32.
34.
KushnerRKingAE (1994) Performing arts as a club good: evidence from a nonprofit organization. Journal of Cultural Economics18(1): 15–28.
35.
LastA-KWetzelH (2011) Baumol’s cost disease, efficiency, and productivity in the performing arts: an analysis of German public theaters. Journal of Cultural Economics35(3): 185–201.
36.
LazzaroEFrateschiC (2017) Couples’ arts participation: assessing individual and joint time use. Journal of Cultural Economics41(1): 47–69.
37.
LuksetichWALangeMD (1995) A simultaneous model of nonprofit symphony orchestra behavior. Journal of Cultural Economics19(1): 49–68.
38.
MartinezCEuzébyFLallementJ (2018) The importance of the venue in an information search: online ticket purchase in the performing arts. International Journal of Arts Management20(3): 60–74.
39.
McCarthyKFJinnettK (2001) A New Framework for Building Participation in the Arts. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
40.
Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the People’s Republic of China (2021) The Yearbook of China Culture, Relics and Tourism Statistics 2021. Peking: National Library of China Publishing House.
41.
MuñizCRodríguezPSuárezMJ (2014) Sports and cultural habits by gender: an application using count data models. Economic Modelling36(1): 288–297.
42.
NeupaneASoarJVaidyaK (2014) An empirical evaluation of the potential of public e-procurement to reduce corruption. Australasian Journal of Information Systems18(2): 21–44.
43.
OliverRL (2010) Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: Routledge.
44.
PastoryP (2019) Inter-governmental relations and procurement non-compliance in African local government systems. Journal of Public Procurement19(4): 277–294.
45.
PeacockAT (1994) Welfare economics and public subsidies to the arts. Journal of Cultural Economics18(2): 151–161.
46.
PhilipKJoanneS (1997) Standing Room Only: Strategies for Marketing the Performing Arts. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
47.
RickardSJKonoDY (2014) Think globally, buy locally: international agreements and government procurement. The Review of International Organizations9(3): 333–352.
48.
RonchiSBrunAGoliniR, et al. (2010) What is the value of an IT e-procurement system?Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management16(2): 131–140.
49.
SeamanBA (2005) Attendance and Public Participation in the Performing Arts: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series No. 06–25, Georgia State University.
50.
SnowballJDAntrobusGG (2001) Measuring the value of the arts to society: the importance of the value of externalities for lower income and education groups in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics69(4): 752–766.
51.
StaplesWDalrympleJ (2016) Construction procurement and state government strategy: aligned or disconnected?Australian Journal of Public Administration75(2): 222–235.
52.
TangPChenGLinJ (2023) Employee loyalty in the process of market-oriented reform: evidence from Chinese State-Owned Performing Arts Organizations. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society53(5): 328–347.
53.
Thomas MoreS (2007) The impact of government funding on private contributions to nonprofit performing arts organizations. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics78(1): 137–160.
54.
ThrosbyCDWithersGA (1979) The Economics of the Performing Arts. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
55.
ThrosbyD (1994) The production and consumption of the arts: a view of cultural economics. Journal of Economic Literature32(1): 1–29.
56.
TraubSMissongM (2005) On the public provision of the performing arts. Regional Science and Urban Economics35(6): 862–882.
57.
WangXTangP (2023) Does conspicuous tourism consumption preference enhance borrowing intention of people without financial freedom? Empirical evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research28(6): 539–555.
58.
WenW-JChengT-C (2013) Performing arts attendance in Taiwan: who and how often?Journal of Cultural Economics37(2): 309–325.
59.
WestEG (1987) Nonprofit versus profit firms in the performing arts. Journal of Cultural Economics11(2): 37–47.
60.
WooldridgeJM (2020) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 7th Edition. Boston: Cengage Learning.
61.
WuJJiangKYuanC (2020) Market-oriented reforms, economic efficiency and commercial performing arts in China. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society50(1): 33–51.
