The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine provides us with evidence of the importance of cyberweapons in modern warfare. Cyberweapons are thickening the fog of war, creating new avenues for inter-state competition. As India and Pakistan have been engaged in a rivalry for the past 75 years, cyberweapons can play an important role in the future of this enmity. This research signifies the ramifications of cyberweapons on strategic stability between two nuclear-armed states. Cyberweapons are exacerbating risks to nuclear weapons that can lead to both advertent and inadvertent nuclear escalation. The question addressed in this paper is Why do Pakistan and India need to manage their rivalry in the domain of cyberwarfare? The methodology used for this research is qualitative with both primary and secondary data sources. This research has utilized a case study research design by taking India-Pakistan relations as the case. There are two potential pathways for India and Pakistan to manage their rivalry in the cyber domain. These are cyber-deterrence and cyber-CBMs. However, shortcomings are attached to both pathways, and only by taking them together can they complement each other and work as risk-reduction measures. Both these pathways are explained, and a way forward is provided that can be undertaken by India and Pakistan to reduce the risks posed in the cyber domain.
BaeznerM (2018) Regional rivalry between India-Pakistan: Tit-for-tat in cyberspace. In CSS Cyberdefense Hotspot Analyses (Issue 10) [Report]. ETH Zurich.
GillDM (2020) Beyond offensive realism: India’s rise, U.S. accommodation. Asian Studies56(2): 150–157.
18.
GoodmanW (2010) Cyber deterrence: Tougher in theory than in practice?Strategic Studies Quarterly4(3): 102–135.
19.
HealeyJMalleryJCJordanKT, et al (2014) Confidence-Building Measures in Cyberspace. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council, pp. 1–28.
20.
JamesP (2022) Defensive realism. In: JamesP (ed.), Realism and International Relations: A Graphic Turn Toward Scientific Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 448.
21.
JervisR (1978) Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics30(2): 167–214.
22.
KaniaEB (2016) Cyber deterrence in times of cyber anarchy—Evaluating the divergences in U.S. and Chinese strategic thinking. In: 2016 International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon U.S.), Washington, DC, pp. 1–17.
KhanAM (2024) Cyberwarfare and new pathways of nuclear escalation: implications for South Asia. Journal of Security & Strategic Analyses10(2): 135–149. https://doi.org/10.57160/jssa/0010.02.0322
NyeJSJr (2017) Deterrence and dissuasion in cyberspace. International Security41(3): 44–71.
36.
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (2013) Permanent Council Decision No. 1106. Available at: https://www.osce.org/pc/109168 (accessed 13 March 2023).
PerlrothN (2021) This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race. 1st ed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
40.
PurpuraPP (2013) 16—Protecting Critical Infrastructure. In PurpuraPP (ed.) Security and Loss Prevention. 6th ed.New York: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 475–528.
41.
RadanlievP (2024) Digital security by design. Security Journal37(4): 1640–1679.
42.
RadanlievPDe RoureDMapleC, et al (2022) Super-forecasting the ‘technological singularity’ risks from artificial intelligence. Evolving Systems13(5): 747–757.
SoesantoSSmeetsM (2021) Cyber deterrence: The past, present, and future. In OsingaFSweijsT (eds.) NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies 2020: Deterrence in the 21st Century—Insights from Theory and Practice. The Hague, Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp. 385–400.
54.
StankovicM (2023) GENEVA MANUAL – On responsible behaviour in cyberspace. Geneva Dialogue. Available at: https://genevadialogue.ch/geneva-manual/ (accessed 07 June 2024).
55.
StoutlandPOPitts-KieferSMonizEJ, et al (2018) Understanding the cyber threat to nuclear weapons and related systems. In: Nuclear Weapons in the New Cyber Age. Washington, DC: Nuclear Threat Initiative, pp. 9–20. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep19983.6 (accessed 17 July 2023).
56.
Surya Valliappan Krishna (2022) Bordering on peace: Evaluating the impact of the India-Pakistan ceasefire. Carnegie India, 24February. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.orgundefined?lang=en (accessed 03 June 2023).
