The traditional birth attendants called Dais occupied a significant role in the birthing space of India since antiquity. This article examines the influence of women missionaries on the social roles of Dais in the colonial era. The thesis argues that women missionaries played a significant role in the marginalization of Dais from the late-19th to early 20th-century India. The study discovered that missionaries deploy the rhetoric of poor hygiene to castigate their social roles. Focusing on women missionaries and Dais affords us a rare privilege to gauge the intricate interplay between medicine and gender in colonial medicine.
AbudigieriH (2016) Gender and the Making of Modern Medicine in Colonial Egypt. Routledge: London, p.158.
2.
AdamsKFaulkheadSStandfieldR, et al (2017) Challenging the colonization of birth: Koori women’s birthing knowledge and practice. Women and Birth31: 81–88.
3.
ArnoldD (2000) Science, Technology and Medicine in Colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.87.
4.
BalfourMYoungR (1929) The Work of Medical Women in India. Bombay: Oxford University Press.
5.
BrouwerR (1990) New Women for God: Canadian Presbyterian Women and India Missions, 1876- 1914. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press, p.115.
6.
BurtonA (1996) Contesting the Zenana: The mission to make “lady doctors for India” 1874-1885. Journal of British Studies35: 368–397.
7.
ChaparroCNeufeldLMAlavezGT, et al (2006) Effects on the timing of umbilical cord clamping on iron status in Mexican infants: Randomized clinical trial. The Lancet367: 1997–2004.
8.
ChawlaJ (1994) Childbearing and culture: Women-centered revisioning of the traditional midwife: The Dai as ritual practitioners. Indian Journal of Gender Studies1(2): 261–263.
9.
ElmslieW (1873) On female medical missions for India. The Female Medical Evangelist1(5): 173.
10.
EngelD (1996) Beyond Purdah? Women in Bengal 1890-1939. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
11.
EnkinMKeirseMNeilsonJ, et al (2000) A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. 3rd ed.London: Oxford University Press.
12.
FitzgeraldR (1929) A peculiar and exceptional measure: The call for women medical missionaries for India in the later nineteenth century. In: BickersRASetonR (eds) Missionary Encounters: Sources and Issues. London: Curzon Press, p.185.
13.
ForbesG (1994) Managing midwifery in India. In: EngelsDMarksS (eds) Contesting Colonial Hegemony: State and Society in Africa and India. London: German Historical Institute London, pp.152–174.
14.
ForbesG (2005) Women in Colonial India: Essays on Politics, Medicine and Historiography. New Delhi, India: Chronicle Books, p.86.
15.
FrenchW (1946) The Gospel in India. London: Carey Place, p.80.
16.
GideonM (1962) A baby is born in the Punjab. American Anthropologist64: 1220–1234.
17.
GuhaA (2016) The “Masculine” female: The rise of female doctors in Colonial India, C.1870-1940. Social Scientist44(5–6): 49–64.
18.
GuhaS (1998) From Dias to doctors: The medicalization of childbirth in Colonial India by Supriya Guha. In: LingamL (ed.) Understanding Womens Health Issues: A Reader. New Delhi, India: Kali for Women, p.228.
19.
GuptaJNikodermC (2000) Maternal posture in labor. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology92(2): 273–277.
20.
HogganF (1885) Medical work for women in India part 1. Englishwoman’s Review, 15April, p.152.
21.
IrelandSMontgomery-AndersenRGeraghtyS, et al (2019) Indigenous Doulas: A literature review exploring their role and practice in western maternity care. Midwifery75: 52–58.
22.
JiangHQianXChenL, et al (2016) Towards universal access to skilled birth attendance: The process of transforming the role of traditional birth attendants in Rural China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth16: 58.
23.
KakarD (1980) Dais: Traditional Birth Attendants in Village India. New Delhi, India: New Asian.
24.
LalM (1994) The politics of gender and medicine in Colonial India: The countess of Dufferin’s Fund, 1855–1888. BHM68: 30.
25.
LefeberYVoorhoeveH (2000) Indigenous Customs in Childbirths and Child Care. Gorinchem; Geneva: Van Gorcum; WHO.
26.
McClintockA (1995) Imperial Leather: Race, Gender and Sexuality in the Colonial Context. New York: Routledge.
27.
MalhotraA (2003) Of Dais and midwives: Middle class intervention in the management of women’s reproductive health—A study from Colonial Punjab. Indian Journal of Gender Studies10(2): 230–259.
28.
MatthewsZRamakrishnaJMahendraS, et al (2005) Birth rights and rituals in rural South India: Care seeking in the intrapartum period. Journal of Biosocial Science37: 385–411.
29.
OhajaMMurphy-LawlessJDunleaM (2020) Midwives’ views of Traditional Birth Attendants within formal healthcare in Nigeria. Women and Birth33(2): e111–e116.
RadhikaMBalasubramanianV (1990) Mother and Child Care in Traditional Medicine (Parts 1, 2), LSPSS Monograph Series 3, 4. Coimbatore, India: LSPSS.
32.
RamKJollyM (2001) Modernity and the midwife: Contestation over subaltern figure, South India. In: ConnorLHSamuelG (eds) Healing Power and Modernity: Traditional Medicine, Shamanism and Science in Asian Societies. Westport, CT: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp.64–84.
33.
RamusackB (2007) Women’s hospitals and midwives in Mysore, 1870-1930: Princely or colonial medicine. In: ErnstWPatiB (eds) India’s Princely States: Peoples, Princes and Colonialism. London: Routledge, pp.172–189.
34.
RobertsJHansonL (2007) Best practices in second stage labor care: Maternal bearing down and positioning. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health52(3): 238–245.
35.
RoyBQadeerISadgopalM, et al (2021) Giving birth at home in resource scarce regions in India: An argument for making women-centric approach of the traditional dais sustainable. In: GutschowKDavis-FloydRDavissBA (eds) Sustainable Birth in Disruptive Times. Cham: Springer Nature, pp.217–232.
36.
RozarioSSamuelG (eds) (2002) The Daughters of Hariti: Childbirth and Female Healers in South and Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.
37.
SadgopalM (2009) Can maternity services open up to the indigenous traditions of midwifery?Economic and Political Weekly44(16): 52–59.
38.
SakeahEMcCloskeyLBernsteinJ, et al (2014) Can community health officer- midwives effectively integrate skilled birth attendance in the community-based health planning and services program in rural Ghana?Reproductive Health11: 90.
39.
SamanthaA (2016) Physicians, forceps and childbirths: Technological intervention in reproductive health in colonial Bengal.In: BalaP (ed.) Medicine and Colonialism: Historical Perspectives in India and South Africa. London: Routledge, p.107.
40.
SarmientoIParedes-SolísSDionA, et al (2021) Maternal Health and Indigenous traditional midwives in Southern Mexico: Contextualization of a scoping review. BMJ Open11(12): e054542.
41.
ShimpukuYMadeniFEShimodaK, et al (2021) Perceived differences on the role of traditional birth attendants in rural Tanzania: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth21(1): 137.
42.
SialubanjeCMassarKHamerDH, et al (2015) Reasons for home delivery and use of traditional birth attendants in rural Zambia: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth15: 216.
43.
SomanK (2013) Traditional midwives in social reproduction: Changing landscape in 20th century Bengal. India Journal of Gender Studies20(2): 213–234.
44.
TuyisengeGHategekaCLuginaahI, et al (2020) “I cannot say no when a pregnant woman needs my support to get to the health centre”: Involvement of community health workers in Rwanda’s maternal health. BMC Health Services Research20: 524.
45.
WallsA (1982) The heavy artillery of the missionary army: The domestic importance of the nineteenth-century medical missionary.In: ShielsWJ (ed.) The Church and Healing. Ecclesiastical History Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.287–290.
46.
WHO (1997) Practices are no longer recommended for the management of labor. Care in Normal Birth: Report of a Technical Working Group, World Health Organization 24(2): 121–123.
WilliamsC (1982) Healing and evangelism: The place of medicine in later Victorian protestant missionary thinking. In: ShielsWJ (ed.) The Church and Healing. Ecclesiastical History Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.271–285.
