This paper problematizes nativeness of a Pakistani anthropologist originating from reflection on meanings of the term ‘native,’ against certain other key determinants of anthropological fieldwork like, ‘field’, ‘self’ and ‘representation in writing’. Methodologically, the paper contextualizes self of a Punjabi anthropologist at his native village while comparing historically enacted self at another Punjabi village where an American anthropologist did fieldwork seven decades earlier. Therefore, moving beyond the singular meaning coming from the term ‘native’, I propose that the term carries the self of a native anthropologist both in the forms of peril and privilege.
Abu-LughodL (1991) Writing against culture. In: Fox RG (ed.) Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. 1st ed. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press, pp. 137–162.
2.
AdamsTEJonesSHEllisC (2015) Autoethnography: Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
AlviA (2001) The category of the person in rural Punjab. Social Anthropology9(1): 45–63.
4.
AppaduraiA (1988) Putting hierarchy in its place. Cultural Anthropology3(1): 36–49.
5.
ArifY (2016) Anthropologizing the world and worlding the anthropologist. American Anthropologist118(4): 848–851.
6.
AsadT (1973) Anthropology & the Colonial Encounter. London: Ithaca Press.
7.
AstutiR (2017) On keeping up the tension between fieldwork and ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory7(1): 9–14. DOI: 10.14318/ha.
8.
BarnardA (2004) History and Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ChaudharyMA (2006) Rhineland ethnography and Pakistani reflexivity. Zeitschrift Für Ethnologie131(1): 1–26.
10.
ChaudharyA (2011) Doing reflexive research in a ‘native’ field. Pakistan Journal of History and Culture XXXII(1): 113–129.
11.
CliffordJ (1986) Introduction: Partial truths. In: CliffordJMarcusGE (eds) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 1–26.
12.
Dullo (2016) Seriously enough? Describing or analysing the Native(s)’s point of view. In: CarrierJG (ed) After the Crisis: Anthropological Thought, Neoliberalism and the Aftermath. London: Routledge, pp. 133–153.
13.
DumontL (1986) Essays on Individualism: Modern Ideology in Anthropological Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
EglarZ (1960) A Punjabi Village in Pakistan. Second Printing edition. NY/Lon: Columbia University Press.
15.
EglarZ (2010) A Punjabi Village in Pakistan: Perspectives on Community, Land, and Economy. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
16.
EriksenTH (2001) Small Places, Large Issues: An Introduction to Social and Cultural Anthropology. London: Pluto Press.
17.
GeertzC (1988) Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
GosdenC (1999) Anthropology and Archaeology: A Changing Relationship. London: Routledge.
19.
GouletJ-G (1998) Ways of Knowing. Experience, Knowledge and Power among the Dene Tha. Lincoln: Nebraska University Press.
20.
GuptaAFergusonJ (1997) Discipline and Practice: ‘The Field’ as site, method and location in anthropology. In: GuptaAFergusonJ (eds) Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of a field science. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 1–46.
21.
IngoldT (1996) 1988 Debate social anthropology is a generalizing science or it is nothing: Introduction. In: IngoldT (ed.) Key Debates in Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp.13–44.
22.
IngoldT (2017) Anthropology contra ethnography. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory7(1): 21–26. DOI: 10.14318/hau7.1.005.
23.
JamesDRReddingK (2005) Theories of Race and the State. In: JanoksiTAlfortRRHicksAM, et al (eds) The Handbook of Political Sociology: States, Civil Societies, and Globalization. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–200.
24.
JonesDJ (1995) Anthropology and the oppressed: A reflection on ‘Native’ anthropology. Special Issue: Insider Anthropology16(1): 58–70.
LewisD (1973) Anthropology and colonialism. Current Anthropology14(5): 581–602.
27.
LyonSM (2004) An Anthropological Analysis of Local Politics and Patronage in a Pakistani Village. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.
28.
Motzafi-HallerP (1997) Writing Birthright: On native anthropologists and the politics of representation. In: Reed-DanahayDE (eds) Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the Self and the Social. Oxford: Berg, pp. 195–222.
29.
MughalMAZ (2015) Being and becoming native: A methodological enquiry into doing anthropology at home. Anthropological Notebooks21(1): 121–132.
30.
NarayanK (1993) How native Is a ‘Native’ anthropologist?American Anthropologist95(3): 671–686.
31.
QadarA (2021) Reinventing Eglar’s Punjabi village: Contemporary role of land ownership for biradery system and social status at Mohla in Gujrat, Pakistan. South Asian Journal of Contemporary Social Sciences4(1): 4–15.
32.
QadarAWaheedA (2023) Traditional hierarchies of Zamindars and Kammis in Pakistani Punjab: Contemporary contests through Vartan Bhanji. South Asia Research43(2): 276–291.
33.
ReesT (2008) Introduction: Today, what is anthropology?” In: PaulRMarcusGEFaubionJD, et al, (eds) Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 1–12.
34.
SaidEW (1989) Representing the colonized: Anthropology’s interlocutors. Critical Inquiry15(2): 205–225.
35.
SökefeldM (1999) Debating self, identity, and culture in anthropology. Current Anthropology40(4): 417–448.
36.
SrinivasMN (2002) Collected Essays. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
37.
StahlAB (2004) Making History in Banda: Anthropological Visions of Africa’s Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
ThomasN (1994) Colonialism’s Culture. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
