From Social Solidarity to Individual Effort: The Disintegration of Social Solidarity After the Earthquakes of 6 February 2023 in Turkey

Abstract

This study explores changes in social solidarity after the 6 February 2023, earthquakes in Turkey, focusing on the most affected Turkish province, Hatay. Through semi-structured interviews with 30 earthquake survivors (19 women, 11 men) residing in a temporary container city, the research found that strong social solidarity networks initially accelerated victims’ psychosocial and economic recovery. However, over time, these networks weakened, and individual efforts replaced collective action, slowing the recovery process. Contributing factors included reduced media coverage, growing public insensitivity, and systemic issues like aid distribution and reserve area policies, all of which hindered long-term solidarity.

Keywords

Social solidarity disintegration individual effort media systemic problems

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Açıkalın

(2018) Türkiye’ye ilişkin sosyal boyutlu deprem yazınına eleştirel bir bakış. Resilience 2(2): 85–104.

Albris

(2023) ‘Our society works’: disaster solidarity and models of social life in the Elbe River Valley. Ethnos. Epub ahead of print 25 October. DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2023.2274294.

Aldrich

(2012) Social capital: its role in post-disaster recovery. In: Aldrich

(ed.) Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, pp.1–23.

Aldrich

Crook

(2008) Strong civil society as a double-edged sword: siting trailers in post-Katrina New Orleans. Political Research Quarterly 61(3): 379–389.

Aldrich

Meyer

(2015) Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist 59(2): 254–269.

Alexander

(2014) Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Science and Engineering Ethics 20(3): 717–733.

Alfirdaus

Eric

Farsijana

(2015) Theories of social solidarity in the situations of (natural) disasters. Politika 6(1): 44–70.

Alkın

(2021) Afet yönetiminde sivil toplum: İzmir depremi sonrası müdahale ve iyileştirme aşamaları üzerine bir inceleme. Karadeniz Araştırmaları XVIII(70): 313–334.

Aydın

(2024) 6 Şubat 2023 depremlerinde sosyal yardımlar: Sosyal yardımlaşma ve dayanışma vakıflarının rolü. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi 15(1): 235–260.

10.

Barton

(1969) Communities in Disaster: A Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations. New York: Doubleday.

11.

Boulianne

Minaker

Haney

(2018) Does compassion go viral? Social media, caring, and the Fort McMurray wildfire. Information, Communication & Society 21(5): 697–711.

12.

Çalışkan

Kaya

(2021) Deprem sonrasındaki toplumsal dayanışma pratiklerinin sosyolojik görünümü: İzmir depremi örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi 12(32): 1052–1077.

13.

Chan

(2014) Social identity gratifications of social network sites and their impact on collective action participation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 17(3): 229–235.

14.

Cheng

Mitomo

(2018) Effects of media information on collective resilience in a disaster—a case study of the crisis of stranded commuters in Tokyo during the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 21(1–2): 83–96.

15.

Cheng

Mitomo

Otsuka

, et al (2016) Cultivation effects of mass and social media on perceptions and behavioural intentions in post-disaster recovery—the case of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Telematics and Informatics 33(3): 753–772.

16.

Clarke

(2002) Panic: myth or reality? Contexts 1(3): 21–26.

17.

Collins

(2004) Rituals of solidarity and security in the wake of terrorist attack. Sociological Theory 22(1): 53–87.

18.

Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı (SBB) (2023) Kahramanmaraş ve Hatay depremleri raporu. Available at: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/2023-kahramanmaras-ve-hatay-depremleri-raporu/ (accessed 18 June 2024).

19.

Drabek

(1986) Human System Responses to Disaster. New York: Springer-Verlag.

20.

Drabek

(2017) Sociology of disaster. In: Korgen

(ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology: Specialty and Interdisciplinary Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.139–147.

21.

Drury

Brown

González

, et al (2016) Emergent social identity and observing social support predict social support provided by survivors in a disaster: solidarity in the 2010 Chile earthquake. European Journal of Social Psychology 46(2): 209–223.

22.

Drury

Cocking

Reicher

(2009) Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. British Journal of Social Psychology 48(3): 487–506.

23.

Durkheim

(1984) The Division of Labour in Society. Hampshire: Macmillan Publishers.

24.

Durkheim

(1995) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.

25.

Durmaz Yurt

Yeniçırak

(2024) How social capital operated in Turkey following the earthquakes of February 6, 2023. Turkish Studies 25(4): 742–773.

26.

Dynes

(1970) Organized Behavior in Disaster. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.

27.

Erdem

(2023) Şubat 2023 Depremini sosyolojik açıdan okumak. Available at: https://www.sde.org.tr/tevfik-erdem/genel/6-subat-2023-depremini-sosyolojik-acidan-okumak-kose-yazisi-29631 (accessed 28 August 2024).

28.

Erdoğan

(2023) Depremin sosyolojisi: 6 Şubat felaketinin toplumsal ve kültürel boyutları. TRT Akademi 8(18): 718–725.

29.

Erikson

(2010) A new species of trouble: explorations in disaster, trauma and community. Europe’s Journal of Psychology 2: 175–179.

30.

Fritz

(1961) Disaster. In: Merton

Nisbet

(eds) Contemporary Social Problems. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, pp.651–694.

31.

Fritz

Williams

(1957) The human being in disasters: a research perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 309(1): 42–51.

32.

Hawdon

Ryan

(2011) Social relations that generate and sustain solidarity after a mass tragedy. Social Forces 89(4): 1363–1384.

33.

Hawdon

Ryan

Agnich

(2010) Crime as a source of solidarity: a research note testing Durkheim’s assertion. Deviant Behavior 31(8): 679–703.

34.

Hong

JYJ

Kim

Lee

, et al (2018) Community disaster resilience and social solidarity on social media: a semantic network analysis of the Sewol ferry disaster. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal 23(3): n3.

35.

Houston

Hawthorne

Perreault

, et al (2015) Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters 39(1): 1–22.

36.

Jamali

Nejat

Ghosh

, et al (2019) Social media data and post-disaster recovery. International Journal Information Management 44: 25–37.

37.

Kaniasty

(2020) Social support, interpersonal, and community dynamics following disasters caused by natural hazards. Current Opinion in Psychology 32: 105–109.

38.

Kolukırık

Tuna

(2009) Türk medyasında deprem algısı: Marmara depremi örneği. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences 8(8): 286–298.

39.

Letukas

Olofsson

Barnshaw

(2009) Solidarity trumps catastrophe? An empirical and analytical analysis of post-Tsunami media in two western nations. Preliminary Paper. Available at: https://udspace.udel.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/b8666a14-66f0-4b5c-a128-fbf3d7a6c891/content (accessed 29 June 2024).

40.

Masud-All-Kamal

Monirul Hassan

(2018) The link between social capital and disaster recovery: evidence from coastal communities in Bangladesh. Natural Hazards 93: 1547–1564.

41.

Mawson

(2005) Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes 68(2): 95–113.

42.

Mitomo

Otsuku

Kimura

(2015) The role of media and ICT to motivate people to take post-quake recovery action: an evidence of the “Pythagorean effect.” In: Mitomo

Fuke

Bohlin

(eds) The Smart Revolution Towards the Sustainable Digital Society—Beyond the Era of Convergence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.140–158.

43.

Ogie

Clarke

Forehead

, et al (2019) Crowdsourced social media data for disaster management: lessons from the PetaJakarta.org project. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 73: 108–117.

44.

Ogie

James

Moore

, et al (2022) Social media use in disaster recovery: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 70: 102783.

45.

Panday

Rushton

Karki

, et al (2021) The role of social capital in disaster resilience in remote communities after the 2015 Nepal Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 55: 102–112.

46.

Putnam

(1993) The prosperous community. The American Prospect 4(13): 35–42.

47.

Quarantelli

(1954) The nature and conditions of panic. American Journal of Sociology 60(3): 267–275.

48.

Quarantelli

Dynes

(1976) Community conflict: its absence and its presence in natural disasters. Mass Emergencies 1(2): 139–152.

49.

Quarantelli

Dynes

(1977) Response to social crisis and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology 3(1): 23–49.

50.

Rahayu

Irwan

Putra

(2022) Supporting factors for the development of community social solidarity in the face of the flood disaster in Sungai Limau district, Padang Parıaman regency, West Sumatera. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi 11(4): 713–722.

51.

Sezici

NÖ

(2023) Dayanışma ve yardımlaşma kavramları üzerinden deprem seferberliği. Ankara Barosu Dergisi 81: 171–195.

52.

Strauss

(1944) The literature on panic. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 39(3): 317–328.

53.

Sweet

(1998) The effect of a natural disaster on social cohesion: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 16: 321–331.

54.

Taylor

Wells

Howell

, et al (2012) The role of social media as psychological first aid as a support to community resilience building. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 27(1): 20–26.

55.

Tierney

Bevc

Kuligowski

(2006) Metaphors matter: disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in Hurricane Katrina. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604: 57–81.

56.

Turner

(1967) Types of solidarity in the reconstituting of groups. Pacific Sociological Review 10(2): 60–68.

57.

Uekusa

(2018) Rethinking resilience: Bourdieu’s contribution to disaster research. Resilience 6(3): 181–195.

58.

(2009) Durkheim in Sichuan: the earthquake, national solidarity, and the politics of small things. Social Psychology Quarterly 72(1): 5–8.

59.

Yıldırım

(2023) 6 Şubat Kahramanmaraş depreminin psikososyal etkisi ve depremzedelere yönelik sürdürülebilir müdahalenin önemi üzerine bir gözlem araştırması. Anasay 6(24): 133–153.