This study explores changes in social solidarity after the 6 February 2023, earthquakes in Turkey, focusing on the most affected Turkish province, Hatay. Through semi-structured interviews with 30 earthquake survivors (19 women, 11 men) residing in a temporary container city, the research found that strong social solidarity networks initially accelerated victims’ psychosocial and economic recovery. However, over time, these networks weakened, and individual efforts replaced collective action, slowing the recovery process. Contributing factors included reduced media coverage, growing public insensitivity, and systemic issues like aid distribution and reserve area policies, all of which hindered long-term solidarity.
AçıkalınO (2018) Türkiye’ye ilişkin sosyal boyutlu deprem yazınına eleştirel bir bakış. Resilience2(2): 85–104.
2.
AlbrisK (2023) ‘Our society works’: disaster solidarity and models of social life in the Elbe River Valley. Ethnos. Epub ahead of print25October. DOI: 10.1080/00141844.2023.2274294.
3.
AldrichDP (2012) Social capital: its role in post-disaster recovery. In: AldrichDP (ed.) Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press, pp.1–23.
4.
AldrichDPCrookK (2008) Strong civil society as a double-edged sword: siting trailers in post-Katrina New Orleans. Political Research Quarterly61(3): 379–389.
5.
AldrichDPMeyerMA (2015) Social capital and community resilience. American Behavioral Scientist59(2): 254–269.
6.
AlexanderDE (2014) Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Science and Engineering Ethics20(3): 717–733.
7.
AlfirdausLKEricHFarsijanaAR (2015) Theories of social solidarity in the situations of (natural) disasters. Politika6(1): 44–70.
8.
AlkınR (2021) Afet yönetiminde sivil toplum: İzmir depremi sonrası müdahale ve iyileştirme aşamaları üzerine bir inceleme. Karadeniz AraştırmalarıXVIII(70): 313–334.
9.
AydınA (2024) 6 Şubat 2023 depremlerinde sosyal yardımlar: Sosyal yardımlaşma ve dayanışma vakıflarının rolü. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi15(1): 235–260.
10.
BartonAH (1969) Communities in Disaster: A Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations. New York: Doubleday.
11.
BoulianneSMinakerJHaneyTJ (2018) Does compassion go viral? Social media, caring, and the Fort McMurray wildfire. Information, Communication & Society21(5): 697–711.
12.
ÇalışkanAKayaG (2021) Deprem sonrasındaki toplumsal dayanışma pratiklerinin sosyolojik görünümü: İzmir depremi örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi12(32): 1052–1077.
13.
ChanM (2014) Social identity gratifications of social network sites and their impact on collective action participation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology17(3): 229–235.
14.
ChengJWMitomoH (2018) Effects of media information on collective resilience in a disaster—a case study of the crisis of stranded commuters in Tokyo during the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. Asian Journal of Social Psychology21(1–2): 83–96.
15.
ChengJWMitomoHOtsukaT, et al (2016) Cultivation effects of mass and social media on perceptions and behavioural intentions in post-disaster recovery—the case of the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Telematics and Informatics33(3): 753–772.
16.
ClarkeL (2002) Panic: myth or reality?Contexts1(3): 21–26.
17.
CollinsR (2004) Rituals of solidarity and security in the wake of terrorist attack. Sociological Theory22(1): 53–87.
DrabekTE (1986) Human System Responses to Disaster. New York: Springer-Verlag.
20.
DrabekTE (2017) Sociology of disaster. In: KorgenK (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Sociology: Specialty and Interdisciplinary Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.139–147.
21.
DruryJBrownRGonzálezR, et al (2016) Emergent social identity and observing social support predict social support provided by survivors in a disaster: solidarity in the 2010 Chile earthquake. European Journal of Social Psychology46(2): 209–223.
22.
DruryJCockingCReicherS (2009) Everyone for themselves? A comparative study of crowd solidarity among emergency survivors. British Journal of Social Psychology48(3): 487–506.
23.
DurkheimE (1984) The Division of Labour in Society. Hampshire: Macmillan Publishers.
24.
DurkheimE (1995) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.
25.
Durmaz YurtBYeniçırakH (2024) How social capital operated in Turkey following the earthquakes of February 6, 2023. Turkish Studies25(4): 742–773.
26.
DynesRR (1970) Organized Behavior in Disaster. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
ErdoğanB (2023) Depremin sosyolojisi: 6 Şubat felaketinin toplumsal ve kültürel boyutları. TRT Akademi8(18): 718–725.
29.
EriksonK (2010) A new species of trouble: explorations in disaster, trauma and community. Europe’s Journal of Psychology2: 175–179.
30.
FritzCE (1961) Disaster. In: MertonRKNisbetRA (eds) Contemporary Social Problems. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, pp.651–694.
31.
FritzCEWilliamsHB (1957) The human being in disasters: a research perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science309(1): 42–51.
32.
HawdonJRyanJ (2011) Social relations that generate and sustain solidarity after a mass tragedy. Social Forces89(4): 1363–1384.
33.
HawdonJRyanJAgnichL (2010) Crime as a source of solidarity: a research note testing Durkheim’s assertion. Deviant Behavior31(8): 679–703.
34.
HongJYJKimNLeeS, et al (2018) Community disaster resilience and social solidarity on social media: a semantic network analysis of the Sewol ferry disaster. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal23(3): n3.
35.
HoustonJBHawthorneJPerreaultMF, et al (2015) Social media and disasters: a functional framework for social media use in disaster planning, response, and research. Disasters39(1): 1–22.
36.
JamaliMNejatAGhoshS, et al (2019) Social media data and post-disaster recovery. International Journal Information Management44: 25–37.
37.
KaniastyK (2020) Social support, interpersonal, and community dynamics following disasters caused by natural hazards. Current Opinion in Psychology32: 105–109.
38.
KolukırıkSTunaM (2009) Türk medyasında deprem algısı: Marmara depremi örneği. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences8(8): 286–298.
Masud-All-KamalMDMonirul HassanSM (2018) The link between social capital and disaster recovery: evidence from coastal communities in Bangladesh. Natural Hazards93: 1547–1564.
41.
MawsonAR (2005) Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes68(2): 95–113.
42.
MitomoHOtsukuTKimuraM (2015) The role of media and ICT to motivate people to take post-quake recovery action: an evidence of the “Pythagorean effect.” In: MitomoHFukeHBohlinE (eds) The Smart Revolution Towards the Sustainable Digital Society—Beyond the Era of Convergence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.140–158.
43.
OgieRIClarkeRJForeheadH, et al (2019) Crowdsourced social media data for disaster management: lessons from the PetaJakarta.org project. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems73: 108–117.
44.
OgieRIJamesSMooreA, et al (2022) Social media use in disaster recovery: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction70: 102783.
45.
PandaySRushtonSKarkiJ, et al (2021) The role of social capital in disaster resilience in remote communities after the 2015 Nepal Earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction55: 102–112.
46.
PutnamR (1993) The prosperous community. The American Prospect4(13): 35–42.
47.
QuarantelliEL (1954) The nature and conditions of panic. American Journal of Sociology60(3): 267–275.
48.
QuarantelliELDynesRR (1976) Community conflict: its absence and its presence in natural disasters. Mass Emergencies1(2): 139–152.
49.
QuarantelliELDynesRR (1977) Response to social crisis and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology3(1): 23–49.
50.
RahayuIIrwanIPutraIM (2022) Supporting factors for the development of community social solidarity in the face of the flood disaster in Sungai Limau district, Padang Parıaman regency, West Sumatera. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi11(4): 713–722.
51.
SeziciNÖ (2023) Dayanışma ve yardımlaşma kavramları üzerinden deprem seferberliği. Ankara Barosu Dergisi81: 171–195.
52.
StraussAL (1944) The literature on panic. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology39(3): 317–328.
53.
SweetS (1998) The effect of a natural disaster on social cohesion: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters16: 321–331.
54.
TaylorMWellsGHowellG, et al (2012) The role of social media as psychological first aid as a support to community resilience building. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management27(1): 20–26.
55.
TierneyKJBevcCKuligowskiE (2006) Metaphors matter: disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in Hurricane Katrina. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science604: 57–81.
56.
TurnerRH (1967) Types of solidarity in the reconstituting of groups. Pacific Sociological Review10(2): 60–68.
XuB (2009) Durkheim in Sichuan: the earthquake, national solidarity, and the politics of small things. Social Psychology Quarterly72(1): 5–8.
59.
YıldırımS (2023) 6 Şubat Kahramanmaraş depreminin psikososyal etkisi ve depremzedelere yönelik sürdürülebilir müdahalenin önemi üzerine bir gözlem araştırması. Anasay6(24): 133–153.
