The functionality of social infrastructure in the global South is hampered by incapacitated governments, which affect people’s sense of place. This study explored co-management of social infrastructure towards creating a sense of place. This qualitative study collected data from purposively selected households and key informants using semi-structured interviews. Findings show that the co-management of social infrastructure by the Chitungwiza Municipality is top-down and crowds out residents’ participation. Most social infrastructure is none functional and unattractive to communities. Residents lacked user groups to demand improved social infrastructure. The study recommends role clarity and community empowerment to promote improved co-management of social infrastructure.
AlexanderER (2005) Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Planning Theory4(3): 209–223.
2.
Benit-GbaffouC (2015) The management of parks and nature reserves in Johannesburg – exploring partnerships between communities and City Parks. The case of Golden Harvest, James and Ethel Gray, Mshenguville Parks and Melville Koppies, Klipriviersberg Natural Reserves. School of Architecture and Planning, Centre for Urbanism and Built Environment Studies, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
3.
BerkesFGeorgesPPrestonRJ (1991) Co-management: The evolution in theory and practice of the joint administration of living resources. Alternative Perspective on Society, Technology and Environment18(2): 12–18.
4.
BoamahEF (2023) Planning as polycentric: Institutionalist lessons for communicative and collaborative planning in global south contexts. Planning Theory22(2): 131–153.
5.
CalderonCWestinM (2021) Understanding context and its influence on collaborative planning processes: A contribution to communicative planning theory. International Planning Studies26(1): 14–27.
6.
CanterD (1977) The Psychology of Place. London.: Architectural Press.
7.
CarlssonLBerkesF (2005) Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management75: 65–76.
8.
CiroliaLRVan GeesbergenJCroeseS (2022) Fiscal decentralization, comparative data, and sustainable development: What do we (need to) know about financing subnational governments in Africa? In: CroeseSParnellS (eds) Localizing the SDGs in African Cities. Cham, Switzerland: Sustainable Development Goals Series, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95979-1_9.
9.
CleaverF (1991) Maintenance of rural water supplies in Zimbabwe. Waterlines9(4): 23–26.
10.
CloeteMYusufS (2018) Conceptual commentary of public spaces in Durban, South Africa. Town and Regional Planning37: 35–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.18820/2415-0495/trp73.3
11.
ConnellyS (2010) Participation in a Hostile state: How do planners act to shape public engagement in politically difficult environments?Planning Practice and Research25(3): 333–351.
12.
CreswellJWCreswellJD (2023) Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 6th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
13.
DavernMGunnLWhitzmanC, et al (2017) Using spatial measures to test a conceptual model of social infrastructure that supports health and wellbeing. Cities and Health1(2): 194–209.
14.
Devine-WrightPClaytonS (2010) Introduction to the special issue: Place, identify and environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology30(3): 267–270.
15.
ErfaniG (2022) Reconceptualising sense of place: Towards a conceptual framework for investigating individual-community-place relationships. Journal of Planning Literature37(3): 452–466.
16.
FinnBMBandaukoE (2024) Dwindling funds and increased responsibilities: Decentralization, unfunded mandates, and Harare’s infrastructure crisis. Habitat International148: 103087.
17.
FrancisJGiles-CortiBWoodL, et al (2012) Creating a sense of community: The roles of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology32: 401–409.
18.
FraserTFeeleyQRidgeA, et al (2024) How far I’ll go: Social infrastructure accessibility and proximity in urban neighbourhoods. Landscape and Urban Planning: 241: 104922. DOI:10.1016/.2023.104922.
19.
GandiwaEMashapaCChibememeG, et al (2021) Wildlife ownership, access and conservation: A reflection from pre-colonial to post-colonial period in Zimbabwe. In: GandiwaEMashapaCMubokoN (eds) Wildlife and Fisheries Management in Zimbabwe: A critical reflection. School of Wildlife, Ecology and Conservation. Chinhoyi: Chinhoyi University of Technology Publications, 1–15.
20.
GhoomiHAYazdanfarSAHosseiniS-B, et al (2015) Comparing the components of sense of place in the traditional and modern residential neighbourhoods. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences201: 275–285.
21.
GottwaldSAlbertCFagerholmN (2022) Combining sense of place theory with the ecosystem services concept: Empirical insights and reflections from a participatory mapping study. Landscape Ecology37: 633–655.
22.
Government of Zimbabwe (1996a) Regional Town and Country Planning Act (Chapter 29:12). Harare: Government Printers.
23.
Government of Zimbabwe (1996b) The Urban Councils Act [Chapter 29:15]. Harare: Government Printers.
24.
GrayB (1989) Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
25.
HabermasJ (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26.
HarrisonP (2006) On the edge of reason: Planning and urban futures in Africa. Urban Studies43(2): 319–335.
HealeyP (2003) Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory2(2): 101–123.
29.
HibbardMLurieS (2000) Saving land but losing ground: Challenges to community planning in the era of participation. Journal of Planning Education and Research20(2): 187–195.
30.
HidalgoMCHernándezB (2001) Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology21(3): 273–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221.
31.
HowiePMurphySWicksJ (2010) An application of a stated preference method to value urban amenities. Urban Studies47: 235–256.
32.
HuMChenR (2018) A framework for understanding a sense of place in an urban design context. Urban Science2(34): 1–19.
33.
InalhanGFinchE (2004) Place attachment and sense of belonging. Facilities22(5/6): 120–128.
34.
InnesJ (1995) Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research14(4): 183–189.
35.
JacobsJ (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.
36.
JorgensenBSStedmanRC (2001) Sense of place as an attitude. Lakeshore owners’ attitude towards their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology21: 33–48.
37.
KativhuTMadzivanyikaTTNunuWN, et al (2022) Sustainability of water facilities under community-based management in Zimbabwe. AQUA – Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society7(1): 19–30.
38.
LathamALaytonJ (2022) Social infrastructure: Why it matters and how urban geographers might study it. Urban Geography43(5): 659–668.
39.
LynchK (1960) The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
MastersonVAStedmanRCEnqvistJ, et al. (2017) The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research: A review and research agenda. Ecology and Society22(1): 49. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08872-220149.
41.
MastersonVAEnqvistJPStedmanRC, et al (2019) Sense of place in social-ecological systems: From theory to empirics. Sustainability Science14: 555–564.
42.
MatamandaARChirisaIMazanhiP, et al. (2024) The interface between politics, ethics and urban planning: The case of land and space barons in Harare, Zimbabwe. EPC: Politics and Space0(0): 1–18.
43.
MathurVKSteinSH (1993) The role of amenities in a general equilibrium model of regional migration and growth. Southern Economic Journal59(3): 394.
44.
MeetiyagodaLMahanamaPKSLeyA, et al (2023) Sense of place dynamics in public places. Telematique22(1): 1372–1389.
45.
MuchadenyikaDWilliamsJJ (2016) Social change: Urban governance and urbanization in Zimbabwe. Urban Forum27(3): 253–274.
46.
MulliganGCarruthersJ (2011) Amenities, Quality of Life, and Regional Development. In: MaransRStimsonR (eds) Investigating Quality Urban Life, Theory Methods, and Empirical Research. Dordrecht: Springer, 107–134.
47.
PanterJV (1991) Participation in the design of urban space. Landscape Design200: 24–27.
48.
RaitioK (2012) New institutional approach to collaborative forest planning on public land: Methods for analysis and lessons for policy. Land Use Policy29(2): 309–316.
49.
RamkissoonHSmithLDGWeilerB (2013) Relationships between place attachment, place satisfaction, and pro-environmental behaviour in an Australian national park. Journal of Sustainable Tourism21(3): 434–457.
50.
RatauFPhakatiLMasiloO, et al (2015) Joint management of Parks in Johannesburg. The case of James and Ethel Gray Park. Research Report. School of Architecture and Planning, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
51.
RelphE (1976) Place and Placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
52.
RitchieJLewisJ (eds) (2003) Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London/Delhi: Sage Publications.
53.
ServilloLAVan Den BroeckP (2012) The social construction of planning systems: A strategic relational institutionalist approach. Planning Practice and Research27(1): 41–61.
54.
ShamaiSIlatovZ (2004) Measuring sense of place: Methodological aspects. Journal of Economic and Social Geography96(5): 467–476.
55.
ShamaiSKellermanA (1985) Conceptual and experimental aspects of regional awareness. An Israeli case study. Journal of Economic and Social Geography76: 88–89.
56.
SilverJ (2015) Disrupted infrastructure: An urban political ecology of interrupted electricity in Accra. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39: 984–1003.
57.
SinghJ (2022) The impact of social infrastructure and physical infrastructure on economic growth in Punjab, India. Journal of Asia and African Studies57(5): 997–1012.
58.
SingletonS (1998) Constructing: The Evolution of Institutions of Co-management. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
59.
SproullN (1995) Handbook of Research Methods. A Guide for Practitioners and Students in the Social Sciences, 2nd ed.Metuchen/London: The Scarecrow Press.
60.
ThompsonAWProkopyLS (2016) The role of sense of place in collaborative planning. Journal of Sustainability Education11: 2151–7452.
61.
TuanY-F (1977) Space and Place. The Perspective of Experience. London: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.
62.
WatsonV (2002) The usefulness of normative planning theories in the context of Sub-Saharan Africa. Planning Theory1: 27–52.
63.
WatsonV (2009) The planned city sweeps the poor away. . .! Urban planning and the 21st century urbanisation. Progress in Planning72: 151–193.
64.
WhittingtonDDavisJProkopyL, et al (2008) BWPI Working paper 22: How well is the demand-driven, community management model for rural water supply systems doing?Evidence from Bolivia, Peru, and Ghana. Brooks World Poverty Institute22: 1–26.
65.
World Bank (1999) Report from the International Workshop on Community-Based Natural Resources Management. Washington, DC, 10–14May1998.
66.
YescombeER (2007) Public-Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance. Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier.
67.
Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency (2022) 2022 Population and Housing Census. Preliminary Report on Population Figures. Harare: Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency.
