This paper analyses the construction of Muslim masculinities and their positioning towards women’s economic empowerment through a life history method applied to examine the lives of 12 purposely selected Bangladeshi Muslim men. The analysis of the men’s accounts positioned the narrators on a masculinity continuum, which incorporates three fluid masculinity markers – Antagonists, Allies and Advocates. The paper challenges the notion of one specific hegemonic masculinity, although some common features were identified, such as dominance of the male breadwinner and situatedness within heteronormativity. The narrators demonstrated a strong inter-generational shift towards rejection of violence and preference for peaceful intrahousehold relationships, even among Antagonists. The proximity of Ally masculinities to Advocates and their relational interests create strong potential for strategic engagement and guiding Ally men to adopt more progressive masculinities.
AgarwalB (1994) Gender and command over property: a critical gap in economic analysis and policy in South Asia. World Development22(10): 1455–1478.
2.
AhmedDS (2006) Gender and Islamic spirituality: a psychological view of ‘low’ fundamentalism. In: OuzganeL (ed.) Islamic Masculinities. London: Zen Books, pp.11–34.
3.
AhmedFE (2008) Microcredit, men, and masculinity. The National Women’s Studies Association Journal20(2): 122–155.
4.
AhmedFE (2014) Peace in the household: gender, agency, and villagers’ measures of marital quality in Bangladesh. Feminist Economics20(4): 187–211.
5.
AnwaryA (2015) Construction of hegemonic masculinity: violence against wives in Bangladesh. Women’s Studies International Forum50: 37–46.
6.
AsadullahNMWahhajZ (2016) Missing from the Market: Purdah Norm and Women’s Paid Work Participation in Bangladesh. Bonn: IZA Institute of Labour Economics.
7.
BadranM (2009) Feminism in Islam: Secular and Religious Convergences. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
8.
BarkerGPawlakP (2011) Men, Families, Gender Equality and Care Work. New York: United Nations.
9.
BartkySL (1988) Foucault, femininity and the modernization of patriarchal power. In: DiamondIQuinbyI (eds) Feminism & Foucault: Reflections on Resistance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press, pp. 25–45.
10.
BrickellKChantS (2010) The unbearable heaviness of being: reflections on female altruism in Cambodia, Philippines, The Gambia and Costa Rica. Progress in Development Studies10(2): 145–159.
11.
ButlerJ (2007) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
12.
ChambersR (2017) Can We Know Better? Reflections for Development. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.
CornwallA (2016) Women’s empowerment: what works?Journal of International Development28(3): 342–359.
15.
FloodM (2015) Men and gender equality. In: FloodMHowsonR (eds) Engaging Men in Building Gender Equality. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 1–31.
16.
HanlonN (2012) Masculinities, Care and Equality: Identity and Nurture in Men’s Lives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
HasanKAggletonPPerssonA (2018) The makings of a man: social generational masculinities in Bangladesh. Journal of Gender Studies27(3): 347–361.
18.
HolterØG (2003) Can Men Do It? Men and Gender Equality – The Nordic Experience. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
19.
hooksb (1984) Men as comrades in struggle. In hooksb (ed.) Feminist Theory From Margin to Center. Boston, MA: South End Press, pp. 67–82.
20.
hooksb (1998) The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. New York: Atria.
21.
HopkinsPGorman-MurrayA (2019) Masculinities and geography, moving forward: men’s bodies, emotions and spiritualities. Gender, Place & Culture26(3): 301–314.
22.
HossainA (2017) The paradox of recognition: hijra, third gender and sexual rights in Bangladesh. Culture, Health & Sexuality19(12): 1418–1431.
23.
HosseinN (2021) The SDGs and the empowerment of Bangladeshi women. In: ChaturvediSJanusHKlingebielS, et al. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Development Cooperation for Achieving the 2030 Agenda. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 453–474.
24.
HughesGF (2017) The chastity society: disciplining Muslim men. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute23(2): 267–284.
25.
HulmeD (2007) Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research for Country Case Studies of Development. Manchester: Global Poverty Research Group.
IrigarayL (1985) Speculum of the Other Woman. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
JacksonCM (2015) Antagonist, Advocates and Allies: The Wake Up Call Guide for White Women Who Want to Become Allies With Black Women. Omaha, NE: Catriceology Enterprises.
29.
JewkesRMorrellRHearnJ, et al. (2015) Hegemonic masculinity: combining theory and practice in gender interventions. Culture, Health & Sexuality17(2): 112–127.
30.
JohanssonT (2011) The construction of the new father. how middle class men become present fathers. International Review of Modern Sociology37: 111–126.
31.
Kabasakal AratZFHasanA (2017) Muslim masculinities: what is the prescription of the Qur’an?Journal of Gender Studies27(7): 788–801.
32.
KabeerNMahmudSTasneemS (2017) The contested relationship between paid work and women’s empowerment: empirical analysis from Bangladesh. European Journal of Development Research30(2): 235–251.
33.
KamruzzamanM (2015) Dowry related violence against rural women in Bangladesh. American Journal of Psychology and Cognitive Science1(4): 112–116.
34.
KandiyotiD (1988) Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society2(3): 274–290.
35.
KimmelM (1996) Manhood in America. New York: The Free Press.
36.
KouritzinSG (2000) Bringing life to research: life history research and ESL. TESL Canada Journal17(2): 1–35.
37.
LewisD (2008) Using life histories in social policy research: the case of third sector/public sector boundary crossing. Journal of Social Policy37(4): 559–578.
38.
MacCormackCStrathernM (eds) (1980) Nature, Culture and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
MolyneuxM (1985) Mobilization without emancipation? Women’s interest, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua. Feminist Studies11(2): 227–254.
40.
MolyneuxM (2007) Change and Continuity in Social Protection in Latin America Mothers at the Service of the State?Geneva: UNRISD.
41.
MoserC (1989) Gender planning in the third world: meeting practical and strategic gender needs. World Development17(11): 1799–1825.
42.
Musawah (2018) Who Provides? Who Cares? Changing Dynamics in Muslim Families.Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Musawah.
PeaseB (2002) (Re)constructing men’s interests. Men and Masculinities5(2): 123–143.
45.
PeaseB (2006) Encouraging critical reflections on privilege in social work and the human services. Practice Reflexions1(1): 15–26.
46.
PeaseB (2014) Reconstructing masculinity or ending manhood? The potential and limitations of transforming masculine subjectivities for gender equality. In: CarabíÀ (ed.) Alternative Masculinities for a Changing World (Global Masculinities). New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–34.
47.
PhillipsA (2004) Defending equality of outcome. The Journal of Political Philosophy12(1): 1–19.
48.
PoudyalR (2000) Alternative masculinities in South Asia. An exploration through films for schools. IDS Bulletin31(2): 75–78.
49.
RateleK (2015) Working through resistance in engaging boys and men towards gender equality and progressive masculinities. Culture, Health & Sexuality17(2): 144–158.
50.
RowlandsJ (1995) Empowerment examined. Development in Practice5(2): 101–107.
51.
SenA (1999) Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
52.
WhatlingC (1997) Utopian conceptions: rethinking the straight mind. Paragraph20(2): 174–189.
