Despite concerns about the stability of the early days of the Kim Jong Un regime, he has firmly established his control over the existing system. How was he able to achieve this? Important insights are provided by Kim Jong Un’s patter of official appointments, particularly involving the members of the Central Committee of the Workers Party of Korea (WPK). This study scrutinizes the pattern of elite appointments under Kim Jong Un from 2012 to 2019, examining the personal data of 296 members of the WPK Central Committee. The results reveal that under Kim Jong Un’s leadership, party and military elites enjoyed the privilege of being appointed to key posts compared with cabinet elites. However, as his power consolidation advanced, this preferential treatment for party and military elites began to diminish starting in 2016. These findings suggest that certain tensions and conflicts may exist within North Korea under Kim’s rule.
ArriolaLR (2009) Patronage and political stability in Africa. Comparative Political Studies42(10): 1339–1362.
2.
BaekHS (2010) History of North Korean Power. Paju, South Korea: Hanoul. [In Korean]
3.
BellinE (2004) The robustness of authoritarianism in the middle east: exceptionalism in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics36(2): 139–157.
4.
BrownleeJ (2007) Hereditary succession in modern autocracies. World Politics59(4): 595–628.
5.
Bueno de MesquitaBSmithA (2011) The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior Is Almost Always Good Politics. London: Hachette UK.
6.
CheibubJAGandhiJVreelandJR (2010) Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice143(1–2): 67–101.
7.
ChoCR (2011) The process of establishing the Kim Jong Un succession system and perspectives on its possible forms of change. Journal of Northeast Asian Studies61(1): 129–148. [In Korean]
8.
EgorovGSoninK (2014) Incumbency Advantage in Non-Democracies. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
9.
EllisCMHorowitzMCStamAC (2015) Introducing the LEAD data set. International Interactions41(4): 718–741.
10.
FitzpatrickS (2015) On Stalin’s Team: The Years of Living Dangerously in Soviet Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
FrantzESteinEA (2017) Countering coups: leadership succession rules in dictatorships. Comparative Political Studies50(7): 935–962.
12.
GandhiJ (2008) Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GandhiJPrzeworskiA (2007) Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies40(11): 1279–1301.
14.
GeddesB (1999) What do we know about democratization after twenty years?Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 115–144.
15.
GeddesB (2003) Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
16.
GeddesBWrightJFrantzE (2014) Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: a new data set. Perspectives on Politics12(2): 313–331.
17.
GeddesBWrightJFrantzE (2018) How Dictatorships Work: Power, Personalization, and Collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
GoemansHEGleditschKSChiozzaG (2009) Introducing Archigos: a dataset of political leaders. Journal of Peace Research46(2): 269–283.
19.
HaggardSHermanLRyuJ (2014) Political change in North Korea: mapping the succession. Asian Survey54(4): 773–800.
20.
HerzJH (1952) The problem of successorship in dictatorial regimes: a study in comparative law and institutions. The Journal of Politics14(1): 19–40.
21.
IshiyamaJ (2014) Assessing the leadership transition in North Korea: using network analysis of field inspections, 1997–2012. Communist and Post-Communist Studies47(2): 137–146.
22.
Kendall-TaylorAFrantzE (2016) When dictators die. Journal of Democracy27(4): 159–171.
23.
KimJH (2012a) Diagnosis of the durability of the Kim Jong-un regime: focusing on the comparison with the Kim Jong-il regime. Analysis of Issues—Online Series12(23): 10–40. [In Korean]
24.
KimKS (2012b) The Kim Jong-un regime’s succession and political imperatives. Unification Policy Studies21(1): 1–24. [In Korean]
25.
KohYH (2011) North Korea’s leadership succession to Kim Jong-un: transfer of power from the military to the party. Korean Political Science Review45(5): 175–192. [In Korean]
26.
LeeGMKimIK (2012) A study on the power structure and internal policy of Kim Jong Un regime. The Journal of Peace Studies13(4): 73–88. [In Korean]
27.
LeeMC (2016) Kim Jong-un’s “Reign of Terror” and His Governance Leadership. Seoul, South Korea: National Institute for Unification Education. [In Korean]
28.
LimJC (2012) North Korea’s hereditary succession: comparing two key transitions in the DPRK. Asian Survey52(3): 550–570.
29.
MagaloniBMinEChuJ (2013) Autocracies of the World, 1950-2012 (Version 1.0). Stanford, CA: Dataset, Stanford University.
30.
MahdaviPIshiyamaJ (2020) Dynamics of the inner elite in dictatorships: evidence from North Korea. Comparative Politics52(2): 221–249.
31.
MengA (2019) Accessing the state: executive constraints and credible commitment in dictatorship. Journal of Theoretical Politics31(4): 568–599.
32.
OhKSParkHJKimJH, et al. (2019) Kim Jong-un Regime’s Core Group Formation and Power Dynamics. Seoul, South Korea: Korea Institute for National Unification. [In Korean]
33.
PakJH (2020) Becoming Kim Jong Un: A Former CIA Officer’s Insight into North Korea’s Enigmatic Young Director. New York: Ballantine Books.
34.
PerlmutterALeoGrandeWM (1982) The Party in uniform: toward a theory of civil-military relations in communist political systems. American Political Science Review76(4): 778–789.
35.
SlaterD (2003) Iron cage in an iron fist: authoritarian institutions and the personalization of power in Malaysia. Comparative Politics36(1): 81–101.
36.
SnyderR (1992) Explaining transitions from neopatrimonial dictatorships. Comparative Politics24(4): 379–399.
37.
SudduthJK (2017) Strategic logic of elite purges in dictatorships. Comparative Political Studies50(13): 1768–1801.
38.
SvolikMW (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
TorigianJ (2022) Prestige, Manipulation, and Coercion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
WadaH (2012) Contemporary History of North Korea. Paju, South Korea: Changbi.
41.
WayCWeeksJ (2014) Making it personal: regime type and nuclear proliferation. American Journal of Political Science58(3): 705–719.
42.
YoonDM (2012) Where will the three-generations succession of North Korea go? From Kim Jong-il to Kim Jong-un. IFANS Focus2012(4): 1–3. [In Korean]
